Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCounty Board of Supervisors - Minutes - 11/15/2016299 Minutes of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors’ Meeting November 15, 2016 – 6:00 p.m. Bayfield County Board Room, Courthouse, Washburn, Wisconsin Chairman Pocernich called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm. A roll call was taken by Scott Fibert, County Clerk, as follows: Strand-present; Williams-absent; Coughtry- present; Miller-present; Crandall-present; Rondeau-present; Goodwin-present; Bussey- present; Fickbohm-present; Maki-present; Oswald-present; Silbert-present; Pocernich- present. Total 13: 12 present, 1 absent. A quorum was present to conduct business. The following were also present for this evening’s meeting: Mark Abeles-Allison, County Administrator; Dawn M. Bellile, Deputy County Clerk; Jan Victorson, Emergency Mgmt. Coordinator; Paul Susienka, Sheriff; Dan Clark, Chief Deputy; Ben Dufford, L&W County Conservationist; Robert Schierman, Zoning Administrator; Tim Kane, UW-Extension Educator; Thomas Toepfer, Highway Commissioner; Brenda Spurlock, Criminal Justice Coordinator; Jason Fischbach, County Ag Agent; Scottie Sandstrom, Bayfield County Economic Development Rep.; Attorney Linda Coleman. 1. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all in attendance. 2. Motion Regarding Minutes of October 18, 2016, Bayfield County Board of Supervisors’ Meeting. The Board dispensed with the reading of the minutes. To see a copy of the October 18, 2016 minutes printed in full, visit the County’s webpage at www.bayfieldcounty.org/meetings or contact the County Clerk’s office. A motion was made by Rondeau/Miller to adopt the October 18, 2016 Minutes of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors’ Meeting. The motion carried. 3. Public Comment. Tony Litwiwchuk, first wanted to thank everyone for their services and then wanted to address a few issues regarding the ATV trail issue. He is a resident on County Hwy D and has witnessed many things; homes are too close to the trails and driving habits of people continue to amaze him. There is excessive speed, u-turns in yards, passing in no passing zones. There is a lot of noise and this has become an issue. The ATV’s are usually in large groups. He is asking the Board to close the road. Steve Bollig stated that the Board was asked to open County Hwy D back in December of 2015. 2/3 of the people that live on “D” want it opened and to stay open. He further pointed out that at that time, Tony had signed the petition to open it up. He has a Petition from residents in the Town of Namakagon who wish to keep the road open, and wants this placed on file. This is a route that connects Rock Lake Rroad to Pioneer Road to Clam Lake on to the trail system. This summer when we had the flood, #204 was washed out. Any traffic that could go south had to go around Pioneer Lake to Clam Lake. Any traffic that could split, couldn’t do so because of the wash out. The Towns of Grand View and Namakagon previously sponsored the opening of this highway. He has not heard of any 300 issues regarding the ATVs. There have been 2 formal complaints made to Sheriff’s Dept., one being a person he did not know. Local businesses have generated additional revenue. He thanked the Board for the time to speak to them. Ron Pillar, has lived here since 1989 full time. The ATVs do not disturb him; he has had no incidences where there have been accidents. I can’t see why we are having this meeting when it was already passed. This has been discussed and it was approved. Kris Rockdash, Hayward Chamber of Commerce is in support of our friends and neighbors in Bayfield County. We know how important it is for our trails to be open. It is discerning when we hear about possible trail closings. He is not aware of any safety issues. He agreed that this would call for more looking at. On the issue of economic grounds, it is a key connector for route that we don’t always have. The Chamber is in support of keeping them open. Jay Traitor, stated he is a Sawyer County resident, ATV enthusiast, and wants to say that the clubs and groups that use this trail feel it is very important to connect Sawyer and Bayfield counties. We are working responsibly to keep trails open. There being no further public comment, Chairman Pocernich closed public comment. 4. Bayfield County Sheriff’s Office Presentation and Video Regarding July 11th, 2016 Flooding. Chairman Pocernich explained that the Board will be watching a video that was put together on behalf of the flooding that took place this summer, the rescue efforts, and the rescue of Deputy Dawson. Pocernich turned the meeting over to Sheriff Paul Susienka and Chief Deputy Dan Clark for a video presentation. Susienka gave a brief background of what happened that night. Clark explained what was needed to set the scene for the video. The Board and those in the audience watched the video. Clark explained that while Motorola radios are water resistant not water proof. The Motorola Company was interested in seeing the radio after the incident. They cleaned it up, put in a new battery and it is being used again today. Motorola was interested in this story as were approximately 250 others who watched both in person and via skyping. One person stated that they never hear about these types of stories, so it is nice to hear that the radios worked. It was noted that Dawson used his tourniquet to tie himself to the tree not so that he would stay in the tree, but so that the officers would find his body. With that, Clark closed his speaking. 5. Beth Meyers, State Assembly Representative, Address & Citation Presentation. Meyers was present via a video stating that both she and Janet Bewley wished they could be there in person but unfortunately could not. On behalf of both of them, Meyers stated she wanted to take this time to thank everyone for their services; to friends, family and neighbors, who made this rescue a success, and to keep up the good work. You are appreciated. Supervisor Jeremy Oswald read plaques which were presented to all of the rescue services from Beth Meyers and Janet Bewley. The services were asked to stand up and to 301 introduce themselves, and were then presented with the plaques. The towns that were involved are: Grand View Fire Department; Great Divide Ambulance Service; Mason Ambulance Service; Mason Fire Department; Namakagon Fire Department; and the Bayfield County Sheriff’s Office. The Board thanked them for all of their work and diligent service they gave to the Bayfield County communities. The Bayfield County Highway Department and Tom Toepfer, Highway Commissioner, were also thanked for their due diligence in making sure the highways and roads in Bayfield County were properly marked for closures or alternate routes. They did a tremendous job in making sure everyone would be safe. Good job to everyone! At this point, the Board took a short recess at 6:30. 6. Bayfield County Resolution 2016-62, Cooperative Law Enforcement Services between the Bayfield County Sheriff’s Office and the Red Cliff Tribe. Sheriff Susienka reported that this is an annual agreement used for law enforcement for the Red Cliff Police Department and Bayfield County. It is required by law that Red Cliff and Bayfield County agree and sign an agreement. This is before you as a Board to sign and adopt. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows: WHEREAS, the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians is a federally recognized Indian Tribe, organized under a Constitution adopted August 25, 1938, and approved on November 9, 1938, pursuant to section 16 of the Indian reorganization Act; and WHEREAS, the Tribal and Bayfield County Law Enforcement Agencies have had a history of cooperation in striving to meet the Red Cliff Community’s law enforcement needs; and WHEREAS, Wisconsin Statute 165.90 provides for the establishment of cooperative law enforcement efforts between County and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies; and WHEREAS, County and Tribal Law Enforcement Officials have worked together to develop the FY 2016 County-Tribal Law Enforcement (CTLE) Plan and grant application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors assembled this 15th day of November, 2016, does hereby encourage continued cooperation between the County and Tribal Law Enforcement Agencies and approve the 2017 County-Tribal Law Enforcement Plan and Grant Application. By Action of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman 302 A motion was made by Rondeau/Coughtry to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-62, Cooperative Law Enforcement Services between the Bayfield County Sheriff’s Department and the Red Cliff Tribe. The motion carried. 7. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-67, To Establish a Contract between the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors and Arrowhead Regional Corrections for the Housing of Juveniles. Elizabeth Skulan, DHS Director, was present to give a quick summary of the resolution. The Board dispensed the reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows: WHEREAS, Bayfield County, Wisconsin must provide detention services for Bayfield County youth who have violated local, state or federal law; and WHEREAS, the closest secure juvenile detention facilities in Wisconsin are at a greater distance than Arrowhead Regional Corrections, Duluth, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Arrowhead Regional Corrections would save Bayfield County resources if only used for short-term (under 72 hour) detentions, while it allows Bayfield County youth to be closer to home in the instance of short-term stays; and WHEREAS, Wisconsin State Statute 938.223 states “the county board of supervisors of any county may contract with one or more counties in Minnesota that operate a juvenile detention facility for the use of one or more Minnesota juvenile detention facilities;” and WHEREAS, Bayfield County shall pay for detention beds at a rate of $225 per day and Bayfield County is responsible for transportation; treatment - including Alcohol and other Drug Abuse and Mental Health Services; all medical and dental care costs; as well as education costs if the youth is detained for more than 72 hours, not including weekends and holidays; and WHEREAS, Arrowhead Juvenile Center, Duluth Minnesota is subject to inspection by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections so that Wisconsin youth may be placed there. In addition, the Arrowhead Juvenile Center must be in compliance with Chapter DOC 346 Secure Detention for Juveniles administered by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections in addition to Minnesota Rule 2960; and WHEREAS, Arrowhead Juvenile Center has indicated that there are beds available in their secure detention facility for the detention of Bayfield County juveniles; and WHEREAS, Arrowhead Regional Corrections has indicated that there are beds available in their secure detention facility for the detention of Bayfield County juveniles; and WHEREAS, the proximity of Arrowhead Juvenile Center to Bayfield County families and professionals allows greater ease and capacity for family and professional visits. 303 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors assembled this 15th day of November, 2016, will enter into a contract with Arrowhead Regional Corrections to facilitate the short-term (less than 72 hour) housing of juveniles. By Action of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman A motion was made by Strand/Crandall to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-67, To Establish a Contract Between the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors and Arrowhead Regional Corrections for the Housing of Juveniles. Discussion took place regarding the change in cost per day. The motion carried. 8. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-68, To Enable Bayfield County, as Fiscal Agent to the Aging and Disability Resource Center of the North (ADRC-N) to Establish an ADRC-N Regional Contingency Fund. Skulan explained that Bayfield County is the fiscal agent for a 5-county region. We hold funds and in the course of our audit, we need a Resolution that states that Bayfield County is holding these funds. Skulan reported that this has been reviewed and approved by the DHS committee. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows: WHEREAS, the Bayfield County Department of Human Services (DHS) has been identified as the Fiscal Agent for the Regional Aging and Disability Resource Center of the North (ADRC – N) consisting of Ashland, Bayfield, Iron, Price and Sawyer Counties; and WHEREAS, the ADRC – N requires counties that employ regional positions to provide indirect expenses and Agency Management, Support and Overhead (AMSO) for the regional positions; and WHEREAS, federal matching funds are passed through to counties for regional positions, which provides reimbursement for approximately 50% of the Counties indirect and AMSO costs for regional positions; and WHHEREAS, when there are contract funds unspent at the end of the ADRC- N’s fiscal year, the Governing Board can direct the Fiscal Agent to reimburse for some or all of the remaining 50% that counties claim for the indirect and AMSO costs of regional positions, rather than allow funds to revert back to the State; and WHEREAS, the ADRC – N may ask that counties who receive these unanticipated revenues return a portion of them to Bayfield County, the Fiscal Agent, to be held in a non-lapsing account for the Aging and Disability Resource Center of the North to be used for unanticipated, non-recurring expenses; and WHHERAS, $50,357 has been paid by partner counties at the direction of the ADRC – N Governing Board in 2015 to be held in trust by Bayfield County; WHEREAS, establishing the trust for the Aging and Disability Resource Center of the North (ADRC – N) clearly identifies that the funds do not belong to Bayfield County 304 and requires a resolution by the full County Board in order to satisfy the State and local auditors; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors assembled this 15th day of November, 2016, authorizes Bayfield County, as Fiscal Agent of the Aging and Disability Resource Center of the North, to hold ADRC – N funds in trust until such a time as they are needed to cover ADRC – N expenses. By Action of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman A motion was made by Strand/Crandall to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-68, To Enable Bayfield County, as Fiscal Agent to the Aging and Disability Resource Center of the North (ADRC-N) to Establish an ADRC-N Regional Contingency Fund. The motion carried. 9. Report of the Bayfield County Planning and Zoning Committee Regarding the Amendment of Section 13-1-107 (1.6), Code of Ordinances, Bayfield County, WI – Uniform Dwelling Code Regulations. Robert Schierman, Zoning Director, explained that a uniform dwelling code inspector looked at the language in our Ordinances. Schierman is unsure that our citizens receive the best service possible. In this process, they have learned that our ordinance language was contradictory to state statutes and have brought forth new language. It has been reviewed and approved by the Zoning Committee. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Report reads as follows: Sec. 13-1-107 Uniform Dwelling Code (UDC) Regulations. 1.6 BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED. If a person erects, rebuilds, structurally alters or converts a building in excess of 150 square feet in any twelve month period; or builds or installs a new building, within the scope of this ordinance, they shall first obtain a building permit for such work from the building inspector (excepting re-siding, re-roofing, finishing of interior surfaces and installation of cabinetry shall be exempted from permit requirements). Any structural changes or major changes to mechanical systems that involve extensions shall require permits if over the forgoing thresholds. Restoration or repair of an installation to its previous code- compliant condition as determined by the building inspector is exempted from permit requirements. The Bayfield County Planning and Zoning Committee recommendation is:  XX Be Approved Date: October 20, 2016 BAYFIELD COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE William Bussey, Dennis Pocernich, Brett Rondeau, Jeff Silbert, Fred Strand 305 A motion was made by Rondeau/Silbert to receive and place on file the report of the Bayfield County Planning and Zoning Committee Regarding the Amendment of Section 13-1-107 (1.6), Code of Ordinances, Bayfield County, WI – Uniform Dwelling Code Regulations. The motion carried. 10. Bayfield County Amendatory Ordinance, No. 2016-22, Regarding the Amendment of Section 13-1-107 (1.6), Code of Ordinances, Bayfield County, WI – Uniform Dwelling Code Regulations. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Ordinance, which reads as follows: WHEREAS, Wisconsin Statutes §59.69 (5) authorizes the County Board to adopt a zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, Wisconsin Statutes §59.69(5)(e) authorizes the County Board to amend an ordinance; and WHEREAS, Section 13-1-104 Code of Ordinances, Bayfield County, Wisconsin authorizes the County Board to make amendments to Title 13, Chapter 1 of the Code of Ordinances, Bayfield County, Wisconsin pursuant to Wisconsin Statutes §59.69; and WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of the County of Bayfield to amend language in Section 13-1-107 [1.6] Code of Ordinances, Bayfield County, Wisconsin to delete the wording “in excess of 150 square feet in any twelve month period”; and Section 1. BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED. If a person erects, rebuilds, structurally alters or converts a building in excess of 150 square feet $3,000.00 in any twelve month period, adds onto a building in excess of $3,000.00 in any twelve month period, or builds or installs a new building, within the scope of this ordinance, they shall first obtain a building permit for such work from the building inspector (excepting re-siding, re-roofing, finishing of interior surfaces and installation of cabinetry shall be exempted from permit requirements). Any structural changes or major changes to mechanical systems that involve extensions shall require permits if over the forgoing thresholds. Restoration or repair of an installation to its previous code- compliant condition as determined by the building inspector is exempted from permit requirements. Section 2. Except as specifically modified and amended by this ordinance, the Bayfield County Code of Ordinance shall remain in force and effect exactly as originally adopted and previously amended. All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with or in contravention of the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 3. SEVERABILITY. If a court of competent jurisdiction adjudges any section, clause, provision, or portion of this ordinance unconstitutional or invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage. The Bayfield County Board of Supervisors decision is: Be Approved: 306 By Action of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors Attested to by: Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman A motion was made by Rondeau/Silbert to adopt Bayfield County Zoning Amendatory Ordinance No. 2016-22, Regarding the Amendment of Section 13-1-107 (1.6), Code of Ordinances, Bayfield County, WI – Uniform Dwelling Code Regulations. Discussion took place regarding the language that Schierman presented to the Board. There are 3 paragraphs with similar language and they discussed each. It was the Zoning Committee’s recommendation that the last paragraph be used as the new language and that is what is in the Amendatory Ordinance. A motion was made to amend the motion to use the last paragraph submitted, which is the desired language for the Wisconsin Uniform Dwelling Code. A vote was taken on the amendment to the l motion which carried. A second vote was on the original motion as amended which also carried. 11. Bayfield County Ordinance No. 2016-21, Amending Bayfield County Ordinance, Chapter 3, All-Terrain Vehicles and Off-Road Motor Vehicle Operations,” Section 10-3-10 “Designated Routes.” Abeles-Allison updated the Board on the Ordinance. In 2015 Bayfield County added this as a designated ATV Route. The issue of taking it off as an ATV route came up through the Highway Committee and it was been brought to the Board for their consideration. The Board dispensed with reading the Ordinance, which reads as follows: WHEREAS, Wisconsin Statutes §59.03(2) provides that, except as elsewhere specifically provided in the statutes, the board of any county is vested with all powers of a local, legislative and administrative character; and WHEREAS, Wisconsin Statutes §59.02(2) permits the enactment of ordinances by the County Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS, Section 2-2-3, Code of Ordinances, Bayfield County, Wisconsin, authorizes County Board committees or individual supervisors to introduce proposed ordinances; and WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interest of the County of Bayfield to create subsection “e” “Adoption of Additional Standards” in Chapter 1 “Traffic and Parking” of Title 10 “Motor Vehicles and Traffic,” Code of Ordinances, Bayfield County, Wisconsin; and WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interest of the County of Bayfield that the Code of Ordinances, Bayfield County, Wisconsin, be further modified and amended in the manner hereinafter set forth. 307 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors assembled this 15th day of November, 2016, does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Chapter 3 [All-Terrain Vehicles and Off-Road Motor Vehicle Operation] of Title 10 [Motor Vehicles & Traffic] of the Code of Ordinances, Bayfield County, Wisconsin is hereby amended with the following changes and additions: 4. CTH D (CTH M to Pioneer Road) 6.07 miles should be changed to read: 4. CTH D (CTH M to Garden Lake Road) 0.89 miles. Section 2. Except as specifically modified and amended by this ordinance, the Bayfield County Code of Ordinance shall remain in force and effect exactly as originally adopted and previously amended. All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with or in contravention of the provisions of this ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 3. SEVERABILITY. If a court of competent jurisdiction adjudges any section, clause, provision, or portion of this ordinance unconstitutional or invalid, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby. Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage. Adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Bayfield on the 15th day of November, 2016. By Action of the BAYFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Attested to by: Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman A motion was made by Crandall/Oswald to adopt Bayfield County Amendatory Ordinance No. 2016-21, All-Terrain Vehicles and Off-Road Motor Vehicle Operation, Section 10-3-10, Designated Routes. Discussion took place on what kind of message are we sending to the public. We are closing a trail and we are looking for alternate ways to open other lands. People in the audience that are on the route want to keep it open. We can’t close a route without giving them an alternate route; to end the trail and be done is unfair to the public. It is important to have the ATV people here, they buy licenses, gas, pay taxes, etc. The Board wanted to hear from Tom Toepfer and Sheriff Susienka on the issues of highway safety. Toepfer sent a memo to the Board stating: “after seeing the amount of ATV/UTV use and recognizing our responsibility on CTH D, functionally classified as a major collector with an average daily traffic count of 600-700 automobiles daily, the Bayfield County Highway Committee has taken action to revoke the route and return to the original intent of our policy.” Toepfer wants a decision whether we want ATV and UTV on our roads. If we allow one and not the other - give him some direction. This is only limited to County D right now. It has been a monthly ordeal to have requests to open up other roads. If all of the 308 roads were opened up his job would be easier. The problem is some are opened and others are not. It would be easier to open them all up. This is a Bboard decision. ATV’s don’t cause damage to the roads that are extensive. In the agreement it would be the township that would take care of it. Discussion took place on what the basis was for opening it up in 2015? It was explained to access businesses, etc. Once the town roads were opened up they became active routes. This Co Hwy D route is the largest stretch. The Highway Committee has struggled with this over the last few days. At one time we opened more, and recently decided that ATV at high speeds on County Highways with highway vehicles isn’t a good idea and listed the reasons. Further discussion was held on whether we want all county roads to allow access to ATVs. The Highway Committee looked at this and saw that Co Hwy D there is too much traffic and it is windy. The Committee needed further direction from the Board. A very lengthy discussion took place that many Board members were not aware that the town roads are not open; in the Northern part of Bayfield County the roads are open. Supervisor Miller asked if the floor could be opened up to the audience for a time period of 10 minutes for further comments. A motion was made by Miller/Rondeau to suspend the rules to allow for public comment for approximately 10 minutes. The motion carried with one opposition. Chairman Pocernich asked if anyone from the audience would like to speak. Jim from Run-A-Muck Rides, stated there is no way to get around because township roads don’t connect to Bayfield County forest land. He stated that he had approximately 5,700 renters last year in Sawyer County. He stated that accidents do happen but there are more traffic accidents. This would jeopardize his business. Mark Demonkowski, Cable. One important part is the safety factor. It has been open for 11 months and there have not been any accidents. He believes that if it was a problem or a safety issue there would have been accidents – that should speak for itself. Tony Litwiwchuk, heard the numbers of ATVs coming down Co Hwy D. We share the same privileges for less noise. I know the ATVS are there, if we could find a different route, but he doesn’t need them to come up and down. It is loud and believes it is a disaster waiting to happen. You have bikers, rollerbladers, etc. Snowmobilers have worked together in getting snowmobile trails together, why can’t ATVers work with land owners as well? Steve Bollig stated everyone pays taxes. This isn’t relevant to this issue. The Fun in the Forest, annual ATV ride put on by WACO, Toys for Tots type ride. When he went forward with this petition a year ago, it is the only way you get a road open. He went to Town of Namakagon, you need 2/3rds vote. There are problems, there is always going to be noise. Some people like it really quiet, some like power sports, we all have to get along and find ways of working together. There are about 3-4 weekends when a club may come 309 to the area and stay. To his knowledge there have been no tickets written, no violation of other properties. He asked the Board if they have heard of any complaints. A motion was made by Miller/Bussey for a 5-minute extension for public comment. The motion carried with one opposition. Philip Rasmussen spoke regarding working with different communities to connect the roads for different types of recreations. This is part of their town’s planning. The Town Board was supportive of this when it was first submitted. They are trying to connect places; town roads don’t reach everywhere and county roads are needed. It isn’t that the town doesn’t want to use town roads, it is that we need the county roads as well. Ron Pillar commented that the group of individuals is here to have it remain in place while 1 person wants it removed. Chairman Pocernich closed public comment. Further discussion took place on the different entities that use either town or county roads from bicyclists, walkers, snowmobiles, ATVs, etc. It was also discussed that perhaps we should open up all county roads rather than the same issue coming up every few months. If we are going to have some open and other not, open them all up and make everyone happy. While this seemed to the favor of some Board members others were not in favor of this. Discussion then turned to the citations and violations on this particular stretch and Sheriff Susienka shared his comments with the Board. He isn’t opposed or for, his job is to just keep the peace. There have been no accidents. Drinking and driving laws for ATVs was also discussed. The Sheriff was thanked for his input. Supervisor Miller asked for a roll call vote on this motion, as follows: Miller- no; Crandall-yes; Rondeau-no; Goodwin-no; Bussey-no; Fickbohm-yes; Maki-no; Oswald-yes; Silbert-no; Strand-yes; Williams-absent; Coughtry-no. Total: 13, 5 yes, 7 no. The motion failed. Pocernich stated that this could have been revoked by the Highway Committee at any time, however this is a County Ordinance and the Highway Committee felt it should be brought to the full Board. 12. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Bayfield County Business Park Plan. Scottie Sandstrom was present to update the Board on the Business Park Plan. He stated that approximately one year ago, a plan was shared with the Board regarding property off of US Hwy 2, whereby the Board agreed to hire the consulting firm of Cedar Corporation to develop a Business Park Plan. Since then we have formed a 5-member committee which consists of: 2 business representatives: Xcel and Norvado; Brett Rondeau, Chair of the Bayfield County Executive Committee; Mark Abeles-Allison, County Administrator; and himself. The Committee has been working on the plan since the first of the year. Encouraging other townships to do so as well, and recently the town of Barnes is also using 310 Cedar Corp. to market their business park. Sandstrom gave a powerpoint presentation going over the plans for the business park. A motion was made by Bussey/Crandall to approve the Bayfield County Business Park Plan. Discussion regarding the endless use of water on the property. It was stated that the well has dug but not used yet. Sandstrom stated that he recently spoke to someone that would like to purchase property. There is a well that could be put into operation, and shared with others. Discussion on whether this should be included so that there isn’t a “free for all” of water, rather it is shared. We still have the right to limit use. Grant funding is required when seeking development. Waste-water discharge/storm water use is in the plan for this. There was no further discussion and the motion carried. 13. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-63, Designation of Authorized Depositories for Bayfield County. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows: WHEREAS, it may be necessary to borrow funds on a short term basis in order to meet payrolls and other obligations including current and ordinary expenses within the next year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors of Bayfield County in annual session, assembled this 15th day of November, 2016, directs and authorizes the County Board Chairman of the County of Bayfield, the County Clerk, and the County Treasurer, to borrow funds on a short term basis for 2017, in an amount not to exceed Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) in aggregate if in their opinion it should be to the County’s best interest to make such loan or loans. By Action of the BAYFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman A motion was made by Rondeau/Miller to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-63, Designation of Authorized Depositories for Bayfield County. The motion carried. 14. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-64, Authorization for County Board Chairman, County Clerk, and the County Treasurer of the County of Bayfield to make Short Term Loans. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows: WHEREAS, Section 34.05 of the Wisconsin Statutes authorizes counties to invest any of their funds not immediately needed, in time deposits, in banks, or savings and loan associations, in accordance with and subject to the limitations of Wisconsin Statute §66.0603(1m), and also authorizes counties to engage in financial transactions in which the public depository agrees to repay funds advanced to it by the county plus interest, if the agreement is secured by bonds or securities issued or guaranteed as to principal and interest by the Federal Government; and 311 WHEREAS, it appears to be to the financial benefit of the County and its citizens to invest funds not immediately needed in such deposits and to enter into such financial transactions from time to time; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors, assembled this 15th day of November, 2016, hereby authorizes and directs the Bayfield County Treasurer to invest 2017 county funds, not immediately needed, either in time deposits in accordance with and subject to the limitations of Wisconsin Statute §66.0603, or by entering into financial transactions in which a public depository agrees to repay funds advanced to it by the County plus interest, if the agreement is fully secured by securities issued or guaranteed as to principal and interest by the Federal Government, with any of the following financial institutions, which have been designated as public depositories for Bayfield County: Bremer Bank & Bremer Trust; Security State Bank; Northern State Bank; Chippewa Valley Bank; and the Local Government Investment Pool, investing in public instruments as approved by the County Executive Committee in accordance with county and state investment policies and laws; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that County funds not so invested shall be deposited in checking or savings accounts at any of the foregoing institutions. By Action of the BAYFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman A motion was made by Miller/Rondeau to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-64, Authorization for County Board Chairman, County Clerk, and the County Treasurer of the County of Bayfield to make Short Term Loans. The motion carried. 15. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-65, Holding of Meetings as may be Necessary to Conduct Business in 2017. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows: WHEREAS, Wisconsin Statute §59.13(2)(a) requires counties containing less than 25,000 population, to 20 days, not more than 10 of which shall be for services on any one committee, except that the Board may increase the number of committee meetings under par. (b) and similarly fix the compensation of the members for the additional meetings; and WHEREAS, the committees of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors are required to conduct business of said Bayfield County, to hold and conduct committee meetings in excess of the number permitted by State Statute §59.13(2)(a); and WHEREAS, by action of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors, the number of meetings of said committees beyond the statutory limit may be extended. 312 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors assembled this 15th day of November, 2016, agree that the committees of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors be and are hereby authorized to hold such meetings during the year 2017, as may be necessary to conduct the business of said Bayfield County. By Action of the BAYFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman A motion was made by Crandall/Rondeau to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-65, Holding of Meetings as may be Necessary to Conduct Business in 2017. The motion carried. 16. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-66, Regarding Year End Budget Amendment for Copy Machine Fund 730. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows: WHEREAS, County Policy requires that changes or transfer of funds from one line item to another must be approved by the County Executive Committee and changes to the bottom line of a budget must be approved by the County Board; and WHEREAS, several additional copiers were moved to the internal service copier fund rather than being stand-alone copiers paid directly by the department; and WHEREAS, $28,500 is anticipated to be expended in 2016, exceeding the budgeted amount by $13,000; and WHEREAS, interdepartmental copy costs collected in 2016 will offset the additional expenses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors assembled this 15th day of November, 2016 approves the following 2016 budget amendments: Increase Expense Budget line 730-73-51455-50240 by $10,200 Repair & Maintenance Increase Expense Budget line 730-73-51455-50540 by $2,800 Depreciation & Amortization Increase Revenue Budget line 730-73-47412 by $13,000 Interdepartmental Copy Charge. By Action of the BAYFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman A motion was made by Bussey/Silbert to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-66, Regarding Year End Budget Amendment for Copy Machine Fund 730. A roll 313 call vote was taken as follows: Crandall-yes; Rondeau-yes; Goodwin-yes; Bussey-yes; Fickbohm-yes; Maki-yes; Oswald-yes; Silbert-yes; Pocernich-yes; Strand-yes; Williams-absent; Coughtry-yes; Miller-yes. Total: 13, 12 yes, 0 no, 1 absent, the motion carried. 17. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-69, Request to Amend UW- Extension 292 Fund Budget. Tim Kane, UW-Extension Educator; was present to explain that the budget amendment is for 3 grants; 2 new ones and 1 old one. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows: WHEREAS, the Bayfield County UW-Extension Office has received a grant from the Specialty Crop Block Grant program through the State of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection so that Bayfield County UW-Extension can work with area school districts and commercial vegetable growers to develop a deep winter salad greens production system using high tunnel greenhouses with results disseminated statewide; and WHEREAS, the Bayfield County UW-Extension Office is continuing its partnership with the University of Wisconsin and the University of Minnesota and their contract with the USDA SARE program, to continue with the investment made toward the development of a commercial hazelnut industry. Specifically, this project will capitalize on previous germplasm development work by deploying the first generation of select genotypes identified through the Hazelnut Improvement Program. Four of these select genotypes will be propagated and established on fifteen on-farm plantings across the Upper Midwest. These plantings will allow us to quantify yields and performance in advance of possible commercial release of the material. In addition, the plantings will allow growers to develop the agronomic experience and skills specific to the genotypes; and WHEREAS, the Bayfield County UW-Extension Office has expended funds above the amount budgeted for 2016 for the USDA/WIDATCP Specialty Crop Grant: Hazelnut Micro-Propagation and will receive funds above the amount budgeted for 2016 from the USDA/WIDATCP Specialty Crop Grant: Hazelnut Micro-Propagation; and WHEREAS, the 2016 Bayfield County UW-Extension 292 budget needs to be amended to reflect these increases and expenses: Revenue Accounts to increase for a total of $50,150.28 # 292-25-43570-010 Deep Winter Salad Greens in the amount of $23,340.23 # 292-25-43570-011 Scaling-Up Hazelnuts in the amount of $6,565 # 292-25-43570-003 Specialty Block Grant-Micro-Propagation in the amount of $20,245.05 Disbursement Accounts to increase for a total of $50,150.28 Deep Winter Salad Greens # 292-25-55646-50290 Contractual Services in the amount of $2,781.60 # 292-25-55646-50332 Mileage in the amount of $332.63 # 292-25-55646-50340 Operating Supplies in the amount of $20,226 314 Scaling Up Hazelnuts # 292-25-55647-50290 Contractual Services in the amount of $5,800 # 292-25-55647-50332 Mileage in the amount of $765 Specialty Crop Grant: Hazelnut Propagation # 292-25-55642-50290 - Contractual Services in the amount of $11,735.01 # 292-25-55642-50340 - Operating Supplies in the amount of $8,510.04 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors assembled this 15th day of November, 2016 does hereby amend the UW- Extension 292 budget to reflect the increase in revenues by $50,150.28 and the increase in expenditures by $50,150.28. By Action of the BAYFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman A motion was made by Goodwin/Rondeau to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No. 2016-69, Request to Amend UW-Extension 292 Fund Budget. Discussion took place on the hazelnut research and it was stated that this project is a State Cooperation project with 7 other states, and Kane explained. Kane also stated that if the Board would want a more detailed explanation of the hazelnut project, he would be happy to go over this at a later time. New crops that have also been added are soy beans, cranberries, and sunflowers. Nutella is a product from this as well as fresh salad oils from soy beans. The hazelnut crop is a driven by big business stating that Ontario and Mexico City grow these nuts. In Minnesota, General Mills wants to put them in their cereal products, trail mixes, and so on. The hazelnut is catching on everywhere. There are 150 different varieties of hazelnuts and we have narrowed it down to the top 5 plants, which are the larger size. These plants are a perennial and once established are pretty well set, a long term crop. A roll call vote took place as follows: Rondeau-yes; Goodwin-yes; Bussey-yes; Fickbohm-yes; Maki-yes; Oswald-yes; Silbert-yes; Pocernich-yes; Strand-yes; Williams-absent; Coughtry-yes; Miller-no; Crandall-yes. Total: 13, 11 yes, 1 no, 1 absent, the motion carried. 18. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Contingency Fund Appropriation of $16,000 for a County-wide Water Well Database as part of Hydrologic Atlas. Abeles-Allison commented on this subject as it is a continuation of what we started through the Large Scale Committee. If Bayfield County receives a Coastal Management Grant and Land Records receives their grant, this would put us in a position that we could manage the soil, water, depth of bedrock in an informative and detailed basis. A motion was made by Strand/Silbert to approve the $16,000 from the Contingency Fund for county-wide water well database as part of the hydrologic atlas. Discussion took place, the motion carried. 315 A motion was made by Strand/Silbert to approve $16,000 from the Contingency Fund for a county-wide water well database as part of the hydrologic atlas. Discussion took place that we are hoping to receive the coastal management and DNR grant and we would be able to complete the project. If we don’t receive them, we are not liable for the rest. It was stated that this was brought up about a month ago and we decided were not going to approve this until all of the grants were in place. Now we have this in front of us again to vote on again. It was stated that this vital and continuation of the Livestock Committee. This is a tool for protecting our water and we would be foolish not to take a part of this. This is not a grant requirement that we act on this before we get the other grants. We need to keep moving forward. The Livestock Committee recommends that we adopt this unanimously. A roll call vote was taken as follows: Goodwin-no; Bussey-yes; Fickbohm-yes; Maki-no; Oswald-yes; Silbert-yes; Pocernich-yes; Strand-yes; Williams-absent; Coughtry-yes; Miller-no; Crandall-yes; Rondeau-no. Total: 13, 8 yes, 4 no, 1 absent, the motion carried. 19. A motion was made by Rondeau/Miller to move into Executive Session allowing for Ben Dufford, Jason Fischbach, and Attorney Coleman to also remain. The motion carried. A motion was made by Rondeau/Strand to move out of Executive Session. The motion carried. 20. Administrator’s Report: a) Upcoming Meeting Dates:  December 13th if necessary;  January 31st – 5 p.m.  February 28th b) Information on Portage County in packet; c) Committee meeting times have changed a bit – thank you for this; d) Reminder of the County Holiday Lunch on Dec. 14th from 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. – Don’t forget to RSVP. e) Get your per diems and mileage in by Dec. 16th if possible or as soon thereafter. There being no further business to come before the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors, Chairman Pocernich adjourned the meeting at 9:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott S. Fibert SSF/dmb