Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCounty Board of Supervisors - Minutes - 5/27/1980May 27, 1980
MEETING OF THE BAYFIELD COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Mav 27. 1980
The meeting was called to order at 9:37 a.m. by County Board Chairman Walter Barningham
The following members answered roll call: No. 1
Present - Erickson, Barningham, Bromberg, Maki, McGillivray, Seidel, Strom, Rave, Soderstrom,
Johnson, Carter,Diamon, Anderson, Wickman, Ludzack, Renoos
Absent - Meierotto, Sechen
Present - 16
Absent - 2
TOTAL 18
No. 2
A prayer and pledge of allegiance were led by Larry Seidel, board member.
No. 3
Moved by Erickson and seconded by Johnson to dispense with the reading of the minutes of
the previous meeting. Motion carried.
The following resolution was read: No. 4
WHEREAS, The Bayfield County Board of Supervisors concurs with the Wisconsin Department of
Transportation in the opinion that rail service will become more essential to Wisconsin
R
Communities as the energy shortage intensifies., and
VVcl
l
WHEREAS, Chicago Northwestern Railroad has proposed to abandon lines between Washburn and
1 3
2
Rhinelander, and
v
WHEREAS, The quality of rail service in Bayfield County is deteriorating to the point of
jeopardising the future economic welfare of Bayfield County as the people are dependent on
efficient transportation for shipping and receiving products in Bayfield County,
0 oo
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors, in session on
Tuesday, May 27, 1980, establish a Bayfield County Transportation Commission, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, This commission be composed of the members of the Bayfield County
Land Sales and Development Committee, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That this commission be authorized to investigate methods of
saving Bayfield County railroads, enter into cooperative agreements with other arms of government
and to negotiate with investors who might preserve railroad service in Bayfield County.
Submitted by: Joel Bromberg
Moved by Bromberg and seconded by Renoos to adopt the resolution.
Bromberg then informed the board that he had drafted this resolution from a sample copy
resolution which was going'before other county boards.
The'clerk then read a letter from Vilas County for informational purposes.
Soderstrom then questioned as to who would have to do all the necessary work involved
with this matter.
Bromberg then stated that the work would probably be done through the clerk's office.
Ludzack added that a great amount of the work could be done by the Northwest Regional
Planning Commission.
27. 1980
Johnson stated that the Commission would, if requested by the County, get involved with
the matter. He further stated that the county should look to the Commission as a resource.
The question was asked on the motion to adopt Resolution No. 4.
Motion carried.
The following letter and relocation order were read: No. 5
State of Wisconsin
Department -of Transportation
P.O. Box 7916
Madison, WI 53707
May 2, 1980
Mr. Lawrence C. Young, Commissioner
Bayfield County Highway Department
Box 428
311 South First Ave. East
Washburn, WI 54891
Mr. Edward A. Pajala
Bayfield County Clerk_
Courthouse.,
Washburn, WI 54891
Dear Sirs:
Project 8161-00-21 F 100(1)
U.S.H. 2-Washburn Road
S.T.H. 13
Bayfield County
The Department of Transportation deems it necessary to make certain revisions on a previously
approved right of way plat and to acquire certain lands and interests in lands, according to
such revisions, for the proper improvement or maintenance of the above designated project and
highway, The revised relocation order of the Department and the map showing the highway as
laid out and established and the lands and interests to be acquired are transmitted herewith.
The enclosed relocation order provides that the necessary acquisitions of lands and interests
not previously acquired shall be made by the Division of Highways and Transportation Facilities,
pursuant to Section 84.09(1) or (2), Wisconsin Statutes.
Sincerely,
H.L. Fiedler
Administrator
HLF:ld
Enc.
cc: DD# 8
R/E
RELOCATION ORDER
Project: 8161-00-21 F 100(1)
Highway : S.T.H. 13 County: Bayfield
Plat Sheet Numbers: 4.0 through 4.14
Name of Road: U.S.H. 2-Washburn Road
Right of Way Plat Date: April 8, 1980
Date of Previous Order: December 5, 1979
Description of Termini of Project: Beginning at a point 1320.82 feet S. 89016'58" E and 1399.67
feet S. 1034'16" W. of the center of Section 35, Township 48 North, Range 5 West, thence
northeasterly to a point 3959.90 feet 88057'09" E. and 4151.06 feet N 0000'00" E of the southwest
cornor of Section 6. Township 48 North, Range 4, West.
To properly establish, widen, enlarge, extend, construct, reconstruct, improve, or maintain a
portion of the highway designated above, it is necessary to relocate or change and acquire
certain lands or interest in,lands as shown on the right of way plat for the above project.
To effect this change, pursuant to authority granted under Sections 84.02(3) and 84.09, Wisconsin
Statutes, the Department of Transportation hereby orders that:
1. The said highway is hereby laid out and established to the lines and widths as shown on the
plat.
2. The required lands or interests in lands as shown on the plat shall be acquired by the
Division of Highways and Transportation Facilities, in the name of the State of Wisconsin,
pursuant to the provisions of Section 84.09(1) or (2), Wisconsin Statutes.
3. This order supersedes and amends any previous. order issued by the Department.
Dated: April 24, 1980 Signed: H.L. Fiedler, Administrator
27, 1980
Moved by Seidel and seconded by Diamon to receive the letter and order and place them
on file. Motion carried.
The following lettv.r was read: No. 6
Box 2871, Star Route
Barnes, WI 54873(1)
May 5, 1980
Governor Lee Dreyfus
State Capitol
Madison, WI 53702
Senator Dan Theno
Ashland, WI 54806
Representative David Kedrwoski
Washburn, WI - 54891
Dear Sirs:
On April 30 I attended a meeting in Hayward sponsored by WCBA and was appalled to learn that
the Northern third of Wisconsin will no longer have a representative on the 7-man State DNR
Board. In fact, this will be the first time in 53 years.
We in the Northland come in contact with the DNR daily, and I believe it is unreasonable for
the .powers to be in the State not to give us representation.
Sincerely,
Swen Soderstrom
Supervisor
Bayfield County
cc: Washburn-Bayfield County Times
The Daily Press, Ashland
evening Telegram, Superior
Sawyer County Record, Hayward
Riverway Echo, Minong
Bayfield County Board
Town 7Board of Barnes
Town Board of Drummond
Moved by Bromberg and seconded by Rave to receive the letter and place it on file.
Motion carried.
NTn F, a
Moved by Erickson and seconded by Diamon that a resolution be drawn up on the matter and
mailed to the proper authorities. Motion carried.
Art Meierotto arrived at this time.
l-
No.7
Don Wilson and Don Chatfield, Department of Transportation addressed the board about the
possibility of providing federal funds for the resurrection of the transit system between
Red Cliff, Washburn, Ashland, and Odanah.
Wilson informed the board that an application could be made for a federal grant which
would cover 80% of the initial cost of purchase of equipment and other costs related to
beginning the operation and the grant would also cover 50% of any deficit in the operation of
the system.
Seidel then questioned if the federal monies that would be received for this project
would be a one time grant or a continua:l..grant.
24
27, 1980
Wilson answered that federal funds provided through these acts recognize continuing needs
and he would expect Congress to extend this program just like other programs of this nature.
Erickson asked if the buses used '.would be new buses or if.,. they would be older buses.
Wilson answered that he had hoped to see that newer equipment would be used in the transit
system. He envisioned that they would have two buses operating and one in reserve.
Erickson also questioned if it would be a donation service.
Wilson answered that there would be a reasonable fixed fare for use of the transit system.
Ludzack questioned if this program could be expanded so that it could cover more of the
county.
Wilson stated that at present that would be too large scale a project but it is definitely
a thought for the future.
Wilson then informed the board that the Red Cliff Tribal Council is supportive of the
program and is willing to make application for funding.
Anderson questioned if it would be possible to use commercial buses that are already in
existence.
Wilson answered that it would be ppssible to -lease the buses rather than to purchase.
Diamon suggested that the Board Chairman appoint a committee of three members from the
townships involved to work with the Department of Transportation on this matter.
Moved by Bromberg and seconded by McGillivray that the County Board Chairman appoint a
committee of three members from the townships, involved to work with the Department of Transpor.=
tation on the system.
Alroll call vote was taken with the following results: No. 7a
Ayes - Bromberg, McGillivray, Seidel, Johnson
Nayes - Erickson, Meierotto, Barningham, Maki, Strom, Rave, Soderstrom, Carter, Diamon,
Anderson, Wickman, Ludzack, Renoos
Absent - Sechen
Ayes - 4
Nayes -13
Absent - 1
TOTAL 18
Motion lost.
Moved by Anderson and seconded by Rave to approve the presentation made by the Department
of Transportation and approve of 'the study. Motion carried.
No. 7C,
Moved by Renoos and seconded by Ludzack to appoint the County Land Sales Committee to
work with the Board of Transportation on this matter. Motion carried.
Ma
The following resolution was read: No._8
WHEREAS, There is presently in effect in Bayfield County a comprehensive Zoning and
Sanitary Ordinance, and,
WHEREAS, C.J. Kontny, a property owner, residing on a parcel of land located in the
North-East One -Quarter (NEµ) of the North-East One -Quarter (NE-,[), of Section Twenty -Six (26) ,
Q Township Forty -Seven (47) North, Range Six (6) West, Town of Keystone, allegedly did locate
on his property a mobile home, did construct an addition to his existing dwelling, and did
substantially alter an existing private domestic sewage treatment disposal system without
first obtaining a land use and sanitary permit, and,
WHEREAS, Said alleged activities are contrary to the terms of Sections 2.01 and 2.05
of the Bayfield County Zoning Ordinance and Sections 2.1 and 3.1 of the Bayfield County
Sanitary Ordinance, and,
WHEREAS, Said'C.J. Kontny has failed to initiate action to rectify this matter, and,
WHEREAS, The Bayfield County Zoning Committee has recommended that an action be commenced
against said C.J. Kontny for the violation of the,provisions of said ordinances and for such
relief as may be appropriate and,
WHEREAS, Said ordinances require Bayfield County Board approval before such action is
instituted,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Zoning Committee recommends that the Bayfield
County Board of Supervisors authorize the Bayfield County District Attorney to commence such
action as may be appropriate for such alleged illegal acts, and to cause compliance with
the terms of said Zoning and Sanitary Ordinances,and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That any penalties involved shall conform with the violation
provisions of Section 15.0 of the Ba.yfield County Zoning Ordinance and Section 10.0 of the
Bayfield County Sanitary Ordinance.
Dated: May 27, 1980
Signed: Renoos, McGillivray, Soderstrom, Bromberg, Maki, Barningham
Moved by Bromberg and seconded by Strom to adopt the resolution.
Dave Lee then updated the board as to the events that happened since the County Board had
directed the Zoning Committee to meet with Kontny and how to -date Kontny still has not made
an attempt to correct the problems.
George Koval, Chairman Town of Keystone,then addressed the board informing them of the
meeting the town board also had with Kontny.
The question was asked on the motion to adopt Resolution No. 8.
Motion carried.
No. 9
Jane Schumacker, ombudsman from the Governor's office, then addressed the board. She stated
that her main purpose of coming before the board was to introduce herself to them and to let
them know what services are available through her program. She explained the legal services
that are provided to the elderly and disabled,& how she is involved with nursing home concerns
and consumer protection. She explained that her services are available to anyone 60 years of
age or older or anyone who has a handicap. She also added that there is no income criteria for
her to follow. She also gave the board the following toll free number to call in
f
Hayward: 1-800-242-1060.
The following resolution was read:' No. 10
WHEREAS, The per diem for County Board Committees other than regular committees has usually
been set at the same rate as the per diem paid to County Board members attending committee
meetings and
WHEREAS, No provisions have been made for establishing the per diem for the members of the
51.42 board, now therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the per.diem and mileage paid to members of the 51.42 board be established
to be the same rate as paid to County Board members attending regular committee meetings and be
it further
RESOLVED, That in the event that the per diem or mileage paid to County Board members is
adjusted, the mileage rate and the per diem for 51.42 board members will be adjusted accordingly.
Signed: Johnson, Seidel, Renoos, Carter, Barningham
Moved by Seidel and seconded by Johnson to adopt the resolution. Motion carried.
The following letter and resolution were read: No. 11 and lla
Arlene Weiss
12421 Dairy Ashford
Houston, TX 77099
May 23, 1980
Mr. Edward Pajala
Bayfield County Clerk
Washburn, WI 54891
Dear Mr. Pajala:
Thank you for bringing to my attention the tax deed notice on my property (Lot 118 of the
Woodcrest Addition to Wilde River).- I was not aware of this situation prior to your recent letter
and would have expected notification at my Texas address as taxes have been paid the past —wo
years from this address.
Concerning the omissions on my part --let me reiterate our phone conversation:
Tax of 1973: I had been told, verbally, at the time of purchase that I bore no responsibility for
the first years' tax. Never having purchased any property prior to that point I
did not check the contract for�conf irmation until your letter. Thus, I acknowledge
my omission.
Tax of 1975: Examination of old checkbooks and checks revealed that check number 785, dated
March 31, 1976, for $144.89 was issued to Bayfield County. That check, however, is
missing and apparently was never cashed.
Tax of 1976: I have no record for payment of this tax. Constant business traveling, the move
to Texas, and the resulting confusion would partially account for my negligence.
Subsequent to getting settled here, I did notify Joann Lang about my non -receipt of my 1978
statement. Shortly thereafter I received the statement and paid accordingly. Furthermore, the
1979 taxes were paid February 9, 1980, which is subsequent to the county taking deed. To satisfy
this situation, I have enclosed full payment and request County Board redemption.
Again, Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention.
Very truly yours,
Arlene Weiss
Si
May 27, 1980
No. 11a
WHEREAS, Bayfield County is the owner of Lot 118, Woodcrest Addition to Wilde River, Town
of Cable, and
WHEREAS, Bayfield County acquired the aforesaid parcel of land by a tax deed taken on
December 281 1979 for the delinquent tax of 1973, Sale of 1974, and
WHEREAS, A letter addressed to Arlene Weiss, former owner of the property, was mailed by
certified mail to Arlene Weiss at 1317 Braumell, Evanston, IL 60202, on September 20, 1979,
which letter was returned unclaimed due to the fact that the aforesaid Arlene Weiss had moved
to Houston, Texas, and
WHEREAS,Arlene Weiss did pay the 1974, the 1977, and the 1978 tax prior to the time that
the county took a deed on the 1973 tax, and
WHEREAS, Arlene Weiss did pay the 1979 tax to Joann Lang, Treasurer, Town of Cable, on
the aforesaid parcel of land unaware of the fact that the county had taken a tax deed on the
land, and
WHEREAS, The County Clerk has now notified Arlene Weiss of the fact that the county has
taken a deed on her property and said Arlene Weiss has indicated that she would desire to
redeem her property and has, in fact, mailed a check to the County Clerk in the amount of
$622.25, which covers the delinquent tax of 1973, 1975 and 1976, plus interest and other charges,
now therefore be it
RESOLVED, That Arlene Weiss be allowed to redeem Lot 118, Woodcrest Addition to Wilde
River, and that the County Clerk be authorized and directed to issue to Arlene Weiss a quit
claim deed on the aforesaid Lot 118, Wilde River Addition, Town of Cable.
Signed: Johnson, Carter, Meierotto, Seidel, Renoos, Barningham
Moved by Johnson and seconded by Renoos to adopt the resolution and to receive the letter
and place it on file. Motion carried.
The following letter was read: No. 12
Department of Social Services
Bayfield County
Washburn, WI 54891
May 27, 1980
Mr. Walter Barningham, Chairman `
Bayfield County Board
Washburn, WI 54891
Dear Mr. Barningham:
The Bayfield County Unit on Aging requests the following individuals to be appointed to the
Unit for the following terms:
1.
Clara McConnel, Assistant Director R.S.V.P.
3
years-
2.
Ernest "Jack" Nelson
3
years
3.
Egnar Johnson
3
years
4.
Evelyn Stone
3
years
S.
Mildred Olson
3
years
6
Doris X07t.va :n
2
years
7.
Kenneth Howell
2
years
S.
Rev. Joseph Jenkins "`
2
years
9.
Ray Kyle
1
year
10.
Mr. Chaffie
1
year
11.
Mrs. Chaffie
1
year
12.
Bill Carter
1
year
13.
Joel Bromberg
1
year
14.
Albin Larson
1
year
Very truly yours,
Louis J. Stolle, Director
Bayfield County Unit on Aging
LJS:bb
d
C
3
V
Moved by Seidel and seconded by Diamon to approve the appointments and to receive the
letter and place it on file.
Motion carried.
No. 13
Lou Stolle, Director, Unit on Aging,then addressed'the board informing the new members of
what the county agin Unit is and gave the whole board an up -date of the U.nit's activities. He
informed the board that the Unit came into effect last May and during that year they have
established an information referral telephone, a transportation program funded through the state,
an escort program, supportive home care program and they are developing a home maintenance and
repair program. This concluded Stoll.e's presentation.
No. 14
Moved by Johnson and seconded by Erickson that Karl Ludzack be appointed to the CEP Board
to replace H. Glenn Spears. Motion carried.
No. 15
Moved by Strom and seconded by Wickman that Hazel Maki be appointed to the Bayfield
County Housing Authority Board. Motion carried.
Moved by Erickson and seconded by Seidel to adjourn for lunch. Motion carried.
The meeting was called to -order at 1:05 p.m. by Chairman Walter Barningham.
The following members answered roll call; No. 16
Present - Erickson, Meierotto, Barningham, Maki., McGillivray, Strom, Rave, Soderstrom, Johnson,
Carter, Diamon, Anderson, Wickman, Ludzack, Renoos
Absent - Bromberg, Seidel, Sechen
Present - 15
Absent - 3
TOTAL 18
No. 17
Bob Becker, Assistant District Director Department of Natural Resources, and Jerry
Rickhoff, Area Supervisor Department of Natural Resources, next gave a presentation on the
Bibon Swamp area. They informed the board that shortly Environmental Impact Statements
would be sent to them, he added that there are two parts to this study - the draft stage
and the information received at the public hearing which is t❑ be held on July 2.
Joel Bromberg arrived at this time.
Becker also stated that he would like to request a meeting for the first-half of July
with the Executive Committee when the Environmental Impact Statement is out.
This concluded the presentation from the D.N.R.
27. 1980
0,
The following resolution was read: No® 18
WHEREAS, An appointment has been made to the Board of the Department of Natural Resources
to replace Steve Pavich, a resident of Bayfield County, and
WHEREAS, The new appointee is from the southern portion of the State of Wisconsin, and
WHEREAS, The recent appointment leaves the entire northern one third portion of the
State of Wisconsin without representation on the Board of the Department of Natural Resources, ant
WHEREAS, This lack of representation of the northern one third of the State of Wisconsin on
the Board of Natural Resources has not been experienced in the last 53 years, and
WHEREAS_, .It is very important to not only the northern portion of the State,'but to the
entire State that representation on the Board of the Department of Natural Resources be
apportioned through all areas of the State, now therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Bayfield County Board go on record in opposition to the lack of
representation on the said Board, and be it further,
RESOLVED, That an effort be_made to apportion the State into seven (7) separate districts,
with each district being represented by one member so as to provide representation on the
Board from all areas of -the State.
LAND SALES AND. DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE: McGillivray, Soderstrom Renoos, Erickson, Meierotto,
Barningham
Moved by Erickson and seconded by Soderstrom to adopt the resolution. Motion carried.
Larry Seidel arrived at this time.
No. 19
Sue Gatts, Emergency Government Director, next addressed the board on the TT9111t System
saying that Bayfield County had submitted a grant application for " 911" and the application
had been denied. Gatts then proceeded to read to the board a letter she had received from
the State denying the application. The letter stated that the reason for denial was because
a resolution in favor of "91111 was not passed and submitted by the board to the State before
the filing date of January 31.
Anderson then questioned Gatts about what is the county's responsibility in the "91111
system.
Gatts answered that the county's responsibility would be implementing the system and the
cost for the county would be the mileage rates from the telephone company to the communication
center. The telephone company would absorb the cost of the main equipment.
The following letter was read: No,. 20
May 22, 1980
TO: BAYFIELD COUNTY BOARD MEMBERS
BAYFIELD COUNTY BOARD
COURTHOUSE
WASHBURN, WISCONSIN -54891
FROM: R. W. FREDERICKS, BAYFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF
RE: BAYFIELD COUNTY JAIL
My sincere regrests for not being able to attend your May 27 County Board meeting. I would
like to be there to personally convey the following information. Previous committments
require my presence elsewhere.
During your May 27th meeting you will receive a report on a recent joint meeting between the
27, 1980
Ashland and Bayfield Coynt Sheriff's Coguitt es Iam taking this.opportunity to submit my
own repor an personne o inion as dirktion the County should -proceed -in this very
important Jail issue.
For the past year I have investigated the pros and cons of consolidated Jail use. I have
finally come to the conclusion that this would not be the best direction to proceed. My
reasons for reaching this conclusion are as follows.
1. Economically, a consolidated,effort may or may not be feasible. There is a possibility that
over a long period of time this County could save a few dollars. I have serious doubts
that a consolidated effort could continue to be maintained over thislength of time..
2. Regardless of how a consolidated effort was administered, Bayfield County would not have
full control. Without this ability to control..a security institution of our own, we will
not be adequately able to meet all of the' ne.ed's of 'Bayfield County prisoners.
3. The problem of transportation of prisoners will still be in existence. It requires a
considerable amount of time and energy to transport these prisoners. It also creates
problems with Court schedules and Court appearances. The inconvenience to attorneys,
probation and parole people, alcohol and drug counselors as well as members of the
prisoners', families have to be considered.
4. A consolidated effort will have to include the dispatching services. The Bayfield County
Sheriff's Department dispatches not only all of the police agencies in the County, we also
dispatch for nine ambulances and two fire departments -with the -expected addition of several
more fire departments in the near future. Dispatching also covers the monitoring of alarm
systems (burglary and fire) as well as -radio systems for the Federal Forestry and Bayfield
County Highway Dept. Should the two counties combine these services, it will be necessary
to hire additional staff people to act as Jailers. No longer will the dual role of
jailer -dispatcher be practical. Bayfield County, operating its own institution, will be
able to continue using these people in a dual role, and'also continue to provide adequate
attention to both positions. The technical aspects of consolidated ,dispatching will be
extremely expensive and difficult to overcome. Telephone and radio systems will both require
major alterations. These alterations could result in some of the services provided by this
office being terminated. Here again, we would be losing -some local control-
These four points are of primary concern to an effective operating procidure for a Bayfield
County Jail. There are also many other items which are too lengthy to be considered at this
time. With all due consideration, and after careful study and evaluation, I have determined
that the possible savings are not justified by the benefits to be lost, as well as the incon-
venience of the enter operation. Therefore I am urgipg you at this time to give your support
to the building of a new jail attached to the rear of the rest home building, and remodeling
the existing structure for utilization asp-Bayfield County Law Enforcement Center.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Respectfully submitted,
R.W. Fredericks
Bayfield County Sheriff
cc: Edward A. Pajala, Bayfield County Clerk
William Bussey, Bayfield County District Attorney
Robert Ledin, Bayfield County Circuit Judge.
Moved by Bromberg and seconded by Meierotto to receive the letter and place it on file.
Motion carried.
The following resolution was read: No. 21
WHEREAS, The County Board did at their April 15 meeting direct the Bayfield County
Sheriff and the Sheriff's Committee to meet together with the Ashland County Sheriff and the
Ashland County Sheriff's Committee to further discuss the possibility of joint jail use and
WHEREAS, Said joint committees did meet on May 3 and did discuss the matter at length and
WHEREAS, By unanimous vote passed a motion recommending that both Ashland and Bayfield
County continue the study of joint jail use.-aow therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Bayfield County Sheriff's Committee together with the Sheriff further
study the matter of joint Ashland--Bayfield County jail use.
SHERIFF'S COMMITTEE: Ludzack, Anderson, Barningham, Maki, Wickman
Moved by Anderson and seconded by Maki to adopt.
27, 1980
Dale Maki, Chairman of the Sheriff's Committee, then reported on the previous meeting
of the.Ashland--Bayfield County.Sheriff�' Committees.
Strom then questioned if it was legal to spend Bayfield County tax dollars.to remodel
another county's jail.. He also wondered if it was legal to commit either county , to a
long term agreement.
Renoos stated that he was in favor of 'Bayfield.Cgu-nty building their own jail and he
felt that the county should not go on with the joint jail study._
Chief deputy Neff then informed the board of the reasons why Sheriff Fredericks changed
his mind on continuing, the joint jail study. One of the reasons-was.the legal problems
that would be encounter-ed with the consolidation and also Fredericks felt. that the expenses,
espec.lally for the dispatching service, would cost Bayfield County more than Ashland County
for the suvitch.
The question was asked on the motion to adopt Resolution No. 21.
A roll call vote was taken with the following results: No,. 21a
Ayes - Ludzack
Nayes - Erickson, Meierotto, Barningham, Bromberg, Maki, McGillivray, Seidel, Strom, Rave,
Soderstrom, Johnson, Carter, Diamon, Anderson, Wickman, Renoos
Absent - Sechen
Ayes
- 1
Nayes
- 16
Absent
- 1
TOTAL
18
Motion lost.
No. 22
Moved by Strom and ,seconded by Wickman to authorize the Executive Committee to proceed with
the plans and spgc fications for the renovation of the old Rest Home and that dunding for the
plans and specifications now estimated to be approximately $30,000 up to the bid letting stage
be taken from the segregated building fund.
A roll call.vo.te was..taken with the following results:. No. 22a
Ayes - Erickson, Meierotto,..:Barningham, Bromberg,_Maki, McGillivray, Seidel, Strom, Rave,
Soderstrom, Johnson, Carter, Diamon, Anderson, Wickman, Ludzack, Renoos
Nayes - None
Absent - Sechen
Ayes - 17
Nayes 0
Absent - 1
TOTAL 18
Motion carried.
27, 1980
The following resolution was read: No. 23
WHEREAS, A letter was presented to the Bayfield County. Board from the Bayfield County
Publishing, Inc. on April 15 providing for new r ates for publishing legal items in the Washburn
Times and Iron.River.Pioneer and
WHEREAS, It .was noted at that time that there. was a slight mathematical -error in the rates
included in the letter and '
WHEREAS, The county board did at the April 15 meeting direct the Executive Committee to
further revie% the proposed new rates and
WHEREAS, The Executive Committee has met with Dan Satran representing the.Bayfield County
Publishing, Inc., and
WHEREAS, Dan Satran did prepare and present to the committee a new -schedule of rates correct-
ing the original error and
it
WHEREAB., The Executive Committee has approved the new proposed rates now therefore be
RESOLVED, That the rates shown in the letter received from Bayfield County Publishing, Inc.,
which is attached to and made a part of this resolution and which have'been approved by the
Executive Committee be approved, and be it further
RESOLVED, That said rates shall be in effect from the period beginning May 1, 1980,
through April 30, 1981.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Johnson, Carter, Seidel, Meierotto, Renoos, Barningham
Bayfield County Publishing
Washburn, WI 54891
Bayfield County Board
Edward A. Pajala, Clerk
Courthouse
Washburn, WI 54891
Dear Mr. Pajala:
The following are revised figures that will result in a 12 percent increase in legal rates
charged to Bayfield County.
The total amount listed in the earlier letter was correct, but due to a change in the size of
our columns from two years ago, there was a flaw in the table.
Everything in the previous letter, except this. table still applies. including our request that
rates only be good for a one-year period of time.
You can be assured that the legals will appear in the three newspapers, offering the best
covering of Bayfield County.
TIMES PIONEER/PRESS TOTAL
LEGAL MAXIMUM RATE lst insertion lst insertion lst insertion
WE CAN CHARGE /line - $.213 /line - $.213 /line - $.426
/inch - 1.70 /inch.- 1.70. /inch - 3.40
2nd and Subs., 2nd and Subs. ; 2nd and Subs.
insertions insertions- insertions
/line - $.169 /line - $®169 /line - $.338
/inch - 1.35 /inch - 1.35 /inch - 2.70
RATE PRESENTLY BEING lst insertion
CHARGED /line - $.195
/inch - 1.46
,2nd and Subs
insertions
/line - $.156
/inch - 1.17...
lst insertion
/line - $.02925
/inch - .22
2nd and Subs.
insertions
/line - $.0233
/inch - .176
lst insertion
/line-$.2242
/inch - 1.68
2nd and Subs.
insertions
/line - $.179
/inch - 1.34
PROPOSED 1980 RATE lst insertion
lst insertion
lst insertion
/line - $.213
/line-$.022
/line - $.235
/inch - 1.70
/inch - _,,188
/inch - 1.88
2nd and Subs.
2nd and Subs.
2nd and Subs.
insertions
insertions
insertions
/line - $.169
/line - $.018
Ili.ne - $.187
/inch - 1.35
/inch - .150
/inch - 1/50
Thank you,
Dan Satran, Leslie Satran
27. 1980
Moved by Carter and seconded by Bromberg to adopt the resolution. Motion carried.
The following correspondence -was -read: No. 24'
Rasmussen & Ball
Attorneys at Law
2116 Second Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55404
May 7, 1980
Mr. David Lee
Bayfield County Zoning Administrator
Bayfield County Courthouse
Washburn, WI 54891
Re: Our client Bayfield Recreational Development, Inc.
Dear Mr. Lee:
Our firm represents Bayfield Recreational Development, Inc.
Bayfield Recreational Development, Inc. hereby applies to amend the Bayfield County Zoning
Ordinance by changing the zoning district from forestry to residential -recreational.
The Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SEµ of NWµ), the East Half of the Southwest
Quarter (E 2 of SW µ) , and the West Half of the Southeast Quarter (W z of SEµ) , all in
Section Twenty-nine (29) , Township Fifty (50) North, Range Four (4) West, Town of
Bayfield, Bayfield County, Wisconsin.
The land in question includes the Port Mountain ski area. The purpose of the proposed amendment
is to allow a limited number of residential lots at choice locations within the ski area. We
expect that the sale of these lots will strengthen the financial base of Port Mountain and
increase the tax base 'of Bayfield County as -well. Needless to say, any subdivision'or planned
unit development will be done only after consultation with county staff and will be in
complete'com'pliance'with all county regulations.
I have also enclosed our firm check in the amount of $25:'00 to cover the filing fee:.
We would appreciate your prompt attention to our request.
Very truly yours,
RASMUSSEN & BALL
Bruce A. Rasmussen
cc: Mr. Robert F. Holmgren, Bayfield Recreational Development, Inc., Mr. .Stan Stevenson,
Stevenson Realty
TO: Town Board
Town of Hughes
Bayfield County
FROM: Fred McGehee "
DATE: May 1, 1980
Enclosed is a photo copy of'property owned''by Fred'McGehee. I would like -to have the property
that the Green Top sets on the triangle re -zoned commercial. Also I would like the bordering
or adjacent highway frontage lying East of Deep Lake Road re -zoned commercial for about 500
feet from Highway 2 South.
If I can have a letter from the Town Board approving this proposal, I will take the letter and
photo copy of property to Zoning Board in Washburn for approval.
Thank you.
Fred McGehee
Green Top Supper Club
Box 125A. I.,'
Iron River, WI 54847
(Approved by Town of Hughes Town Board at regular meeting.., May 1, 1980. Chairman Stanley
Szegygiel, Supervisors Glenn Teppu and Gary Peterson, C1erk'Carolos Gerlach)
Bayfield Connty Zoning Committee
We, the Town Board, Town of Barnes, do hereby approve of the issuance ofa permit to Fulton
Fahrner and Eugene & Mulcana Fahrner located in NWµ of the NWµ Section 3, Township 44N,
Range 9 W, Town of Barnes for change of zoning to RR as was granted to all other resort
owners because of fairness.
Signed: Town of Barnes Town Board - Peter Pease, Chara.ene Soderstrom, Shirley Rice, Jean Barker
27- 1980
N
Bayfield County Zoning Committee
We, The Town Board, Town of Barnes, do hereby approve of the issuance of a permit to Stanley
Barnes located in SW4 of the NWµ Section 28, Township 45N, Range 9 W, Town of Barnes for
\change zoning from Forestry to Agriculture 1 Use.
Signed: Town of Barnes Town Board-- Peter Pease, Muleana Fahrner, Shirley Rice, Jean Barker
Moved by Renoos and seconded by Bromber to receive the correspondence and place it on file.
Motion carried.
The following resolution was read: No. 25
WHEREAS, By action of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors, the Bayfield County Rest
Home for our elderly has been closed and
WHEREAS, Doctor Telford iaas served as medical director of the Bayfield County Rest Home
since July 13, 1967, and
WHEREAS,.During that period of time Doctor.Telfbrd has served Bayfield County diligently
and faithfully both as a medical director.and as a friend and has; unselfishly devoted much of
his time to„the care and comfort ,of the residents of the Bayfield County Rest Home, now, therefore
be it
RESOLVED, That .the Board of Trustees of the.Bayfield County Rest Home together with the
County Board go,..on record expressing to Doctor•Telford the appreciation of the Board of
Trustees and of the Bayfield County Board and his services to the residents of the Bayfield
County Rest Home and be it further
RESOLVED, That this resolution be made a part of the official record of the Bayfield
County Board and be it further
RESOLVED, That a copy of this resolution be mailed to Doctor Telford.
SIGNED- Walter Barningham
Moved by Seidel and seconded by Diamon to adopt the resolution . Motion carried.
The following resolution was read: No. 26
WHEREAS, By action of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors, the. Bayfield County
Rest Home for out elderly has been closed and
WHEREAS, The Rest Home was -operated under the direction of.an administrator and a Board
of Trustees, and
WHEREAS, The administrator and the Board of Trustees have always faithfully acted to
operate the home in'a manner to provide the elderly residents the best possible service and
care at the least possible minimum cost and
WHEREAS, The level of care provided the residents of the home was always excellent which
has been attested to by the satisfaction of the residents as well as the families_of the residents
of the home, now therefore be it
RESOLVED,"That the,Bayfield County Board.in session this 27th day of May, 1980, go on
record expressing the appreciation of the beard and of Bayfield County to Administrator Ann
Bratley, Chairman of the Board Leo Lay and Robert Philby and Carolyn Sneed, members of the
Board of Trustees and be it further
RESOLVED, That copies of this resolution be mailed.to the administrator and the Board of
Trustees.
Signed; Walter Barningham
May 27, 1980
Moved by Johnson and seconded by Soderstrom to .ado:pt the resolution. Motion carried.
The following letter and resolution from Douglas County were Read: No. 27 & 27a
Raymond Somerville
County Clerk'
Douglas County
Superior, WI
May 14, 1980
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
117 E. 5th St.
Washburn, WI 54891
Dear County Board Members:
Enclosed is a resolution passed by the Douglas County Board of Supervisorsat their May 8th
meeting regarding the University of Wisconsin -Superior. A motion was also passed that a copy
of this resolution be sent of the other ten Northern counties requesting their support in
this :matter.
You may be sure we appreciate your efforts on our behalf.
Sincerely,
Raymond'H. Somerville
Douglas County Clerk
No. 27a
RESOLUTION #26-80
RESOLUTION BY THE DOUGLAS COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Subject: Support continuance of U.UA.S.,+Superior
WHEREAS,..the.University.of_Wisconsin-Superior has a historyof eighty-four years -of educa-
tional service to the citizens of the State of Wisconsin, the citizens of Northwestern Wisconsin,
and particularly the citizens of Douglas County, and
WHEREAS, The University of Wisconsin -Superior has the longest history of continued
accreditation of any state institution of higher education in Wisconsin and an impressive
and distinguished history of academic achievement and excellence, and
WHEREAS, the thousands of University of Wisconsin -Superior graduates have.distinguished
themselves in positions of responsibility and service in all parts of the wor.ld,.the nation,
the state and the region, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Douglas County recognizes the academic, cultural ,and
economic importance of the Superior campus to citizens of the -entire region, and.
WHEREAS, the Board is in full agreement with the "Wisconsin Idea" of equal access to educa-
tion for all of the states citizens,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Douglas County, Wisconsin,
supports the continuance of the University of Wisconsin -Superior as a strong and viable
educational institution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors urges the University.of Wisconsin
Board of Regents, the UW System President, the State Legislature., the Governor, the UW-Superior
Administration and all others who may be involved.and interested in the future of the region to
find new missions and/or programs and/ur other means to increase enrollment to insure that
UW-Superior continues to serve Northuestern Wisconsin as admirably as it has in the past.
BE IT STILL FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board..of Supervisors intends -to lend its full
support to such efforts.
Dated this 8th day of May, 1980.
May 27, 1980
Moved for adoption by Supervisor Andresen, seconded by Supervisor Stilwell. Supervisor
Finn moved that this be amended that the other 10 Northern counties send resolutions supporting
this also, seconded by Supervisor Stilwell. Carried by Voice vote. Resolution as amended,
earried by voice vote.
Supervisor Andresen then introduced Jay Griffith member of the U.W.S. Basketball team and
Mr. Griffith introduced three new transfer members of the team. .Coach Gleboff was not able to
be present.
Moved by Bromberg and seconded by Strom to support the Douglas County Resolution.
Motion carried.
The following letter was read: No. 28
Overholser Funeral Home
17 So. First St.
Bayfield,- WI 54814
May 15, 1980
Bayfield County Board 1 ..
RE: Non -asset welfare funeral allowance.
Gentlemen:
We have been informed by the Wisgonsin Funeral Directors Association, that:
"Chapter 206 increasing the non -asset welfare funeral allowance from $300.00 to
$600.00 becomes law tomorrow, May-8th - your county welfare director (and likely
County Board) must first approve any increase."
We are at this time, then,'respectfully asking the Board for serious consideration in this regard.
With today's inflated prices,..the current allowance of $300.00,does not even cover ordinary grave
opening and closing fees (in Bayfield it is $170.00), vault charges and transportation fees
(approximately $240.00, and much higher, if a burial takes place on a weekend or holiday).
Burial receptacles and all professional fees, therefore, become gratis items..
It is not unreasonable, we feel, for us to anticiapte that the County Board and welfare
administrator would approve this new increase. We await your response..
Respectfully,
OVERHOLSER FUNERAL HOME
Joel D. Overholser, Director
Moved by,Johnson and seconded by -Bromberg to refer the matter to the.Social Services
Board. Motion carried.
The following letters were read: No.-29 & 29a-
State of Wisconsin
Department of Justice
Madison, WI 53702
April 14, 1980
Board of Supervisors of Bayfield County
Bayfield County Courthouse
117 East 5th St.
Washburn, WI 54891
-Dear Members of the Bayfield County Board
As you know;, , it ' is! my responsibility to .certify 'supplemental 'monies to counties for performing
certain law enforcement services. Under sec. 20.455(2)(d), Stats., I may make these certifications
to counties which provide..additional law enforcement services by reason of federal legislation
removing governmental control. over Indians.
I am pleased to inform you that I have certified that Bayfield County is entitled to a $2,500
supplement for providing these services..
Sincerely yours,
Bronson LaFollette
Attorney General
May 27, 1980
No. 29a
State of Wisconsin
Department of Justice
Madison, WI 53702
May 14, 1980
CERTIFIED
Mr. Edward A. Pajala
Bayfield County Clerk
Bayfield County Courthouse
117 East 5th St.
Washburn, WI 54891
Re: Indian Aid for Law Enforcement
Dear Mr. Pajala:
Enclosed herewith is State of Wisconsin check number E0203278, dated May 12, 1980, in the
amount of $2,500.00, payable to the Treasurer of Bayfield County, Wisconsin.
This is in payment of state aid for law enforcement for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1980,
pursuant to sec. 20.455 (2) (d) , Stats.
Sincerely yours,
William,H. Wilker, Administrator
Legal Services Division
By: Gail Beale, Secretary
Moved by Johnson and seconded by Anderson to receive the letter and place it on file.
Motion carried.
The following letter was read: No. 30
Lumbermen's Inn
P.O. Box 123A
Iron River, WI 54847
Bayfield County Board
Courthouse
Washburn, WI
Gentlemen:
I speak for our business, our customers and snowmobiling friends in the area when I'express
thanks to the county and personnel for the snowmobile trail groomer put into service this past
season adn for the good job done with it. A snowmobile manufacturer who had a team staying
with us for several days made a return trip for several more days due to the good trails
available here in Bayfield County.
-Our customers were all will pleased. We thank you again.
Sincerely,
Cal Miller
Moved by Bromberg and seconded by Diamon to receive the letter and place if on file.
Motion carried.
No. 31
William Hepner, Bayfield County Forestry Administrator; then addressed the board stating
that on June 26 and 27 the Forestry Administrators are having a tour of Bayfield'C_ounty and all
the board members are invited to attend. Pajala asked the board if they expected to be paid
per diem and mileage if they joined the tour or were they intending that any board member
that attends is not attending on behalf of Bayfield County. Pajala further stated that he
would like to have that question resolved before the tour takes place.
No. 32
A motion was made by Bromberg and seconded by Rave that no per diem be paid to the board
members who decide to go on the two day tour.
No. 33
Moved by Rave and seconded by Bromberg to adjourn. Motion carried.
2
Walter Bar`ningham, Board Cha' man Edward A. Pajala ounty C