HomeMy WebLinkAboutCounty Board of Supervisors - Minutes - 1/31/20173
Minutes of the
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors’ Meeting
January 31, 2017 – 5:00 p.m.
Bayfield County Board Room, Courthouse, Washburn, Wisconsin
There was presentation and training held from 5:00 pm to 6:00 pm for interested
County Board members. The training was put on by Bayfield County’s liability insurance,
Wisconsin County Mutual, being represented by, Bryan Chance. The topics discussed were
sexual harassment and bullying. Discussion took place during and more after the
presentation. The board thanked Bryan for giving this presentation.
The Bayfield County Board of Supervisors’ meeting was called to order by Chairman
Pocernich 6:00 pm. A roll call was taken by Scott Fibert, County Clerk, as follows: Maki-
present; Oswald-present; Silbert-present; Pocernich-present; Strand-present; Williams-
present; Coughtry-present; Miller-present; Crandall-present; Rondeau-present; Goodwin-
via-telephone; Bussey-present; Fickbohm-present. Total 13: 13 present, 0 absent. A
quorum was present to conduct business. The following were also present for this
evening’s meeting: Mark Abeles-Allison, County Administrator; Dawn M. Bellile, Deputy
County Clerk; Thomas Toepfer, Highway Commissioner; Robert Schierman, Zoning
Administrator; Kim Lawton, District Attorney; Kay Cederberg, Clerk of Court; Brenda
Spurlock, Criminal Justice Coordinator; Scottie Sandstrom, Bayfield County Economic
Development Rep.; Attorney Linda Coleman.
1. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all in attendance.
2. A Moment of Silence was held in memory of Jay Cablk and Shirley Moran.
3. Motion Regarding Minutes of November 15, 2016 and January 12, 2017
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors’ Meetings. The Board dispensed with the reading
of the minutes. To see a copy either set of minutes, please visit the County’s webpage at
www.bayfieldcounty.org/meetings or contact the County Clerk’s office. A motion was
made by Rondeau/Silbert to adopt the November 15, 2016 Minutes of the Bayfield
County Board of Supervisors’ Meeting. The motion carried. A motion was made by
Rondeau/Crandall to adopt the January 12, 2016 Minutes of the Bayfield County
Board of Supervisors’ Meeting. It was noted that a correction in Resolution 2017-01 was
made in a line item amount to reflect the proper account number the funds should go to.
The motion carried.
4. Public Comment.
Bucky Jardine, Port Wing, spoke on the concern of forest land that is being lost from the
tax roll. He spoke on conservancies and how they can hurt the County as far as the tax
base goes. Jardine felt that the Board and Forestry Committee should look at this in
further detail. Jardine also spoke about the dollars the pig farm topic has cost the
County. Jardine stated that items such as these that cost the taxpayers money should be
in the paper for all to read and see.
4
5. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2017-02, Honoring Patricia Olson upon
her Retirement from the Bayfield County Register of Deed’s Office. Abeles-Allison
read the Resolution, which reads as follows:
WHEREAS, Patricia Olson, has served Bayfield County with distinction, honor and
dedication for twenty-six (26) years, most recently serving the citizens of Bayfield County
as Register of Deeds for the last fourteen (14) years.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of
Supervisors assembled this 31st day of January, 2017, honors Patricia Olson, for her 26
years of public service to Bayfield County and expresses gratitude for her efforts,
wishing her well in the years ahead.
By Action of the
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman
A motion was made by Bussey/Crandall to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No.
2017-02, Honoring Patricia Olson upon her Retirement from the Bayfield County
Register of Deed’s Office. The motion carried.
6. Introduction of and Presentation by Kim Lawton, Newly Elected District
Attorney. Abeles-Allison stated that Kim began her term of office on January 3rd and
Bayfield County is excited to have her on board. He then turned the meeting over to
Lawton. Lawton stated that she is excited to be here and she has made it through her 5th
day of criminal intake. Lawton explained many of the roles her office plays in conjunction
with other departments. Lawton also informed the Board that very soon, all
documentation will be going through a system of “E-filing” and she is very excited about
that as it will eliminate papers everywhere, increase efficiency and everyone will be on the
same page by just looking documents up in the system. Lawton stated that so far, it has
been a great experience and both Kay Cederberg and Brenda Spurlock have been helping
her to ease into the job. Lawton spoke on the goings on in her department and how she
believes that through the E-filing process, many cases will not have to wait so long. The
Board asked questions of Lawton and Lawton invited the Board to stop by anytime to see
how the progress is going.
7. State of the County Address. Abeles-Allison stated that per State
Statute, it is required of a County Administrator to prepare and share with the Board a
State of the County Address. Abeles-Allison shared a video presentation of what has
happened within the County over the past year. A motion was made by Rondeau/Maki to
receive and place on file the State of the County Address. The motion carried.
8. Year End Bayfield County Economic Development Presentation. Scottie
Sandstrom, Bayfield County Economic Development Representative, gave a powerpoint
presentation and discussed with the Boards different challenges that Bayfield County is
5
facing and how those needs are trying to be met. Discussion took place. The Board
thanked Sandstrom for his report and presentation.
9. Presentation, Discussion and Approval of 2017 Forestry and Parks
Department Work Plan. Jason Bodine, Forest Administrator, was present to give a brief
synopsis of the Work Plan. The Forestry Department has acquired the parks and the Plan
has many changes to it. This is an attempt to provide more history and in depth detail as
to what the Department does and the decisions they make on a daily basis. There is a
little bit of everything contained in the Plan. Bodine further stated that the County now
has 2 yurts which are being used steadily. He also reported that Bayfield County is the 4th
largest county in the State. Stumpage returns for 2015 were great and in 2016, we hit a
banner year. Bodine did report, however, that he believes Bayfield County has now hit its
plateau. The Board dispensed with the reading of the report since Bodine was present to
give a synopsis of the Plan, which reads as follows:
BAYFIELD COUNTY FORESTRY & PARKS DEPARTMENT
ANNUAL WORK PLAN
January 1 through December 31, 2017
The Bayfield County Forestry and Parks Department Work Plan for the 2017 calendar year
gives direction and meaning to the Forestry and Parks budget, further defines and
supplements the Comprehensive Fifteen Year Land Use Plan, and emphasizes current goals
and needs of the County Forest, Parks and Trails Programs. This plan also complies with
Chapter NR47 Wisconsin Administrative Rules for the administration of the County Forest
Administrator Grant Program.
SUSTAINABLE TIMBER HARVEST
One of the primary missions of the Bayfield County Forestry and Parks Department
(hereafter “Department”) is to manage, conserve, and protect the natural resources of the
county forest. Multiple use and sustainable forest management practices will be utilized
to provide a wide variety of forest products and amenities for current and future
generations. Sustainable forest management is commonly defined as meeting the forest
resource needs and values of the present without compromising the similar necessities of
future generations.
Wisconsin’s county forests are governed under County Forest Law (s. 28.11) and were
created to become working forests, with an emphasis on optimizing the production of
forest products and maximizing public benefits. Below is the purpose statement as found
in s. 28.11(1):
The purpose of this section is to provide the basis for a permanent program of county
forests and to enable and encourage the planned development and management of the
6
county forests for optimum production of forest products, together with recreational
opportunities, wildlife, watershed protection and stabilization of stream flow, giving full
recognition to the concept of multiple-use to assure maximum public benefits; to protect
the public rights, interests and investments in such lands; and to compensate the counties
for the public uses, benefits and privileges these lands provide; all in a manner which will
provide a reasonable revenue to the towns in which such lands lie.
Partnership with the DNR
In accordance with s. 28.11, the DNR oversees the county forest program. As per that
partnership, the DNR provides an abundance of professional, technical and financial
assistance to counties having lands entered in the county forest program. On the Bayfield
Count Forest, the annual time commitment (time standards) allocated by the DNR to the
county has been calculated at 3,395 hours and primarily includes, but is not limited to:
1. Establishment of timber sales. Roughly 20% to 25% of the annual sustainable
harvest goal is accomplished by DNR foresters.
2. Forest reconnaissance (both compartment and stand updates).
3. Forest stand data entry (WisFIRS, see below) and maintenance.
4. Regeneration monitoring, both artificial and natural.
5. Timber stand improvements (TSI).
6. Timber sale administration.
7. Mechanical site preparation for natural regeneration.
8. Mechanical site preparation for artificial regeneration.
9. County forest road and trail construction and maintenance.
10. Road right of way and wildlife (game) opening mowing/maintenance.
11. Support from professional forest management specialists, including forest
hydrologists, wildlife biologists, forest ecologists, forest health specialists, GIS
specialists, etc.
12. Support, manage and administer the county forest group certifications, for both
SFI and FSC (both forest certificates are administered by the DNR through a
group format).
13. Assistance in the development and maintenance of the comprehensive land use and
annual work plans.
14. Function as a catalyst for the transfer of technology and professional or scientific
information, as well as providing opportunities for training or enhancement.
15. Financial support through various grants, aids and loans.
Forest Certification
The Bayfield County Forest is dual, third party certified (as part of the Wisconsin County
Forest Program group certificates, as managed by the DNR). For the past ten plus years,
the Department has maintained forest certificates with both SFI (Sustainable Forestry
Initiative) and FSC (Forest Stewardship Council). The DNR maintains all aspects
(administratively and financially) of both the SFI and FSC group certificates.
7
The standards, principles and/or strategic direction of each non-profit, independent
forest certifying body are developed by their respective board members and staff, which
include representation from conservation organizations, academia, tribal entities, family
forest owners, private forest landowners, public forest landowners and the forest
products industry. Each certifying organization is further structured into three sectors
(SFI) or chambers (FSC), reflecting environmental, social and economic components. This
diversity reflects the wide variety of interests in the forest management community.
As part of certification, the county forest management program is audited annually against
the strict standards, guidelines and principles of each independent organization. To date,
every year, Bayfield County has either met or exceeded each standard.
Maintaining forest certification isn’t a mandate. The Department invites each certifying
entity to analyze and scrutinize our management of the forest. We ask them to subject
our forest management practices, plans and principles to their strict, rigid and dynamic
internal standards, principles and guidelines. In a nutshell, their findings confirm what we
already know: that the county forest is extremely well managed by professionals who are
passionate about what they do. Maintaining one certificate, let alone two, is a significant
commitment and demonstrates the county’s desire to ensure the public that we have some
of the best managed forests in the country.
In 2017, the Department will continue working with each independent certifying body, as
well as the DNR, to ensure that the county forest is sustainably managed, not only to the
standards and expectations of those auditing and overseeing the program, but also to the
professional principles and values exhibited and demanded by all staff members within the
Department.
Sustainable Harvest Goals
The Bayfield County Forest totals 171,993 acres, making it the fourth largest county
forest in the state. Timber harvests are important for the economic well-being of
Bayfield County, as well as for the health and vigor of the forest. One of the major
objectives of timber management is to produce a perpetual sustained yield of forest
products. In part, this is realized through the analysis and scheduling of forest stands for
management and, ultimately, the development of sustainable annual and long term harvest
goals. Implementation of sound, professionally recognized forest management and
harvesting techniques is an essential part of the process.
Numerous criteria are analyzed when developing short and long term sustainable
management goals. Existing reconnaissance data (as entered and compiled in WisFIRS,
short for Wisconsin Forest Inventory and Reporting System, a data management
application developed and maintained by the WDNR), along with thorough field inspections
8
conducted by professional Bayfield County Forestry and Parks Department staff and DNR
foresters, will be used to determine which stands are ready for treatment.
Short or long term adjustments to the management approaches or philosophies of specific
forest types may also be incorporated in the goal development process. Such
modifications may be needed as a means to address numerous challenges that eventually
(or inevitably) arise over the course of managing a vast and diverse forested resource.
Some of which include: addressing unbalanced age class distributions; the management
direction of timber types where a large percentage of the acreage base is either at or
approaching maturity; unpredicted or unexpected responses to previous silvicultural
treatments; response to insect or disease outbreaks or other natural disasters i.e. wind
storms; challenges regarding natural or artificial regeneration i.e. deer browse, invasive
species control, etc; responses to research or other professional recommendations
regarding the management approaches of specific forest types or communities.
In addition, the long term monitoring of stands that have previously received treatment is
crucial in determining the success of past management practices. The results of previous
management will also aid in the development and implementation of future prescriptions.
The estimated 2017 sustainable harvest goal for the Bayfield County Forest is
5,030 acres. This represents a decrease of 30 acres (roughly 0.6%) when
compared to the harvest goal for 2016.
As previously stated, numerous factors have the potential to influence the harvest goal
for any given year. Below is a brief summary regarding the 2017 management
approaches/issues/direction for the major timber types on the forest:
Jack Pine:
At nearly 12,500 acres, jack pine is the fifth largest timber type on the county forest.
It’s also a very young type, with over 55% of the acreage base established within the past
20 years and another 25% between 21 and 30 years ago (nearly 80% of the acreage base is
less than 30 years old).
Jack pine exists in basically two areas on the forest, all within the Northwest Sands
Ecological landscape. Roughly 2,500 acres exist on sandy soils in the northern parts of the
county (mostly east of Valhalla – on the northeastern most fringe of the NW Sands) and
10,000 acres in the barrens areas located near Iron River and north of Barnes.
Most of the stands located in the pine barrens north of Barnes are part of the Barnes
Barrens Management Area (currently at roughly 7,000 acres). This special management
area was designated in 2012 with the goal of developing and maintaining critically
important Pine Barrens habitat through the simultaneous management of jack pine and
open/early successional barrens. Among other things, the Barrens Management plan
9
defines operational parameters and guidelines that must be followed to achieve the
desired future condition.
A few important objectives of the Barnes Barrens Management Plan are as follows:
Delineate approximately 11,500 acres as a special management area on the Bayfield
County Forest for the simultaneous management of timber products and the
development and maintenance of early successional Open and Brush Prairie Pine
Barrens habitat.
Identify and delineate a “core” area and four management zones within the special
management area.
Each zone surrounds a roughly 1,000 acre, permanently open core area and ranges in
size from roughly 2,500 to over 2,900 acres. The management zones are assigned a
12 year harvest interval (each zone is completely harvested over a period of 12
years). During the harvest interval, whenever possible, all stands within each zone
will be harvested and seeded or planted exclusively to jack pine. From the time of
harvest until the point when the jack pine regeneration is approximately 10 feet in
height, stand characteristics will meet the criteria for Brush Prairie Barrens.
Typically, suitable Brush Prairie habitat will exist for 10 to 15 years after harvest.
The habitat created during this 10 to 15-year window will serve as temporary or
“surrogate barrens”. Combined with the permanently open core, when fully
established, between 3,500 to nearly 4,000 acres of prime barrens habitat will
exist within this special management area.
Develop a timetable for the systematic harvest and regeneration of timber in each
designated management zone. When fully regulated, jack pine stands will be
managed on roughly a 48-year rotation (as stated above, it will take about 12 years
to manage each zone).
Designate approximately 200 contiguous acres within each zone as Kirtland’s
Warbler Habitat Areas (KWHA). Reforest these areas to jack pine at densities
that are conducive to creating suitable Kirtland’s Warbler habitat. Currently,
suitable habitat contains at least 1,200 stems per acre, combined with 1 to 5
unforested openings per acre. Openings should total approximately 25% of the
stand and be evenly distributed (the first confirmed nesting and successful
fledging of Kirtland’s Warblers in Bayfield County occurred in the Barnes Barrens
Management Area in 2016. All five nestlings successfully fledged).
Some aspen, red pine and scrub oak will also exist within the Barrens, but the goal
will be to regenerate jack pine whenever possible.
Development of the Barrens will take some time, as the Department is still
managing the results of previous management (with a diversity of species and age
classes). However, the core area is on target to be fully established by at least
2035 (and probably much sooner). Once all stands are cleaned up and ready, the
10
Department will begin the harvest of Zone 1, thus marking the beginning of the
floating barrens.
In the meantime, the Department will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the
plan. As with any plan, amendments, alterations or modifications are expected. The
Department will also continue to work with the DNR regarding the technical aspects
of barrens development and maintenance.
In the jack pine type, for the past decade, the Department has made an attempt to carry
mature stands on the landscape for as long as possible. This was done primarily to provide
a relative even flow of annual harvest, as well as to maintain a level of mature jack pine on
the forest (i.e. structural diversity).
However, currently, many stands are experiencing significant mortality, at levels equal to
or exceeding 30%. The Department can no longer carry these mature stands without
experiencing even greater losses of volume. A higher percentage of dead and dying trees
also increases the risk of insect and/or disease outbreaks (as well as heavier fuel loads),
which would potentially have a negative impact on other stands in the area. As a result,
the short term objective is to manage all stands experiencing 30% or greater mortality
within the next two years (a process that started in 2016).
In 2016, the focus was managing the targeted stands within the Barnes Barrens
Management Area. In 2017, the focus will be on stands located outside the Barrens. Once
the stands with the greatest amount of mortality have been managed, the Department will
evaluate the remaining and plan accordingly. If the Department determines that other
stands are rapidly deteriorating or otherwise need to be managed immediately, the goal
for 2017 may be adjusted accordingly.
Once the management of the over mature stands is completed (by the end of 2017), it is
anticipated that the vast majority of remaining mature jack pine will be managed within
the next five to ten years (again, with an emphasis on carrying mature stands for as long
as possible). Afterwards, it is anticipated that there will be a narrow window where
significantly less jack pine will be managed, at least until the next larger age classes begin
to reach maturity (generally between 50 to 60 years of age).
The 2017 goal for jack pine will be broken into two parts: 281 acres located outside
of the Barnes Barrens Management Area and 64 acres located inside the Barrens,
for a total of 345 acres. This represents a slight decrease of 20 acres when
compared to the total goal for 2016 (365 acres). The Department will also continue
to manage stands located within the Barnes Barrens Management Area as outlined
in the plan. Modifications to the plan may be necessary, depending on a stands
response to treatment or the development of better direction, and will be
addressed on a case by case basis.
11
Red Pine:
Red pine is the third largest timber type on the county forest, comprising a total of nearly
18,000 acres. Most of the acreage base is composed of plantations, but about 1,000 acres
of natural stands exist. Natural stands tend to be much smaller in size (acreage) and
widely scattered throughout the forest.
The general model for red pine management is fairly simple. Most of the management
centers around stands of artificial origin (plantations). In plantations, once stands reach
the stage in which they can be managed (typically around 30 years old), a timber sale is
established. That harvest cycle is then repeated about every 10 years. Once a stand has
been thinned about three times, harvest intervals tend to slow a bit, primarily contingent
upon the growth response from previous treatments. At this point, harvest intervals can
still be on a 10-year cycle, but more typically end up closer to every 12 to 15 years.
Depending on a variety of factors, including responses to previous treatments, presence of
insects or disease, general management direction for the timber type, forest product
development and markets, etc., the stand can be rotated anywhere between 70 and 120
years of age (a little earlier or later depending on the above mentioned factors).
Rotation typically involves prescribing a clear-cut, in which all trees are removed
(especially critical if re-establishing a red pine plantation, as older trees can be vectors
for future insect or disease infestations). Natural stands are managed as well, with a
focus on stands of higher density or those that have enough acreage for harvest.
However, roughly 95% of the harvest goal is derived from the management of plantations.
The 2017 goal for red pine is 915 acres (roughly 855 acres prescribed for thinning
and 60 as regeneration). This represents a decrease of 20 acres (or about 2%)
when compared to the goal for 2016 (935 acres).
Northern Hardwood:
In the northern hardwood type, prescriptions for existing stands have repeatedly
conflicted with field observations. Previously, the standard prescription given to nearly all
northern hardwood stands was un-even aged management (or a thinning), regardless of
stand or site quality. Consequently, many stands over the past 20 years have been
managed with un-even aged prescriptions (i.e. relatively light selective harvests which
incorporate small gaps to facilitate new regeneration). Northern hardwood stands
developing on drier (or wetter) sites of medium to medium-poor quality have generally not
responded well to the traditional methods of management (or traditional thinking).
Through routine and regular regeneration monitoring, the Department is discovering that
regeneration gaps (associated with traditional un-even aged management practices) are
oftentimes dominated by ironwood, while the preferred species that do regenerate (i.e.
12
maple, basswood, yellow birch, oak) are low in number, slow to develop/grow and/or
repeatedly browsed by deer (which allows them to get quickly overtopped by undesirable
species). Growth and development on the remaining stems is also largely poor and slow,
with stands, in general, just not responding to the traditional practices. Additionally, it
was discovered that previous treatments oftentimes didn’t incorporate enough
regeneration gaps (something the Department has remedied through the establishment of
a systematic approach to gap design and placement).
The county forest contains nearly 20,000 acres of northern hardwoods (including stands
typed as red maple), making this the second largest cover type on the forest (aspen being
the largest). For the reasons previously stated, the Department is in the process of re-
evaluating the management approach on all stands of northern hardwood, especially those
developing on medium to medium poor quality sites. The Department is finding that more
intensive or less traditional methods on these poorer quality sites, that utilize larger
canopy gaps (or groups) or even aged practices, yield more favorable results.
One goal for 2017 is to continue updating all recon information in the northern hardwood
type, with a focus on stand and site quality (both existing and potential) when developing
future prescriptions. Results from previous management and subsequent regeneration
monitoring will also aid in the development of future prescriptions. In the meantime, the
2017 goal for un-even aged management was decreased slightly and even-aged management
increased slightly, as a temporary response to current observations and predicted future
prescriptions.
Once all stands have been updated (again, the goal is to have that completed, or mostly
completed, by the end of 2017), it is anticipated that many of those developing on poor to
medium-poor quality sites will be managed with more intensive un-even aged or even-aged
treatments, while stands on medium quality or better sites will continue to be managed
with more traditional un-even aged prescriptions.
Whether traditional or more intensive, all regeneration gaps associated with all uneven-
aged treatments will continue to be designed and applied systematically. The systematic
approach to gap placement ensures that all gaps are of the appropriate size and evenly
distributed throughout the stand. Systematic application also helps to ensure that
prescribed stand level gap targets are met (i.e. a typical prescription may have a goal of
10% to 20%, sometimes more, of the stand in gaps). Knowing the general gap size and total
number installed makes it easy to determine stand level accomplishments. Flexibility is
also part of the design, as gaps can be moved slightly or excluded altogether, depending on
the overall goals of the prescription. Systematically installed gaps are also easy to re-
locate, which is critical when performing routine monitoring or when needing to address
issues/concerns regarding regeneration.
13
When utilizing un-even aged management methods on the poorer quality sites, whenever
practical, larger gaps (or groups) will be incorporated with lighter thinning as an attempt
to maintain structural integrity within the stand, develop a new age class (regeneration),
increase species diversity (regeneration) and improve quality on the remaining/residual
trees. Growth and development on poorer quality stands will be significantly less than
similar treatments on better sites. It is anticipated that future re-entry into these
stands may increase slightly. Traditional methods state that re-entry should be attainable
every 10 to 20 years (depending on growth and response to previous treatment). Northern
hardwood growth and development is typically much slower on sites of lesser quality. As a
result, re-entry may be every 20 to 30 years.
The 2017 goal for thinning or un-even aged management is 555 acres, which
represents a slight decrease of 30 acres when compared to the goal for 2016.
The 2017 goal for even aged management is 335 acres, which constitutes a
slight increase of 15 acres when compared to the goal for 2016. The overall
northern hardwood management goal for 2017 is 890 acres, which is nearly
identical to the goal for 2016 (895 acres).
Red Oak:
The Department also recently completed the re-inventory of all mature stands of red oak
on the forest. This was accomplished over the past few years, as an attempt to better
capture management needs and priorities. As expected, the updating process has revealed
a significant decrease in acres ready for, or otherwise in need of, a thin.
There is a little over 15,000 acres of the red oak type on the forest. Of that, nearly 90%
is older than 75 years (nearly 13,500 acres). To drill down further, nearly 65% is 90 years
of age or older (approximately 10,000 acres). In essence, the vast majority of red oak on
the forest is either at or rapidly approaching maturity.
The rotation age for red oak is generally around 100 years of age (up to 120 years on
higher quality sites and lower on poorer quality sites). At current status, the Department
is faced with the potential task of addressing (regenerating) a large acreage base of
mature red oak, basically all at the same time. That’s neither practical, nor feasible. This
is a prime example of where management goals sometimes need to be adjusted in order to
better manage a resource.
The general management direction for red oak is to maintain the type (dominance), where
practical, and spread out or distribute the regeneration phase as much as possible. It will
vary by location, but, generally speaking, and barring any natural influences i.e. insects,
disease, wind, drought, etc., the regeneration phase can be extended equally over the next
20 to 25 years. The process has already begun, as this issue was identified years ago
(hence one of the reasons to update the type).
14
As a result, the overall goal for regeneration will be around 400 acres per year. This will
provide better regulation of the red oak resource, yield a more uniform flow of forest
products, generate a more even distribution of age classes over the landscape (which will
also maintain structural diversity and produce more diverse wildlife habitat), and create a
more balanced work load, both short and long term.
As part of the update process, stands were prioritized based on age, quality, species
diversity (whether there was a significant component of over mature aspen or birch),
previous management (if any), etc. Furthermore, stands were ranked based on the
potential or likelihood of maintaining (regenerating) the red oak component. Red oak can
be one of the most challenging timber types to regenerate on a good day. Understanding
how these current stands were established (the stands we are managing today) can reveal
some of the challenges we face today.
Most of the red oak stands we are managing today originated during the period of the last
big cutover (early 1900’s). Back then, stands were basically clear-cut, with little (if any)
regard to resource damage, best management practices for water quality (or anything for
that matter) or slash control. Soil scarification was extensive, as was logging debris.
Then the fires came. The result, extensively scarified sites, exposing a large percentage
of bare mineral soil, with little to no competing vegetation, no mature over story trees, and
very little impact from animals that love to nibble on acorns or freshly regenerating
seedlings i.e. deer or hare (there wasn’t much for regulation back then and homesteaders
needed to eat too).
Red oak, being a fire tolerant species, is built for this exact scenario. It needs relatively
bare mineral soil, a good amount of sunlight, little competition from other tree species,
and minimal predation or browse pressure. While the intensive fires killed much of the
competing vegetation, it only knocked back the red oak. Carbs stored in the root system
afforded it the luxury of rapidly developing after the fire. Newly germinating acorns were
under ideal growing conditions and also quickly established. All new red oak seedlings
rapidly and aggressively attained dominance, well before other tree species were able to
re-establish. The result: a dense stand of red oak, oftentimes with only minor
components of paper birch, aspen, red maple, white pine, red pine and, on better sites,
sugar maple.
Fast forward to today. Much emphasis is placed on the suppression of wildfires with the
goal of reducing or eliminating its potentially devastating impacts. While prescribed fire is
fairly commonly used today as a management tool to facilitate the regeneration of oak, the
scale and intensity of previous (historical) stand initiating fires will never be duplicated
(and results of prescribed fires are oftentimes unreliable and difficult to predict). Deer
numbers (and other seedling or acorn predators), by design, are currently much larger than
100 years ago and have the potential to completely wipe out any red oak regeneration
15
attempt. Stands of oak are generally all the same age (either mature, between 90 to 100
years of age, or approaching maturity), meaning oak sprouting potential and acorn viability
(both critically important in the development of new oak stands) will only continue to
decrease. Current harvesting methods and management practices result in a lighter
footprint on the landscape, meaning scarification isn’t as intensive and mineral soil is less
exposed.
Methods of regeneration have also evolved over time. All are geared towards manipulating
light and competition. Silvicultural techniques such as shelterwood, seed tree and clear-
cut are all used in attempts to regenerate new stands of red oak. Some methods, like the
shelterwood, leave a few more trees, equally distributed, on the landscape, with the goal
of establishing and tending the new crop of trees before eventually removing most of the
over story (to release the advanced regeneration). Other methods, like the seed tree,
leave fewer trees, still equally distributed on the landscape, with the goal of making more
light and resources available for new seedlings. Seed tree methods also typically leave the
remaining mature trees in place (meaning we don’t come back in to remove them), thus
reducing damage to newly developing and recruiting seedlings, which would inevitably occur
during the removal of the over story. Clear-cut methods are the most intensive, often
removing most of the over story and heavily relying on the subsequent flush of
regeneration to establish the next stand. Each method has its pros and cons and all are
used on the forest when attempting to regenerate red oak, with the Department currently
experiencing greater success with more intensive harvests.
Regardless of the regeneration method, other components required to successfully
develop a new stand of red oak still need to be considered i.e. competition control, soil
scarification, herbivory control, acorn dispersal and viability, and sprouting potential, etc.
If competing vegetation is a concern, some stands are scarified with a dozer and straight
blade in an attempt to knock back undesirable tree species and expose mineral soil.
Anchor chains, salmon blades or other implements are also used as a means to scarify soil
and reduce competing vegetation. Prescribed fire can also be used to control unwanted
vegetation. Timing of acorn dispersal and quantity (and quality) of acorn production are
also critical, but much more difficult to predict and control.
When determining where to invest additional inputs in the management of red oak, all of
the above mentioned factors need to be considered, as does site quality and location.
Some stands on higher quality sites will receive intense pressure from red and sugar maple.
They also tend to occur on rugged locales, making it difficult to stage and maneuver heavy
equipment (or administer a prescribed fire). Many of these stands may be better suited
as moderate quality northern hardwoods i.e. more maple and less oak. Management
direction in this scenario may be to thin lightly, incorporate large gaps or groups and allow
the stand to naturally convert to northern hardwood, with a lesser component of oak.
16
On the other end of the spectrum, oak stands growing on lower quality sites tend to be
associated with heavier components of aspen, birch and pine. Red oak growth and
development is also typically poor. Managing these stands with a goal of increasing the
component of aspen, birch or pine may be seriously considered.
In general, maintaining as much red oak as possible is a priority for the Department.
However, a considerable amount of emphasis will be on sites of medium quality, where oak
production and quality (or potential) is good, and additional inputs from the Department, if
needed, are the most effective.
The goal in 2017 will be to regenerate approximately 400 acres of red oak.
Whenever possible (or practical), an emphasis will be placed on maintaining stands
as red oak. In addition, approximately 160 acres will be thinned and 340 acres will
receive an over story removal (harvesting most of the remaining over story trees
from a previous shelterwood prescription). Over story removals will only occur if
the Department has determined that the stand has successfully regenerated with
desirable tree species.
Aspen:
At nearly 78,000 acres, aspen is, by far, the largest single cover type on the county forest
(roughly 45% of the entire forest). Similar to the issue with red oak, a significant portion
of the aspen type occurs within a relatively narrow age class window. Nearly 55% of the
aspen type is between 25 and 45 years of age, with an additional 20% greater than 45
years old. Ultimately, to address the relatively large wave of aspen soon to reach
maturity, the Department needs to make minor adjustments to the management approach
for this type.
The management and regulation of the aspen type is pretty straight forward. Under ideal
conditions, and assuming an equal distribution of age classes, the sustainable harvest goal
for aspen is essentially calculated by dividing the total acreage by the rotation age. The
rotation for aspen varies by location and site quality, but generally is between 50 and 55
years of age (sometimes longer on the highest quality sites or shorter on poorer sites).
When considering just the raw numbers, if the average rotation age were around 52 years
(and it is), the optimal sustainable harvest goal for aspen would be approximately 1,500
acres per year.
When calculating the long and short term sustainable management goals for the aspen type
(as is done with all other forest types), all data is analyzed by location (IRMU – Integrated
Resource Management Unit). Each unit (IRMU) represents a general area of the forest.
Each area contains slightly different growing conditions and influences.
Current age class distributions, site quality, previous management (or stands excluded
from management), recommended forester prescriptions, etc., are all weighted and
17
analyzed when determining the harvest goal per unit. Current age class distributions are
charted against desired distributions to determine if additional adjustments to the
management strategies are needed. In some cases, like those we are experiencing now,
the Department needs to enter some stands a little sooner (i.e. as early as 40 years old), in
order to better distribute age classes on the landscape and avoid similar problems in the
future.
In order to spread this narrow band out and realize a more evenly distributed condition of
age classes, we need to harvest some stands sooner than normal. These adjustments will
produce similar benefits as addressed in the red oak section, including a more regulated
distribution of aspen on the landscape. When fully regulated (and when all stands
excluded from future management are removed from consideration), the sustainable
harvest goal for aspen will be about 1,400 acres per year.
The 2017 sustainable harvest goal for aspen is 1,375 acres. This represents an
increase of 35 acres when compared to the goal for 2016 and nearly 175 acres when
compared to the goal for 2014. Again, the small increases are generally due to the
Department addressing the large acreage band of relatively narrow age class
distributions looming on the not so distant horizon.
It’s worth noting that the aspen type, particularly trembling aspen, is predicted to be one
of the more negatively impacted forested communities, when modelled against a potentially
warming climate. With roughly 45% of the ownership comprised of the aspen type, that is
a concern.
At greatest potential risk would be stands currently developing on sites of poor quality
(where nutrients and/or moisture are most limited and trees are inherently stressed).
Aspen developing on dry to very dry sites or sites that are overly wet, would be the most
at risk. Another goal for 2017 will be to develop a process or direction to analyze stands
most susceptible, if climate change models are correct, and flesh out future management
strategies and goals.
Since predicted warming climate related impacts are expected to be decades away, any
modifications to management would most likely occur well into the future (when the
youngest stands approach maturity). Still, having the discussion now will allow us to be
better prepared, especially if predictions hold true.
Total Sustainable Harvest Goal:
One of the objectives in managing the forest is to strive for a regulated, even flow of
harvests, equally distributed over the landscape. However, sustainable harvest goals
typically fluctuate slightly from year to year. Most fluctuations are explained by the
irregular distribution of age classes over the entire forest and, subsequently, when they
are ready for management.
18
Among other things, fluctuations are also a result of a change in management direction for
individual timber types, responses to natural disturbances or other unforeseen natural
events, a relatively poor response in growth from previous management, modifications in
response to accomplishments from the previous year or land acquisition.
Table 1 displays the sustainable harvest goal (acres) per primary timber type for 2017
(again, during the season, the harvest goal may be adjusted for a variety of reasons, i.e.
response to unanticipated natural events or significant changes in reconnaissance data or
as otherwise stated above). The goal for 2016 is also included for comparison:
Table 1: Sustainable Harvest Goal (acres)
Timber Type 2016 2017
Aspen 1,340 1,375
Northern Hardwood 895 890
Red Oak 870 900
Paper Birch 30 30
Scrub Oak 255 215
Red Pine 935 915
Jack Pine 365 345
White Pine 90 90
Swamp Conifer 140 140
Swamp Hardwood 100 100
Fir/Spruce 40 30
Total 5,060 5,030
On the Bayfield County Forest, the primary annual differences in sustainable harvest goals
are a result of a variety of factors, some of which include: improved reconnaissance
information, a significant increase in the number of stands reaching management age
(particularly in the aspen, red oak and red pine types), the inclusion of harvest goals for
the swamp hardwood and swamp conifer timber types (types that were excluded from
consideration in the past), adjustments in the management approaches of the aspen, red
oak and northern hardwood timber types, and modifications as a result of stand level
responses to previous treatments.
In 2015, the county purchased 1,855 acres of industrial forest lands with the assistance
of the Knowles Nelson Stewardship grant. The county also included 747 acres of county
owned, non-county forest lands, as a match. In total, 2,602 acres were added to the
county forest program. These acres will naturally provide an increase in harvest levels,
particularly in the red pine type.
19
In 2016, the county purchased another 198 acres of land previously owned by the
Wisconsin DNR. Over the past two years, the county has added 2,800 acres to the county
forest. Much of this land has immediate management potential and will have a modest
impact on short and long term sustainable harvest goals.
Over the past decade, the sustainable harvest goal has changed significantly. The peak
harvest goal was in 2012, with a target of 5,238 acres. This was primarily due to the
addition of numerous older, backlogged stands. Now that most of the backlogged stands
have been managed, the annual sustainable harvest goal should hover between roughly
4,500 and 5,000 acres per year.
Since 2006, the sustainable harvest goal has increased by approximately 60%; from 3,134
acres to 5,030 acres in 2017.
Figure 1 displays the total sustainable harvest goals over the last ten years (since 2008).
Maximizing the sustainable management of the county forest was a primary goal heading
into calendar year 2011. As displayed in Figure 1, the average sustainable harvest goal
from 2011 through 2017 increased by over 1,250 acres per year, when compared to the
average goals from 2006 through 2010.
The significant increase in the sustainable harvest goal created a substantial increase in
the amount of time required to successfully accomplish the goal. In addition, numerous
other forest management responsibilities increased over the same time period creating a
significant deficit in time required to accomplish both annual and long term goals.
Figure 1
20
To address the deficit, one full time forester position was added to the staff in early
2011. The impact of the additional forester was immediate (see Figures 2 and 3 below). A
recreation forester position was created in 2013. Initially, roughly 20% of this position’s
workload was dedicated towards various forestry related activities.
However, as the recreational footprint of the Department and subsequent responsibilities
have increased significantly over the past few years, the amount of time this position has
to dedicate towards forestry activities is almost nil.
Figure 2 displays the annual sustainable harvest goal, accomplishment and sold timber sales
from 2008 through 2017 (2016 and 2017 are estimates):
Prior to 2011, the Department averaged 45 timber sales, covering 3,044 acres per year.
The average total winning bid value for those sales was approximately $2.36 million. Since
2011, the Department has averaged 57 sales, covering just over 4,500 acres. During that
time, the average total winning bid values have more than doubled, from roughly $2.36
million to nearly $4.8 million. The total winning bid values in 2015 topped $6.5 million!
Figure 3 displays the total sold value of timber sales and actual revenues from stumpage
(harvested timber) from 2008 through 2017 (2017 is a conservative estimate):
Figure 2
21
Bayfield County generated just over $5.0 million in total stumpage revenue in 2015 and will
generate over $5.0 million again in 2016, a stark contrast to the average $2.285 million
generated between 2007 and 2010.
Ten percent of the total stumpage revenues generated from the county forest are
distributed to Townships that contain county forest land. Distribution is prorated and
based solely upon the total amount (percentage) of acres located within each Town. In
2016, that total amount was just over $504,000 (based on a stumpage revenue stream of
$5.04 million). Prior to 2013, towns received an average annual total payment of roughly
$220,000. In addition to the mandated 10% stumpage payment, towns also receive an
annual PILT payment (payment in lieu of taxes) from the state, at a rate of $0.30 per
acre.
Maximizing the sustainable harvest of the forest has numerous benefits. Not only does it
have the potential to significantly increase revenues, but it also supports numerous local
jobs, fosters new job growth, provides additional recreational opportunities, provides
exceptionally well managed products to local wood industries, improves forest health and
productivity, protects water quality and creates/maintains a diversity of wildlife habitat.
More Sustainable Harvest Information and Green Tree Retention
During the timber sale establishment process, scheduled stands are examined to
determine if they are indeed ready for management. Traditionally, some aren’t, leading to
approximately 10% of the sustainable harvest goal being removed from management
consideration. In general, some stands either aren’t ready for management, are typed
incorrectly or are removed from future management consideration for another reason i.e.
riparian/wetland protection, steep or inoperable slopes, special, rare or unique features,
Figure 3
22
etc. Stands that simply aren’t ready for treatment are re-scheduled for future
management. Stands that are used to protect wetlands and other riparian, sensitive,
unique, or special features are permanently removed from future harvest consideration.
After removing approximately 10% from harvest consideration, the long term net
sustainable harvest goal (actual timber sale establishment) will range between
roughly 4,000 to 4,500 acres per year. Based on the sustainable harvest goal for
2017, the expectation is that approximately 4,500 acres will be ready for
management, which equates to about 2.6% of the forest. Over the long term, when
only considering the net sustainable harvest goal, management will occur on roughly
2.3% to 2.6% of the forest per year.
Additionally, as part of the timber sale process, a representative portion of most stands
are purposely left unmanaged, termed green tree retention (also called legacy tree,
reserve tree, etc). This can be accomplished by leaving individual trees or small patches
(remnants) of the previous stand or a combination of the two. Green tree retention can
also be incorporated as part of other reasons to leave stands unmanaged i.e. BMP’s for
water quality, unique/special features or aesthetic considerations.
The goal for green tree retention is to reserve roughly 3 to 10%, of the original
stand area, as unmanaged, scattered individual trees or remnant small patches, on
each timber sale.
However, due to the nature of some stands or forested communities, green tree retention
is not always considered or feasible. For example, jack pine stands/barrens require
intensive management to maintain. Remnants of older trees provide vectors for insect or
disease outbreaks that can be devastating to newly developing stands. For that reason,
green tree retention is not applied wherever threats to young regenerating stands exist
(primarily jack or red pine) or when the regeneration of target species would otherwise be
compromised.
The retention of reserve trees (or green tree) can provide numerous benefits, all of which
ultimately contribute to the conservation of biological diversity. Among other benefits,
these structures facilitate the perpetuation of some biota (plant and animal species and
genotypes) on site. They can maintain landscape connectivity by enabling the movement of
some organisms. Reserve trees also influence reorganization and recovery processes after
a timber sale, as well as help to sustain functional roles and modify the post disturbance
environment.
Green tree retention in stands that required significant amounts of riparian protection can
add up to be substantially greater than the upper threshold of 10%. It’s fairly common to
see retention levels at 25% or greater in stands with heavy riparian protection measures.
Finally, green tree retention really only applies to stands that are managed with more
23
intensive even aged practices i.e. clearcutting, seed tree harvesting, etc. Stands that are
thinned, already leave behind more trees than those that are harvested. Of the 2.3% to
2.6% of the forest that is managed over the course of a year, roughly 55% is managed
with more intensive even aged harvests.
It’s worth nothing that a substantial portion of the forest has already been removed from
future timber management consideration. Roughly 11,000 acres, or about 6% of the
forest, have been designated and removed from the scheduling process. The reasons for
removal are numerous, many of which having been previously mentioned, and primarily
include: riparian/wetland protection; conservation of rare or unique landscapes (i.e. Glacial
Kettles and Shultz Swamp); and protection of sensitive slopes (primarily in the clay plain).
It should also be noted that, regardless of market conditions or budget shortcomings (or
anything for that matter), the sustainable harvest goals have never been, nor ever will be,
artificially inflated or adjusted. Quite simply, it is what it is, all based on sound data and
science.
Timber Sale Administration
Since 2011, the Department has sold an average of 57 new sales every year (covering
about 4,500 acres per year). This number has ranged from a low of 53 sales in 2012
(though covering nearly 4,800 acres) to a high of 64 sales in 2016 (which also covered
nearly 4,800 acres). Timber sales are sold on a two-year contract. Extensions may also be
granted, which can extend a contract up to a period of four years (and, in some cases,
longer).
Depending on the sale restrictions of the contract, markets, seasonal conditions, etc., a
contractor can choose to go active on a timber sale at virtually any time throughout a given
year. Once a timber sale goes active (actually slightly before), the Department
immediately begins the administration process.
Timber sale administration is a critically important facet of any forest management
program, as it serves to ensure field operations are in compliance with the contract and
accomplishing the goals of the sale. On a routine and regular basis (from the start of the
contract to the end), Department staff work directly with timber harvesting contractors
on all facets of the sale, including, but not limiting to, timber sale contract review,
harvesting parameters and restrictions, goals of the timber sale, road and skid trail layout,
recreational concerns (if any present), Best Management Practices for Water Quality,
monitoring of sale progress, tracking and scaling of harvested timber, etc. As part of the
process, if any issues or concerns arise, they are dealt with promptly, as per the contract.
A total of 74 timber sales went active in 2016. Timber sale activity can last anywhere
from a period of a few weeks to a few months to most of a year, depending on the size of
24
the sale, harvesting restrictions, operating conditions and the general goals of the
contractor. As of the end of CY 2016, the Department has 133 timber sales under
contract, with a total contract value of nearly $12.0 million. During any point in the year,
anywhere from around 10 to upwards of 20, or more, timber sales can be active at one
time.
The Assistant Administrator assumes the lead role in the administration of all active
timber sales. When activity ramps up, Department foresters and the DNR will provide
some assistance.
FOREST INVENTORY
Correct, up-to-date stand information is imperative in the development of accurate short
and long term sustainable harvest goals. There is a direct correlation between the quality
and accuracy of the reconnaissance data and the ability for forest managers to
confidently develop precise short and long term sustainable harvest goals. The accuracy
of any sustainable harvest goal is only as good as the data from which it was derived.
Therefore, it is important to update a certain level of stand information on an annual basis.
Table 2 summarizes the inventory goal (compartment and stands) and actual
accomplishments since 2008:
Table 2: Bayfield County Forest Inventory
(acres)
Year Goal Accomplishment
2008 17,000 9,807
2009 10,000 2,872
2010 10,000 4,079
2011 10,000 9,728
2012 10,000 8,135
2013 10,000 9,316
2014 10,000 8,552
2015 12,500 16,868
2016 12,500 10,000
2017 12,500 12,500
Average 11,450 9,186
Starting in 2014, the Department focused on updating select individual cover types rather
than entire compartments, though a few compartments were still updated. In 2014, the
two major cover types targeted for update were mature stands of red oak and mature
stands of jack pine. The goal of re-inventory was to develop a system to better prioritize
the future management of these two types.
25
In 2015 and 2016, the target species was the remaining stands of mature red oak (and
developing strategies/plans for northern hardwood), for similar reasons. In total,
approximately 2,600 acres of mature jack pine was re-inventoried in 2014 and
approximately 9,000 acres of red oak (all mature stands) were re-inventoried between late
2014 and early 2016.
In 2017, the focus will be acquiring better information on stands of northern hardwood.
One of the goals will be to develop accurate prescriptions that will incorporate growth
potential based, in part, upon site or habitat quality.
Site quality, and, subsequently, stand quality are highly variable within the northern
hardwood type. As previously stated, the prescription applied to nearly every stand, by
default, has been all-aged management (individual tree selection). While this prescription
is preferred over much of the cover type, it is not sustainable on many of the low end
moderate, and nearly all of the poor quality sites. The goal of northern hardwood re-
inventory is to better capture site and stand quality as part of the silvicultural
prescription.
Once the re-inventory is complete, it is anticipated that the total acreage slated for all-
aged management will decrease slightly, with a small increase in even-aged management
(especially on the poor to moderately poor quality sites). However, the use of group
selection as an alternative to the traditional individual tree selection method may be
applied on moderate to poor quality sites. This will maintain a more uneven-aged structure
and allow mature stands to perpetuate on the landscape (and maintain structural diversity).
The total update goal for 2017 will remain 12,500 acres. Of that, roughly 3,000
acres will be in the form of a compartment update. The rest will be in the form of
northern hardwood stand updates. Since 2001, 185 of 202 compartments, totaling
over 151,000 acres have been updated. The goal is to re-inventory the remaining 17
compartments over the next 4 years. Once completed, it will put the Department
on pace to achieve the 15-year re-inventory goal. At which time, a 15 year,
modified re-inventory cycle will be implemented.
When updating entire compartments, priorities will be placed on those that contain a
larger percentage of old data (≥20 years old), as well as compartments that contain a
larger percentage of stands prescribed for management in the near future.
REFORESTATION
Reforestation, be it natural or artificial, is a core building block of forest sustainability
and a fundamental component of any forest management program.
26
A successful reforestation program provides numerous benefits, some of which include:
the restoration of forest productivity, fertility and environmental function; the assurance
of a perpetual, sustainable supply of forest resources and amenities for future
generations; the protection of soil and water quality; and the establishment and
development of quality wildlife habitat.
Table 3 summarizes the reforestation efforts that are planned for 2017:
Table 3: Bayfield County Forest Reforestation Program Summary 2008 - 2017 (acres)
Seeding Monitoring
Red Pine Jack Pine White Pine Other1 Jack Pine Trench Fire Plow Scarify Spray Fire Spray Bud Cap Regen
2008 378 207 24 0 0 796 88 0 442 0 0 0 1,683
2009 487 415 0 0 0 726 72 0 348 40 0 0 2,652
2010 367 196 0 0 0 363 118 0 420 42 305 0 2,183
2011 319 153 35 68 0 900 88 0 186 21 324 0 1,424
2012 295 107 274 0 0 0 177 120 727 32 609 0 2,736
2013 281 174 92 0 558 264 0 40 0 0 449 239 2,522
2014 0 0 0 0 0 503 20 115 264 0 273 239 2,929
2015 62 0 129 0 202 717 0 99 634 0 0 239 2,337
20162 334 39 0 0 393 450 0 100 496 0 230 209 2,500
2017 44 0 0 0 460 250 0 300 570 0 180 132 3,000
Avg.257 129 55 7 161 497 56 77 409 14 237 106 2,397
1 In 2011, tamarack and white spruce.
2 Estimates.
Year Planting Site Preparation Maintenance
Spring Planting
The planting program has changed significantly since 2013. Between 2008 and 2013, an
average of 350 acres of red pine, 210 acres of jack pine and 70 acres of white pine were
planted every year. Since 2013, the average has been 110 acres of red pine, 10 acres of
jack pine and 30 acres of white pine. In addition, prior to 2013, 0 acres of jack pine was
artificially seeded. From 2013 through 2017, an average of nearly 330 acres of jack pine
has been seeded per year.
The primary reasons for the changes in the reforestation program (planting and seeding)
are as follows: 1) re-planting of the old fuel break areas has been completed. The last
remaining 144 acres was seeded to jack pine in 2016; 2) a general lack of previously open
areas, which, in the past, were planted to red pine; 3) a lack of mature red pine stands
that are ready for regeneration; 4) movement towards primarily jack pine regeneration in
the Barnes Barrens Management Area; 5) an emphasis on seeding when attempting to
regenerate jack pine; 6) much of the acreage planted during the early 2000’s was in direct
response to severe defoliation and subsequent mortality related to an outbreak of jack
pine bud worm.
As mentioned above, one direction over the past decade plus was to reforest some of the
previously established fuel breaks. The breaks were/are located in the barrens area,
south of Iron River and north of Barnes. These breaks were approximately ¼ mile wide by
a few miles long and were maintained in a grass state. In theory, the breaks would provide
27
a first level of defense if an intensive wild fire were to occur. Portions of the break still
exist near the Potawatomi sub-division, but a majority of the breaks have been
reforested.
In total, roughly 1,300 acres of old fuel break have been reforested, primarily to red pine,
but also some jack pine. Approximately 350 acres still exist near the sub-division. As part
of the local wildfire mitigation plan, the Department now incorporates wider harvest
corridors along road rights of way in an attempt to increase the defensible space (the goal
is to maintain a grass or fuel free zone at least 50 feet in width on each side of a road
corridor). Also, an additional fuel break road (averaging 100 feet in width) was established
between Barnes and Weldon roads, to provide another level of defense in an area where
some private development exists.
In 2016, 334 acres were planted with containerized red pine stock, which also included 131
acres that were re-planted (routine monitoring revealed survival counts lower than target
levels – so sites were re-planted). Also, 39 acres were planted with containerized jack
pine stock.
In 2017, approximately 44 acres will be planted with containerized red pine, with a total of
approximately 35,000 seedlings (planted at a rate of roughly 800 seedlings per acre).
In the future, the general expectation is that red pine plantings will hover between 100
and 200 acres or less per year, while white pine under plantings will vary, depending on the
availability of suitable sites. We will continue to analyze red pine to determine if there is
a need to begin regeneration harvests sooner, in an attempt to evenly distribute age
classes over the landscape. If so, annual harvests, and subsequent reforestation levels,
would be adjusted accordingly.
Spring Seeding
The seeding program also changed significantly over the past few years. Before 2013, the
Department had generally moved away from artificial seeding. Starting in 2013, the
Department began implementing objectives that were developed in the Barnes Barrens
Management Plan. Among other things, the plan identifies a preference to regenerate a
jack pine dominated landscape (within the Barrens area), with artificial seeding as the
preferred reforestation method. Seeding is preferred primarily because of the potential
to create a more naturally regenerating landscape.
Before a site is seeded it needs to be mechanically prepped and usually sprayed. This
provides a better seedbed for the delicate jack pine seed to germinate and develop. Also,
there needs to be enough acres available before local contractors are interested in the
work. Many of the acres that were trenched in 2015 were also sprayed in 2016. These
sites would then be seeded in 2017.
28
The timing of timber harvests also has a direct impact on how many acres will be available
for reforestation. As previously stated, timber sales are sold under two year contracts.
The contractor can request up to two - one year extensions (meaning it can take up to four
years to complete the sale).
In 2017, approximately 460 acres will be seeded with jack pine, using about 115 pounds of
seed (seeded at a rate of roughly 4 ounces per acre).
Site Preparation
In 2017, approximately 250 acres are planned for site preparation via power trenching,
570 acres will be treated with chemical and 0 acres will be fire plowed. Site preparation
goals reflect the amount of known sales that have been completed within the past year
(and are in need of site prep). Occasionally, other timber sales are finished in time for
addition to site prep goals. When that happens, the goal is adjusted accordingly, as
budgets allow.
In addition, approximately 300 acres of red oak, paper birch and/or northern hardwoods
will be scarified, usually with a dozer and straight blade. Scarification will facilitate the
natural regeneration of red oak and paper birch, as well as reduce competition from non-
desirable species, such as ironwood and, in some stands, red maple. Much of this work is
accomplished by DNR staff, with DNR equipment. If fire plow sites become available in
2017, there may be some additional acres treated, again, as budgets allow.
Release
The spraying (release) of young red pine plantations is treated on an as needed basis.
Occasionally, young plantations need treatment in order to release seedlings from
undesirable vegetative competition. This release can significantly increase seedling growth
and improve the rate of survival. In 2017, approximately 180 acres of young red pine
plantations may be aerial sprayed to release the conifers from competition. These stands
will be monitored once again in the spring before determining if release is required.
Similarly, a few stands may be added if determined to be in need of treatment.
The prescribed burn program, for the regeneration and/or maintenance of specific timber
types (typically red oak), is still under review to gauge the effectiveness of fire. As a
result, 0 acres will be burned in 2017, though the DNR still maintains portions of the fuel
break via prescribed fire. Currently, roughly 125 acres of existing fuel break is scheduled
for maintenance via prescribed fire. This work is accomplished by the DNR with DNR
staff and equipment. Department staff may provide some assistance with prescribed
burning.
29
Timber stand improvement (or TSI) may also be prescribed on regenerating stands in need
of maintenance. In 2017, 0 acres are scheduled for TSI (which typically involve chain or
brush saws to remove undesirable trees). However, stands of red oak, northern hardwood,
paper birch or others in need of maintenance, may be considered, as conditions and
budgets allow.
In the future, it is anticipated that some form of TSI will be required to improve the
growth potential and survival of desired regeneration in many previously managed
hardwood stands i.e. northern hardwoods, red oak, birch, etc., as well as some conifer
stands (primarily white pine under plantings). Internally, time is a limiting factor, as
mechanical hand release is very labor intensive. The Department may need to develop TSI
contracts to manage the anticipated workload.
Seedling Protection
Starting in 2013, the Department used bud caps to protect young jack pine seedlings from
browsing by white tailed deer. In total, 239 acres were bud capped. This literally involves
stapling a 3”x 3” piece of copy paper over the terminal bud/leader of each planted
seedling. The reason: plantation monitoring in this area has shown signs of excessive deer
browsing. Failure to protect the seedlings could lead to plantation failure. Bud capping
would need to be repeated every year until the seedlings are beyond the reach of the
deer, which typically takes 3 or 4 years. Currently, the focus is on stands that are planted
with containerized jack pine (as these seedlings are a little more nutrient rich when
compared to bare root stock or natural regeneration).
These same stands were capped in 2014 and 2015. One stand reached the desired height
and was removed from capping in 2016. A few more have attained the desired height
conditions and will be removed in 2017. The goal for 2017 will be 132 acres. Because most
of the jack pine in the future will be regenerated via seed, bud capping will most likely only
be used when absolutely necessary, and mostly on jack pine stands that were planted with
containerized stock.
The Department also maintains two large scale deer exclusion fences on the forest. Both
were constructed with eight-foot-tall, high tensile woven wire. A 29-acre exclusion is
located south of Oulu and was installed during the spring of 2007. While a 50-acre
exclusion is located south of Cable and was installed during the fall of 2008. Both fences
were constructed on stands being actively managed for red oak. Both locations are
routinely monitored to study the growth and development of regeneration and to better
understand the potential influences of browsing by deer.
Both fence locations have also been recently harvested, where the over story was removed
to allow established regeneration to recruit. Each site will continue to be monitored to
evaluate the effectiveness of the fence. The fences will also be maintained throughout
30
this process, with the goal of eventual removal once seedlings have established and
attainted dominance.
A few smaller scale fences (less than ¼ acre in size) have also been constructed on the
forest. These are much smaller in size, but still intended to monitor the impacts of
excessive browsing by white tailed deer. As we monitor regeneration in stands of
northern hardwoods (and red oak), small exclusion fencing may also be installed around
canopy gaps as a way to monitor regeneration and potential browsing impacts. This will
occur as time and budgets allow.
Natural Regeneration
The majority of stands managed by the Department regenerate naturally i.e. they do not
require site preparation, planting or seeding in the reforestation process. In 2017,
thousands of acres, across a variety of forest types, will be naturally regenerated. The
exact amount is solely dependent on the total number of acres harvested in previous years.
Forest types such as northern hardwoods and aspen regenerate naturally via seed, stump
sprouting and/or coppicing (vegetative sprouting from existing root system) and require
very little additional input from the Department. However, the natural regeneration of
hardwood forest types such as red oak and paper birch often require additional
Departmental maintenance efforts.
As stated numerous times above, natural regeneration monitoring is also revealing
excessive ironwood competition in stands of northern hardwoods. These stands may
require additional inputs from the Department in order to achieve the desired future
stand condition.
Examples of additional inputs to aid in the natural regeneration process include: pre or
post sale site scarification to prepare a favorable seed bed and reduce competition, pre or
post sale burning or timber stand improvement (TSI) to reduce competition from
undesirable tree seedlings and/or prepare favorable seedbeds, and deer browse protection
i.e. fencing, repellents, etc. to improve the tree seedlings chance of survival. These
additional inputs occur when issues or opportunities arise and are treated on a case by
case basis.
Seedling Counts
All planted and seeded sites and many areas that were regenerated naturally require
survival or regeneration counts. Data collected from the counts are used to determine
stocking levels of desired tree species and, ultimately, to evaluate the success of the
reforestation activity.
31
Seedling counts are generally administered at one, two, three, five and ten years after the
regeneration activity on most planted and seeded sites. Seedling counts on naturally
regenerating hardwood stands are typically administered two to four years after harvest
(depending on the forest type) and also include one to two additional surveys to determine
success. Some stands may receive additional monitoring after 10 years of age, especially
if issues are discovered or if stands aren’t responding to treatment.
In 2017, seedling counts will be administered on roughly 1,700 acres of sites that
were regenerated artificially (planted or seeded) and on roughly 1,300 acres of
sites regenerated naturally (primarily stands of northern hardwood and red oak).
Counts administered on natural sites generally focus on: stands that may require
additional inputs i.e. mechanical scarification, prescribed fire, etc.; cover types that are
typically difficult to regenerate i.e. red oak, paper birch; stands where competition from
undesirable species has traditionally been more prevalent i.e. ironwood in stands of
northern hardwood; and stands that have a history of excessive browsing from white
tailed deer.
Prescribed Fire
Prescribed fires has traditionally been used to maintain portions of the fuel breaks
located in the Township of Barnes, as well as to facilitate natural red oak reproduction in
stands located throughout the county forest.
In 2017, 0 acres of forested stands will be treated with prescribed fire, where the goal is
to facilitate the regeneration of certain tree species i.e. red oak. However, portions of
the existing fuel breaks may be treated with fire, if conditions allow. Fuel break burns
are coordinated by the DNR.
In 2017, it is anticipated that the DNR will burn approximately 125 acres of existing fuel
break off Blue Lake Road in the Town of Barnes. County staff has always been invited to
assist in the process and generally do, if time allows.
WILDLIFE
A number of wildlife projects will again be undertaken in 2017. The majority of wildlife
habitat improvement work conducted on county forest land will be accomplished utilizing
funding from Wisconsin DNR grant programs, specifically, the County Conservation Aids
and Nickel-an-Acre programs.
The Nickel-an-Acre program reflects a change from the previous Dime-an-Acre funding.
As indicated in the name, the program funding was cut in half starting in 2010 and will
continue to be funded at a nickel an acre into the foreseeable future. The County
Conservation Aid grant requires a 50% county match on eligible projects.
32
The Conservation Aids project for 2017 have yet to be determined. There traditionally
has been approximately $3,993 available for eligible projects. Additional monies may also
be available, as determined by the total amount of unallocated funds.
The Nickel-an-Acre grant totals roughly $8,467. This grant has been used to fund a
variety of County Forest wildlife projects in the past.
Potential projects for 2017 could include, but are not limited to:
Site prep and seeding for jack pine in the Barnes Barrens Management Area.
Mechanical and/or chemical treatments for wildlife opening maintenance (currently
roughly 100 acres combined per year).
Wildlife habitat development/improvement throughout the forest.
Mechanical site prep for natural white birch, red oak or northern hardwood
regeneration.
Prescribed burning of wildlife openings and oak regeneration areas.
Fish habitat projects.
Habitat projects on old homesteads.
Wildlife monitoring.
Breeding bird surveys.
Land acquisition.
Trail development and renovation (primarily for hunting access).
Trail mowing and/or game opening maintenance.
Equipment purchase (where the equipment would have a specific benefit wildlife
habitat).
Invasive species control and eradication.
Deer exclosures for red oak regeneration (fencing).
Seedling protection (bud capping, spraying, etc.).
Any of the above listed projects, or those of a similar nature, could be implemented in
2017, generally as conditions and funding allow.
ACCESS MANAGEMENT
The revised Access Management Plan (Chapter 700) was finalized and approved in 2013.
Implementation of the Plan began in 2014 and will continue through 2017. The focus will
be on the placement of road and trail markers, informational signage, minor repairs of
existing roads and trails, evaluation of and potential changes to current use designations
and the installation or removal of restrictive features (i.e. berms, gates, etc.) to manage
motorized access.
Also, the Department will monitor existing road and trail infrastructure to determine
future use status or need. All new roads created as part of a timber sale will also need to
33
be reviewed to determine the future use status. Motorized and non-motorized uses are
consistently increasing. The Department will continue to address recreational needs and
requests on a case by case basis.
Repair and maintenance of the infrastructure will occur on an as needed basis, as funding
allows. Road building projects may also be developed, especially on those that receive high
levels of use, are located in more sensitive areas in need of minor attention, and/or provide
access into current or future timber sales and have the potential to increase future
stumpage prices. Road projects can be performed by Department staff, DNR staff or
general contractors.
The Access Management plan will also be reviewed periodically to determine effectiveness
and/or in response to general feedback. Any and all proposed updates to the Plan will be
presented to the Committee for review.
The Department will continue to maintain roughly 40 miles of Primary Forest roads, for
which we receive DOT County Forest Road Aids (currently $336/mile, which is pro-rated
based on available funding). The Department will also continue to identify, plan and/or
develop additional forest roads and trails, as the need arises, for later entry into the
County Forest Road program.
BAYFIELD COUNTY FOREST PLAN
The existing County Forest Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the period 2006 – 2020 may
be amended to reflect changes and/or updates. Some items that may require updating in
2017 include, but are not limited to:
Integrated Resource Management Unit (IRMU) summaries.
IRMU boundaries.
Barnes Barrens Management Plan summary.
Timber sale contract language.
Firewood permit language.
Miscellaneous forest products permit language.
Timber sale rutting policy.
Forest certification (addition of FSC).
Silvicultural revisions/updates on individual forest types.
Updates to specific sections of the Plan.
It is fully anticipated that the updating process to certain sections of the Plan will begin in
2017. At this time, it is not fully known which sections will be updated first. Chapters
600 (Protection), 500 (Land Management and Use) and 800 (Integrated Resource
Management) are all high on the priority list. All updates would be addressed by the
Committee, will incorporate a level of public input/involvement and eventually be addressed
by the full Board for final approval.
34
OTHER ACTIVITIES
Recreation:
The Department will continue to work with the County Tourism Department and interested
user groups regarding recreational activities occurring on the county forest. The demand
for recreational use on county forest land continues to increase.
Over the past few years, the Forestry and Parks Committee has approved numerous re-
routes of snowmobile and ATV trails, the construction of new, and re-routes of existing,
mountain bike and cross country ski trail networks and numerous improvements to existing
hiking, mountain bike and cross country ski trails.
Requests to host events on trails located within the forest continues to increase as well.
Some of the more notable events that utilize portions of trails located on the forest
include: the American Birkebeiner Cross Country Ski Race, the Chequamegon Fat Tire
Mountain Bike Race, the Cable Area Off-Road Classic Mountain Bike Race and the Apostle
Islands Sled Dog Race. Over the past few years, the Department (Committee) approves an
average of approximately twenty (20) organized events per year that utilize trails located
on the county forest.
The Department also maintains land or recreational use agreements with a variety of
organizations, some of which include: the American Birkebeiner Association, CAMBA,
North Country Trail Association, North End Ski Club, Ashwabay Outdoor Education
Foundation, National Fish Hatchery, Town of Barnes and more. In general, the use
agreements highlight specific areas or trails within the forest and outline management or
use requirements expected from each organization. Use requests are treated on a case by
case basis and require approval from the Committee.
Requests for new or improvements to existing motorized and non-motorized trail systems
are expected to continue in 2017 and beyond. Requests for additional trails will be
treated on a case by case basis, as per the Access Management Plan.
Counters have been installed in a variety of settings to determine actual use of certain
trails and/or areas. Data received from these counters will provide the county with
valuable information needed to determine future direction. Counters will continue to be
installed throughout the forest to monitor usage in 2017.
Throughout any given year, the Department will explore additional opportunities to
enhance and improve the recreational use of the forest. Existing networks are routinely
analyzed and areas are explored for new or improved recreational potential. Some
potential projects for 2017 include:
35
1. Finish minor repairs and signing of the Lost Creek Falls Trail. Due to an abundance
of trail use, the Department may also install a temporary portable restroom at the
Lost Creek Falls trail head.
2. Maintenance of the two newly constructed yurts on County Forest land. During the
summer of 2016, one yurt was constructed in the Cable area and one near Mt.
Ashwabay. An alternative access route is being considered for the Mt. Ashwabay
yurt and may be established in 2017.
3. Explore the potential for additional yurt locations. If any are located, develop a
plan and budget and present for future consideration, most likely as part of the
2018 budget.
4. Re-evaluate the Jolly network. As part of the process, determine existing uses and
future direction. Also re-explore partnerships with the Ashwabay Outdoor
Education Foundation, as well as the Town of Bayfield, regarding future
maintenance and grooming of the trails.
5. Explore the potential of creating new, or improvements to existing, multi-use, non-
motorized trails at numerous locations including: the Glacial Kettles Area, Spring
Creek Area, the Menard Road Area and Big Rock Campground and/or other locations
throughout the Forest where good potential exists. It may also require submitting
applications to one or more grants, to assist in any requirements related to planning,
development or construction. Pursue as time and funding allows.
6. Explore the potential of improving or expanding the existing motorized trail
networks on public and private lands (both state funded and non-funded). This may
require collaborating with other public land managers i.e. USFS, DNR, etc., the Red
Cliff Tribe, interested user groups and the general public. It may also require
submitting applications to one or more grants, to assist in any requirements related
to planning, development or construction. Pursue as time and funding allows.
7. Explore the potential of creating dispersed rustic camping sites on other portions
of the county forest. Pursue as time and funding allows.
8. Develop and implement strategies for advertising and/or promoting recreation on
the county forest. This may include collaborating with the Tourism Department, as
well as other agencies or local businesses where tourism is a primary objective.
Pursue as time and funding allows.
9. Generate a new recreational trail development and maintenance strategy, with an
emphasis on identifying critical trail connections and areas for new construction or
enhancement. The plan would/could include strategies for both motorized and non-
motorized recreation, as well as the development of incentives or other
appreciation type programs for private landowners when trails are located on
private land.
10. Continue working with existing user groups on the management of approved trails
located within (or otherwise connected to trails located on) the forest. This could
include assistance, both financially and/or physically, associated with the
construction, maintenance or development of new or existing trails and trail heads.
36
Also includes consultation and collaboration regarding potential re-routes or other
issues pertaining to the management of the trails.
11. Update the GIS database to accurately reflect the location and relevant
information regarding all currently approved motorized and non-motorized trails,
trail heads, recreational structures and access routes on the forest.
12. Development and installation of interpretive signs and/or kiosks along popular or
well used trails or areas. The goal of the signs would be to convey information
regarding any timber management that did or will occur in the general proximity of
the recreational trail or area. The signs would be fairly general in nature and
intended to provide baseline information regarding forest management. Funding for
portions of this work has already been approved by the state, as per various DNR
fire assistance grants.
Insects and Disease:
The DNR and Department are continuing to monitor the effects of forest insects such as
the jack pine budworm, two-lined chestnut borer, emerald ash borer (though not currently
located on the forest), and gypsy moth. If any additional sites containing a significant
amount of damage are discovered, they will be promptly managed. Also, as new threats are
encountered, the Department may need to alter management plans accordingly.
The most notable “new” threat regarding the overall health of the forest is the gypsy
moth. Gypsy moth numbers, and subsequent defoliation, had been previously observed in
very high numbers in the Bayfield Peninsula. The greatest numbers have been found along
higher elevations located in the general vicinity of Jammer Hill and Echo Valley Roads. Red
oak and aspen are their preferred primary food sources and are the most susceptible to
potential mortality, especially the suppressed and over mature individuals (red oak being of
most concern). Significant defoliation of red oak and aspen occurred in these areas during
the summer of 2012.
However, egg mass numbers declined dramatically in 2013 and remained low in 2014 and
2015, and relatively low in 2016, indicating that defoliation may only be minor in 2017 and
beyond. As a result, we will resume all red oak management in the areas where egg mass
counts were high in 2012 (currently IRMU’s 1 and 8). If gypsy moth numbers significantly
increase in 2017, oak management may be adjusted accordingly. If oak management is
reduced in specific units, the sustainable goal in all other units may be adjusted
accordingly.
The Department is continuing to work with the DNR regarding up to date information and
management recommendations, as well as determining the best course of action regarding
general forest management practices in the face of a threatening gypsy moth defoliation
event or any other impact by insects or disease.
Emerald ash borer (EAB) was discovered in Douglas County and, most recently, in Sawyer
37
County, our neighbors to the west and south. As a result, those counties have been
quarantined, meaning, in general, that there are now restrictions on the movement of wood.
To date, EAB has not been discovered in Bayfield County. However, based on current
locations, discovery in Bayfield County is inevitable.
It is estimated that ash contributes less than 0.5% of annual stumpage revenues and is
present, as a dominant forest type, on less than 1.0% of the county forest. Other than
targeting ash a little more often during management (and encouraging the regeneration of
other suitable species), Bayfield County is not expecting a major change in forest
management practices if/when EAB is found on the forest, though the movement of ash
products would be regulated if/when quarantined.
Invasive Species:
The Department routinely inspects roads and timber sales for the presence of invasive
species. If located, a plan for treatment is developed. The presence of invasive species
(both native and non-native) is relatively rare on the Forest. The Department typically
treats a few small patches of land per year.
The most common non-native invasive species treated on the county forest are buckthorn
(in the forest) and spotted knapweed (on roads and trails). Black locust has been the most
common native invasive to be treated on the forest, typically occurring in small isolated
patches in the vicinity of old, abandoned homesteads.
Treatments have traditionally been performed by Department staff, usually involving
chemicals. In general, the Department treats less than 10 acres of invasive species per
year. In 2017, that number is expected to be as high as 50 acres. Consequently, it may
become necessary to contract out treatment, especially if other Department activities
require more time or become higher priority. All occurrences are managed on a case by
case basis, as funding allows.
In 2014, the Department received a Sustainable Forestry Grant for the treatment of
spotted knapweed on 50 miles of forest roads in the Barnes Barrens Management Area.
The project was completed in 2015. However, spotted knapweed maintains a persistent
and viable seedbed for around 7 years, meaning multiple successive treatments are
required to reduce the population.
The same 50 miles of road was treated in 2016 and will be treated again in 2017. The long
term goal is to use herbicide to manage and eventually eliminate (or significantly reduce)
knapweed in the area and, hopefully, prevent any further spread into the barrens. The
project focuses on roads that are the most heavily infested, but more still needs to be
done.
38
Permits:
Every year, the Department reviews numerous requests to utilize portions of the Forest.
Requests vary, but the most commonly include: providing access to private lands; providing
access to land or trails for hosting organized recreational events; collecting balsam
boughs; and collecting firewood. All requests are treated on a case by case basis and are
typically handled with a use permit.
Table 4 summarizes the total permits and approvals issued by the Department from 2008-
2016 (2016 is an estimates):
Table 4: Bayfield County Forest Summary of Issued Permits and Approvals
Fire Balsam Christmas Birch Disabled
Wood Boughs Trees Stems Hunting
2008 360 8 0 1 0 2 9 3 1
2009 423 5 1 1 0 0 10 3 1
2010 436 5 1 1 0 3 10 3 2
2011 503 7 1 6 0 9 10 10 2
2012 441 6 1 7 0 8 12 7 2
2013 406 16 13 3 2 6 17 6 2
2014 486 9 6 4 1 7 21 5 2
2015 394 8 5 5 0 10 18 9 1
2016 450 8 5 4 1 8 18 8 1
Avg.433 8 4 4 0 6 14 6 2
Cones Access StorageYearEvents
Many of the permit templates are old or outdated. The Department will periodically
review existing permits, including permit fees, or identify the need for new ones and bring
all recommendations to the Committee for review.
Town Road Aids:
In 2010, Bayfield County developed the Town Road Aid Fund. This fund was created to
help improve problem areas on Town Roads that provide critical access to the County
Forest. Town Road Aids were initially funded at 1% of total annual timber sale revenues
(enacted once actual revenues exceed the budgeted amount). Starting in CY 2014,
Bayfield County increased the funding level to 2%, with a cap of $80,000. As a result, in
CY 2016, there was $80,000 available for eligible Town Road projects.
It is anticipated that $80,000 will be available in 2017. All projects are submitted to the
Department and ultimately approved by the Forestry and Parks Committee. The
Department works closely with each Town in the development and administration of each
potential project.
39
Land Acquisition:
The Department will continue efforts to acquire private properties on a willing seller,
willing buyer basis, when advantageous to the long term goals of Bayfield County. A
priority will be given to land located within the existing county forest blocking.
In December 2014, the Department received preliminarily approval for two Knowles-
Nelson Stewardship Land Acquisition Grants. The grants were officially awarded in June
2015. As a result, Bayfield County purchased 1,392 acres from Meteor Timber and 463
acres from Lyme Timber. Additionally, the county provided a match of 747 acres of
county owned, non-county forest land. In total, 2,602 acres of land was added to the
county forest.
By using the appraised value of county owned land as the required match, the Department
can tailor projects that significantly reduce (or eliminate) out of pocket expenses. The
Meteor Timber and Lyme Timber acquisition projects totaled roughly $2.616 million
(including the cost of land, appraisals and other associated fees). The county received
approximately $2.265 million from the Stewardship grant (primarily from the appraised
value of matched lands). As a result, the county spent roughly $350,000, out of pocket, to
purchase over $2.6 million in productive forest land.
In the most recent state budget, county forests received a separate line of appropriation
under the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Grant for $5.0 million each year. The county still
maintains ownership of approximately 245 acres of non-county forest lands that could be
used as a match in future Stewardship projects. These properties were appraised at
$423,000, meaning they would have roughly $211,500 worth of buying (match) power (as
per the Grant, properties owned for more than one year are valued at ½ of the appraised
assessment).
As previously mentioned, in late fall 2016, the county purchased another 198 acres of land
previously owned by the Wisconsin DNR. Combined, these two acquisitions have added
2,800 acres to the county forest.
In 2017, the Department will continue to examine the potential for future Stewardship
projects, or other similar grant options, for the purpose of purchasing forest land, using
the above mentioned or other suitable county owned, non-county forest lands, as well as
donations or cash, as a match.
Forestry and Parks Department Garage and Equipment
Periodic and general maintenance will be required on the newly constructed Forestry and
Parks Department garage (construction finished in the fall 2014), including minor work on
the grounds and landscaping.
40
The installation of new overhangs that would have extended over the eave side entry doors
was not completed in 2016. It is anticipated that previously approved funding will carry
over in 2017, with the work completed late spring or early summer.
The Department maintains a sizeable fleet of vehicles, implements and equipment,
including, but not limited to:
1. Eight (8) 4x4 pickup trucks.
2. Five (5) ATV’s.
3. One (1) UTV.
4. Three (3) snowmobiles.
5. One (1) bat wing field mower and one (1) trail mower.
6. One (1) 2002 115 hp New Holland TM115 tractor, with end loader.
7. One (1) 2006 John Deere 450J bulldozer.
8. Two (2) light weight trailers.
9. Numerous site prep implements including Brackee seeders, anchor chains, and
various plows.
10. Numerous power tools, saws and trimmers.
The repair and maintenance on any of the above listed items could occur at any time during
CY 2017. All repairs are treated on a case by case basis, as budgets allow. Major repairs
(or replacements) may require funding that would exceeded budgeted amounts. If that
occurs, additional requests for funding will be brought to the Committee and full Board.
Management of Other Bayfield County Owned Lands:
Currently, Bayfield County owns approximately 2,000 acres of county tax title lands, not
including lots and other small parcels, in addition to the above listed county forests Lands.
Also, the county owns approximately 3,100 acres of land located in the Bibon Swamp.
On occasion, the Department will monitor these parcels for land and/or timber sales,
monitor for potential trespass issues, negotiate road, utility and recreational easements or
permits and explore for sand and gravel potential. As new parcels are acquired, typically
through tax delinquency, the Department will commonly inspect for timber management
potential and/or for potential retention and enrollment into County Forest Law.
Good Neighbor Authority:
The US Forest Service has been authorized to enter into cooperative agreements with
states to carry out approved forest, rangeland and watershed restoration services,
including timber sales, on federal land, as per the Good Neighbor Authority (GNA). Under
a cooperative agreement between the US Forest Service and the DNR, the DNR may
conduct forest management activities on federal lands. Further, the DNR may contract
with a county for the purposes of conducting forest management activities on federal
41
lands, as outlined under the GNA agreement.
Recently (fall 2015), the DNR and the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest (CNNF)
signed a ten year GNA Agreement, which will be reviewed annually to update the scope of
work, as well as to identify additional timber and restoration treatments. The partnership
enables the CNNF to more fully implement their forest plan and increase the amount of
timber offered for sale. The goal for the CNNF in FY 2017 is to again reach 100 million
board feet in timber sales. Through the GNA, the DNR has a goal of assisting the CNNF
in accomplishing approximately 25 million board feet (roughly 5,500 acres) of additional
timber sales in FY 2017 (that may not have been established otherwise).
The DNR anticipates 15 to 20% of the timber sale work identified under the Agreement to
be accomplished by interested counties. If interested, a county can decide their level of
involvement, which could include the use of existing staff or hiring part time employees.
Counties would be reimbursed for all expenses, including salary, fringe, supplies and
service costs, and overhead. Also, if interested, each county would need to adopt a
resolution, which approves entering into an MOU with the DNR. As per the MOU, each
county would be required to enter into a GNA program contract with the State, which
describes the level of involvement and project budget (i.e. rates of reimbursement).
In spring 2016, Bayfield County entered into a GNA MOU with the DNR. As part of the
MOU, the county agreed to become a contractor of the state, with the ultimate goal of
assisting in the establishment of timber sales on federal land. Program contracts are
established with the state on an annual basis and subject to a mutually agreed upon scope
of work. The Department will continue to work with the state on the development of
annual GNA program contracts.
The scope of work defines the level of involvement the Department is willing to provide,
outlines general goals and expected accomplishments and establishes an estimated budget.
All salary, fringe, supplies, services and overhead costs, contributed by the county as per
the GNA program contract, are reimbursed by the state. All work provided by
Department staff related to GNA will come as overtime, as the Department has no time to
spare during normal business hours. The scope of work is subject to annual revisions and
Department involvement will be highly dependent on opportunities located within the
Washburn Ranger District.
In 2017, it is anticipated that the Department could allocate roughly 500 hours of time
towards the establishment of timber sales on Federal land within the Washburn Ranger
District. Again, this would be as overtime (and totally dependent upon interest from
Department staff), which would be identified and reimbursed as such under any GNA
program contract signed with the DNR.
42
PARKS
The management of all Bayfield County parks and campgrounds was assigned to the
Forestry Department in September 2010. The four parks and campgrounds include:
1. Twin Bear Campground
2. Delta Lake Campground
3. Big Rock Campground
4. Atkins Lake Park
Since 2010, numerous changes and upgrades have been made to many of the campgrounds.
Some of the more significant improvements include:
1. Twin Bear Campground
a. Complete electrical rebuild and upgrade throughout entire campground.
b. Repair of all major outbuildings and cabin.
c. New fishing pier near the beach area.
d. New ADA ramp construction near beach area.
e. Creation of new tent camping site.
f. Re-establishment of sand beach.
g. New individual gas water heaters for each of the three showers.
h. New playground equipment near the beach area.
i. Re-surfacing of walking path near Puig’s Point.
j. New wireless high speed internet access throughout the entire campground.
k. New locks/keysets on all outbuildings (all keyed the same).
l. Added canoe and kayak rentals.
2. Delta Lake Campground
a. Complete re-grade on nearly all existing campsites.
b. New playground equipment near beach area.
c. New fishing pier.
d. Repair of all major outbuildings.
e. New electric added to remaining campsites.
f. New wireless high speed internet access throughout the entire campground.
g. Installation of new mooring dock and small picnic area.
h. Modifications to the ADA ramp/path.
i. New locks/keysets on all outbuildings (all keyed the same).
j. Added canoe and kayak rentals.
All parks and campgrounds undergo routine cleanup of brush and downed trees on a regular
basis. Parks and campgrounds are also regularly inspected for hazard trees and branches,
which are removed as needed. The removal of hazard trees or branches typically occurs
when camping is inactive, usually in the late fall or early spring. Most of the trees are cut
43
up and left on site to be used as firewood. Every year, there will be some removal of
hazard trees and/or branches.
Some anticipated projects or minor repairs needed to the parks and campgrounds in 2017
include:
1. Twin Bear Campground
a. Continue hazard tree removal and overhead branch mitigation, as needed.
b. Inspection of retaining walls on a few campsites for future repair.
c. Re-grade on a few existing campsites and road surfaces.
d. Explore the need to add gutters on the cabin store to divert water away
from the entrance to the building.
e. Explore the potential for two new tent campsites on the hill behind shower
building. Clear area and remove hazard trees. Develop as funding allows.
f. Install/re-establish speed bumps at multiple locations.
g. Install fencing around new electrical box near garage.
h. Upgrade/repair fence around garage.
i. Replacement of numerous old picnic tables.
j. Transplant trees from hill behind the shower building to the perimeter of
the beach to provide future shade.
k. Draft and implement a noxious weed mitigation plan for the campground.
Continue to monitor for new infestations. Treat as required.
l. Replace entire mooring network with new docks. Install additional mooring
docks, if needed.
m. Monitor existing infrastructure, repair as needed and as budgets allow.
2. Delta Lake Campground
a. Evaluate the condition of all primitive toilets in the campground. Replace as
necessary.
b. Re-deck and/or rebuild the ADA access ramp near the beach area.
c. Explore potential of tent camping on County owned island.
d. Some minor clean up and rehabilitation of grounds may still be necessary
after the winter 2014/2015 timber sale, which removed all hazardous trees.
e. Replacement of numerous old picnic tables.
f. Monitor existing infrastructure, repair as needed and as budgets allow.
3. Big Rock Campground
a. Explore the potential of adding a covered pavilion near entrance of
campground.
b. Minor repair on access roads. Most likely will require additional surface
material.
c. Explore potential of developing a primitive walking/nature trail within the
44
40-acre county parcel.
d. Replacement of numerous picnic tables.
e. Explore the potential of developing a hike in campsite or yurt on the
property.
f. Possible replacement of a door on one of the bathrooms.
4. Atkins Lake Park
a. Replace sign leading into the park.
b. Replacement of dock and old picnic tables, if necessary.
Numerous unknown issues or projects will undoubtedly surface throughout the year. All
unknown issues will be addressed based on significance and/or importance, as time and
budgets allow.
MOTORIZED TRAILS AND RECREATION
The management of county recreational trails was assigned to the Forestry and Parks
Department in July 2013. Primarily, this involves the management/oversight of all state
funded motorized trails located on county and private land (also groom snowmobile trails
on federal land). To help accomplish this task, Bayfield County maintains agreements with
the Bayfield County Snowmobile Alliance and local ATV clubs (and USFS).
Table 5 displays the total miles and annual maintenance funds received from the State of
Wisconsin per trail type:
Table 5: Mileage and Funding For Trails Managed by Bayfield County
Trail Type Miles Rate/Mile Total
Snowmobile 437 $250 $109,250
ATV Summer 86.75 $600 $52,050
ATV Winter 168.15 $100 $16,815
UTV 86.75 $100 $8,675
Total 778.65 $186,790
In addition to the routine maintenance performed on these trails by the Alliance and local
clubs, below is a listing of anticipated Trails projects or issues that may be addressed in
2017:
1. Generate a recreational trail development and maintenance strategy, with an
emphasis on identifying critical connections and areas for new construction or
enhancement. This may require input from existing partners and user groups, as
well as the general public.
2. Re-establish roles and responsibilities with the BCSA, snowmobile clubs and ATV
45
clubs.
3. Update contracts with the BCSA and other clubs.
4. Continue to resolve numerous landowner disputes regarding land ownership and/or
trail location.
5. Continue to work, along with the County Tourism Department, on building a
supportive network of local chambers, business owners and community members
that will help in the financial and/or logistical support of the Bayfield County trail
networks
6. Maintain a database identifying each club and officers, as well as location and
mileage maintained for snowmobile and ATV trails.
7. Develop and maintain a database identifying the location and condition of all
bridges, culverts, gates and outbuildings on snowmobile and ATV trails.
8. Creating a maintenance/inspection schedule for #7.
9. Develop and maintain a database for all existing permits or easements allowing
snowmobile and ATV trails to occur on private land.
10. Develop and maintain a database that categorizes the importance of each trail to
the overall network/community i.e. high, medium, low. The database would help
ascertain the importance of future repair work. For example, a major repair on a
trail designated as low importance might not be a high priority.
11. Combine #’s 9 and 10 to determine where to focus obtaining future easements or
access permits.
12. Develop updated permit/easement form.
13. Pursue the concept of compensation to private landowners who allow recreational
trails on their land.
14. Potential land purchase to secure ATV and snowmobile trail access on Trail 7 in the
Town of Barnes.
15. Coordinate with the USFS on the recently approved grant to re-route a portion of
the snowmobile trail near Kimball Road.
16. Complete repair work on Trail 1 off Klemik Road.
17. Complete repair work on Trail 1 east of Swedlund Road, that was damaged from the
heavy July 2016 rain storm (FEMA project).
18. Complete repair work on Trail 31 north of 43 Road, that was also damaged from the
heavy July 2016 rain storm (also a FEMA project).
19. Coordinate with the Snowmobile Alliance and DNR on the implementation of the
newly established Snowmobile Electronic Reports System (SNARS), recently
developed by the state.
20. Complete the installation of the new privy at Trail 22/24 intersection. Privy has
been installed, but need to finish up the approach work.
21. Close out the installation of the new clearspan bridge on snowmobile/ATV Trail 3,
over the East Fork of the Flag River.
22. Re-grade and/or re-surface Trail 17 (Banana Belt Road) in Iron River.
23. Continue to work on funding a new trailhead shelter on Trail 3, near the
46
intersection of Flag Road and the Battleaxe.
24. Finalize plans for a bridge installation on Trail 63 within the Bibon Swamp State
Natural Area.
25. Finalize plans for a clearspan bridge over North Pike’s Creek on Trail 31/1 near
Compton Lane, or find a suitable re-route around the problem area. Working with
the Bayfield Regional Conservancy and Bayfield County Land and Water
Conservation to re-establish the natural stream channel and repair streambank bed.
26. Compile a list of beaver dam issues impacting trail infrastructure. Coordinate with
USDA APHIS Animal Control Services to eradicate the problem animals and
destroy associated dam structures.
The above listed items are known issues or projects that need attention in 2017. All or
most of the projects that will require significant repair work or new
construction/installation will be submitted to the State for potential funding.
Numerous unknown issues or projects will undoubtedly surface throughout the year. All
unknown issues will be addressed based on significance and/or importance, as time and
budgets allow.
Meet the Staff
The information listed above describes the general Departmental goals and objectives for
CY 2017. Below is a brief background history of Department and DNR staff employed to
accomplish those goals.
Administrator: Jason Bodine.
a. Experience: Forester with Bayfield County from 2000 to 2009.
Administrator from 2009 to present.
b. Highest Level of Education: Master of Science in Forestry from Michigan
Technological University.
c. Primary Role: administers and manages all aspects of the forestry, parks
and recreation programs. Directs day to day operations and all planning
efforts. Supervises all employees working within the Department.
Assistant Administrator: Steve Probst.
a. Experience: Forester with Bayfield County from 1999 to 2000. Assistant
Administrator from 2000 to present.
b. Highest Level of Education: Bachelor of Science in Forest Management
from UW Stevens Point.
c. Primary Role: assist the administrator in all facets of the forest
management program. Provides lead field role in all aspects of timber sale
administration.
d.
47
Forester: Mike Amman.
a. Experience: Forester with Bayfield County from 2003 to present.
b. Highest Level of Education: Bachelor of Science in Natural Resources from
UW Madison.
c. Primary Role(s): timber sale establishment, forest reconnaissance,
reforestation and regeneration monitoring and database management (GIS
and WisFIRS). Assist in other aspects of the forest management program.
Forester: Andrew O’Krueg.
a. Experience: Forester with Bayfield County from 2010 to present.
b. Highest Level of Education: Bachelor of Science in Forest Management
from UW Stevens Point.
c. Primary Roles(s): timber sale establishment, forest reconnaissance,
reforestation and regeneration monitoring and database management (GIS
and WisFIRS). Assist in other aspects of the forest management program.
Forester: Jeremiah Neitzel.
a. Experience: Forester with Bayfield County from 2011 to present.
b. Highest Level of Education: Bachelor of Science in Forest Management
from UW Stevens Point.
c. Primary Roles(s): timber sale establishment, forest reconnaissance,
reforestation and regeneration monitoring and database management (GIS
and WisFIRS). Assist in other aspects of the forest management program.
Forester: Jason Holmes.
a. Experience: Forester with Bayfield County from 2012 to present.
b. Highest Level of Education: Master of Science in Forestry from Michigan
Technological University.
c. Primary Roles(s): timber sale establishment, forest reconnaissance,
reforestation and regeneration monitoring and database management (GIS
and WisFIRS). Assist in other aspects of the forest management program.
Recreation Forester: Jenifer Bratsch.
a. Experience: Recreation Forester with Bayfield County from 2016 to
present.
b. Highest Level of Education: Master of Science in Physical Geography from
the University of Calgary.
c. Primary Roles(s): assist in the management of state funded ATV and
snowmobile programs, all recreation related activities on county forest
lands, including all designated non-motorized trails and yurts, and county
owned campgrounds and day use parks.
Forest Technician: John Mesko.
a. Experience: Forest Technician with Bayfield County from 2001 to present.
48
b. Highest Level of Education: employed in the general field of forest
management for over 30 years.
c. Primary Roles(s): heavy equipment operation, road and trail maintenance,
repair and construction, parks maintenance, assist in the timber sale
program, assist in the reforestation program.
Office Manager: Patricia Bruno.
a. Experience: Office manager with the Forestry and Parks Department from 2011 to
present. Employed in other departments within Bayfield County from 1994 to 2011.
b. Highest Level of Education: Vocational School Certificate.
c. Primary Roles(s): maintains accounts receivable and payable, prepares vouchers for
all expenditures, manages all accounts and paperwork associated with the timber
sale program, manages and prepares all financial records, statements and reports,
provides customer service.
WDNR – County Forest Liaison Forester: Joseph LeBouton.
a. Experience: WDNR - County Forest Liaison Forester from 2011 to present.
b. Highest Level of Education: PhD candidate in the Department of Forestry at
Michigan State University for five years where he studied links between forest
landscape composition, white-tailed deer densities and northern hardwood forests.
c. Primary Roles(s): coordinating the DNR’s contribution to Bayfield County Forest
management activities. The DNR provides the county with enough forest
management assistance annually to set up 25% of the sustainable harvest, perform
roughly 50% of the required forest reconnaissance updates, as well as contribute
to road maintenance, forest improvement activities, prescribed fire, and wildlife
habitat improvement projects.
Submitted by Jason Bodine, Forestry & Parks Administrator, December 31, 2016.
A motion was made by Silbert/Strand to approve the 2017 Forestry and Parks
Department Work Plan. A brief discussion took place, the motion carried.
10. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2017-09, 2016 Year End Budget
Amendments for the Forestry & Parks Department. Bodine went through the
Resolution. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Resolution, which reads as
follows:
WHEREAS, as per Wisconsin State Statute 28.11(9)(d), Bayfield County is
required to distribute 10% of net timber sale receipts to towns that contain county forest
lands; and
WHEREAS, the 2016 expense budget for the 10% net timber sale receipts due to
Towns (100-34-56125-50590) was $290,000.00; and
49
WHEREAS, the 2016 revenue budget for county forest stumpage (100-34-46811 &
100-34-46815) was $2,900,000.00; and
WHEREAS, the actual county forest timber sale revenues for CY 2016 was
$5,041,999.55; and
WHEREAS, the required 10% timber sale payment due to the towns totaled
$504,199.95; and
WHEREAS, the required 10% timber sale payment to the towns exceeded the
expense budget by $214,200.00; and
WHEREAS, through a combination of state and federal funds, the Department was
awarded a total of $56,516.15 for emergency snowmobile trail repairs; and
WHEREAS, the Department completed the repairs to both sections of snowmobile
trails in December 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Department is responsible for the management of the state
funded snowmobile trail program; and
WHEREAS, for the 2015-2016 season, expenses exceeded budget by $63,095.73;
and
WHEREAS, all of the overage was reimbursed by the state as part of the snowmobile
supplemental maintenance payment; and
WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds available in the 2016 county forest
stumpage revenue lines to offset the overage in the town payment; and
WHEREAS, the combination of state and federal funds completely offset the
overage related to the snowmobile trail maintenance and repairs; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of
Supervisors, meeting this 31st day of January, 2017 approve the following 2016 budget
amendments:
Increase 2016 10% Timber Sales Due Towns expense line:
100-34-56125-50590 by $214,200.00;
Increase 2016 Sale of Wood-CFL-Co Share revenue line:
100-34-46811 by $192,780.00;
Increase 2016 10% County Forestry-Towns revenue line:
100-34-46815 by $21,420.00;
Increase 2016 Snowmobile Trail Maintenance Grants expense line:
100-34-55442-50240 by $88,611.88;
Increase 2016 Miscellaneous Federal Grant expense line:
100-34-55446-50290 by $31,000.00.
50
Increase 2016 State Grant-Snowmobile Trails revenue line:
100-34-43572 by $88,611.88;
Increase 2016 Miscellaneous Federal Grant revenue line:
100-34-43260 by $31,000.00.
By Action of the
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman
A motion was made by Rondeau/Maki to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No.
2017-09, 2016 Year End Budget Amendments for the Forestry & Parks Department.
A roll call vote was taken as follows: Oswald-yes; Silbert-yes; Pocernich-yes;
Strand-yes; Williams-yes; Coughtry-yes; Miller-yes; Crandall-yes; Rondeau-yes;
Goodwin-yes via phone; Bussey-yes; Fickbohm-yes; Maki-yes. Total: 13; 13 yes, 0
no. The motion carried.
11. Report of the Bayfield County Planning & Zoning Committee Regarding 2
Parcels of Property owned by Jamie and Abigail Klema, Located in Section 7,
Township 48N, Range 4W, in the Town of Barksdale to be Changed from Residential-
One (R-1) to Agricultural-One (Ag-1) 2017. Schierman was present to explain the
Report. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Report, which reads as follows:
TO: The County Board of Supervisors of Bayfield County on the hearing of petitions
to amend the Bayfield County Zoning Ordinance.
The Planning and Zoning Committee of the Bayfield County Board of
Supervisors, having held a public hearing pursuant to Section 59.69(5)(e),
Wisconsin Statutes; notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and
having been duly informed of the facts pertinent to the following changes;
hereby recommends the following action on said petition:
The Zoning of Jamie & Abigail Klema:
Parcel 1 - a 23.0-acre parcel (ID# 45) (V. 1126 P. 262), that part of Government Lot Four
(4) lying West of the center line of the abandoned right-of-way of the Chicago, St Paul,
Minneapolis & Omaha Railroad, LESS Highway right of way;
and LESS
A parcel of land located in said Government Lot Four (4), described as follows: Starting at
the intersection of the North line of said Government Lot 4 and the center of State Trunk
Highway #13 (as now located); thence South along the center line of State Trunk Highway
#13, a distance of 409 feet; thence West on a line parallel with the North line of said
Government Lot 4, a distance of 450 feet to an iron pipe placed in the ground passing
through an iron pipe placed in the ground at a distance of 40 feet from the center line of
State Trunk Highway #13; thence North a distance of approximately 400 feet, more or
51
less, to the North line of said Government Lot 4, to an iron pipe placed in the ground;
thence East along the North line of said Government Lot 4 to the place of beginning.
And
Parcel 2 – a 29.0-acre parcel (ID# 47) (V. 1126 P. 262), located in part of the Southwest
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ SW ¼), LESS a parcel of land in Township 48
North, Range 4 West, Section 7, Government Lot 4 thereof, lying within the following
described traverse: Commencing at a point on the East-West Quarter line of said Section
7,2,337.28 feet S. 89°02'16" E., of the West Quarter Corner of said Section 7; thence S.
1°33'31" W., 2,065.42 feet to a point of a curve; thence Southwesterly on a 2°15' curve to
the right, 556.78 feet to beginning of traverse; thence N. 89°23'21" W., 200 feet; thence
N. 51°13'53" E., 309.10 feet; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said 2°15' curve right
to the point of beginning;
and LESS
A parcel in said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ SW ¼), described as
follows: Commencing at the intersection of the West line of said SW SW and the North
line of the right of way of the Town Road; thence East along said right of way of the Town
Road, a distance of 450 feet to the point of beginning; thence from said point of
beginning, North on a line parallel to the West line of said SW ¼ SW 1/4, a distance of
485 feet; thence West, parallel to the South line of said SW ¼ SW1/4, a distance of 450
feet, to the West line of said SW ¼ SW ¼; thence North along the West line of said SW
¼ SW 1/4 , a distance of 370 feet; thence East on a line parallel with the South line of
said SW ¼ SW ¼, a distance of 515 feet; thence South on a line parallel with the West
line of said SW ¼ SW ¼, a distance of 855 feet to the North line of the right of way of
the Town Road; thence West along the North right of way line of the Town Road, 65 feet
to the point of beginning;
and LESS
A parcel in said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ SW ¼), described
as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the West line of said SW ¼ SW ¼ and the
North right of way line of the Town Road; thence East along said right of way of the Town
Road, a distance of 450 feet; thence North parallel with the West fine of said SW ¼ SW
¼, a distance of 485 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said SW ¼ SW ¼, a
distance of 450 feet to the West line of said SW ¼ SW ¼, thence South along the West
line of said SW ¼ SW ¼, a distance of 485 feet to the point of beginning;
both parcels are in Section Seven (7), Township Forty-Eight (48) N, Range Four (4) W,
Town of Barksdale, Bayfield County, WI recommended to be changed from Residential-
One (R-1) to Agricultural-One (Ag-1).
The Bayfield County Planning and Zoning Committee recommendation is:
52
Be Approved
Be Approved with modification
Be Disapproved.
Date: November 17, 2016 and October 20, 2016 (tabled)
BAYFIELD COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMITTEE
_____________Absent______________ _______________________________
William Bussey Dennis Pocernich
________________________________ _________________________________
Brett Rondeau Jeff Silbert
________________________________
Fred Strand
A motion was made by Rondeau/Coughtry to receive and place on file the
Report of the Bayfield County Planning & Zoning Committee Regarding 2 Parcels of
Property owned by Jamie and Abigail Klema, located in Section 7, Township 48N,
Range 4W, in the Town of Barksdale to be Changed from Residential-One (R-1) to
Agricultural-One (Ag-1) 2017. The motion carried.
12. Bayfield County Ordinance No. 2017-01, Regarding 2 Parcels of
Property owned by Jamie and Abigail Klema, located in Section o7, Township 48N,
Range 4W, in the Town of Barksdale to be Changed from Residential-One (R-1) to
Agricultural-One (Ag-1) 2017.
The Bayfield County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows:
That the Bayfield County Zoning Ordinance, adopted June 1, 1976, be and the same,
is hereby amended as follows:
The Zoning of Jamie & Abigail Klema:
Parcel 1 - a 23.0-acre parcel (ID# 45) (V. 1126 P. 262), that part of Government Lot Four
(4) lying West of the center line of the abandoned right-of-way of the Chicago, St Paul,
Minneapolis & Omaha Railroad, LESS Highway right of way;
and LESS
A parcel of land located in said Government Lot Four (4), described as follows: Starting at
the intersection of the North line of said Government Lot 4 and the center of State Trunk
Highway #13 (as now located); thence South along the center line of State Trunk Highway
#13, a distance of 409 feet; thence West on a line parallel with the North line of said
Government Lot 4, a distance of 450 feet to an iron pipe placed in the ground passing
through an iron pipe placed in the ground at a distance of 40 feet from the center line of
State Trunk Highway #13; thence North a distance of approximately 400 feet, more or
53
less, to the North line of said Government Lot 4, to an iron pipe placed in the ground;
thence East along the North line of said Government Lot 4 to the place of beginning.
And
Parcel 2 – a 29.0-acre parcel (ID# 47) (V. 1126 P. 262), located in part of the Southwest
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ SW ¼), LESS a parcel of land in Township 48
North, Range 4 West, Section 7, Government Lot 4 thereof, lying within the following
described traverse: Commencing at a point on the East-West Quarter line of said Section
7,2,337.28 feet S. 89°02'16" E., of the West Quarter Corner of said Section 7; thence S.
1°33'31" W., 2,065.42 feet to a point of a curve; thence Southwesterly on a 2°15' curve to
the right, 556.78 feet to beginning of traverse; thence N. 89°23'21" W., 200 feet; thence
N. 51°13'53" E., 309.10 feet; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said 2°15' curve right
to the point of beginning;
and LESS
A parcel in said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ SW ¼), described as
follows: Commencing at the intersection of the West line of said SW SW and the North
line of the right of way of the Town Road; thence East along said right of way of the Town
Road, a distance of 450 feet to the point of beginning; thence from said point of
beginning, North on a line parallel to the West line of said SW ¼ SW 1/4, a distance of
485 feet; thence West, parallel to the South line of said SW ¼ SW1/4, a distance of 450
feet, to the West line of said SW ¼ SW ¼; thence North along the West line of said SW
¼ SW 1/4 , a distance of 370 feet; thence East on a line parallel with the South line of
said SW ¼ SW ¼, a distance of 515 feet; thence South on a line parallel with the West
line of said SW ¼ SW ¼, a distance of 855 feet to the North line of the right of way of
the Town Road; thence West along the North right of way line of the Town Road, 65 feet
to the point of beginning;
and LESS
A parcel in said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SW ¼ SW ¼), described
as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the West line of said SW ¼ SW ¼ and the
North right of way line of the Town Road; thence East along said right of way of the Town
Road, a distance of 450 feet; thence North parallel with the West fine of said SW ¼ SW
¼, a distance of 485 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said SW ¼ SW ¼, a
distance of 450 feet to the West line of said SW ¼ SW ¼, thence South along the West
line of said SW ¼ SW ¼, a distance of 485 feet to the point of beginning;
both parcels are in Section Seven (7), Township Forty-Eight (48) N, Range Four (4) W,
Town of Barksdale, Bayfield County, WI recommended to be changed from Residential-
One (R-1) to Agricultural-One (Ag-1).
The Bayfield County Board of Supervisors decision is: to be approved.
54
By Action of the
BAYFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Attested to by:
Dennis M. Pocernich, Bayfield County Chair
A motion was made by Rondeau/Strand to adopt Bayfield County Amendatory
Ordinance No. 2017-01, Regarding 2 Parcels of Property owned by Jamie and Abigail
Klema, located in Section o7, Township 48N, Range 4W, in the Town of Barksdale to
be Changed from Residential-One (R-1) to Agricultural-One (Ag-1) 2017. The motion
carried.
13. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2017-10, 2017 Highway Budget
Amendments. Toepfer was present to explain this Resolution. It was also noted that the
dollar amount has been changed from that of $200,000 to $225,000. The Board
dispensed with the reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows:
WHEREAS, the Bayfield County Highway Department is requesting to amend their
budget in the amount of $225,000 to facilitate the purchase of a replacement loader; and
WHEREAS, the existing loader has 6,000 hours, was purchased in 1987, and has a
current book value of $16,117; and
WHEREAS, a serious mechanical breakdown (reverse clutch failure) occurred in
December; and
WHEREAS, the estimated cost of repairs ($30,000) would exceed the value of the
existing loader and in addition, the loader needs four new tires at a cost of $5,000 each;
and
WHEREAS, a replacement loader was not planned to be purchased in the 2017
budget year; and
WHEREAS, there are sufficient carry over funds available from 2016 to cover the
cost of the replacement loader.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of
Supervisors assembled this 31st day of January 2017, does hereby approve an amendment
to the Highway Department Budget as follows:
Increase revenue account # 710-71-49301 by $225,000
Increase expense account # 710-71-53281-50810 by $225,000.
By Action of the
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman
A motion was made by Maki/Rondeau to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No.
2017-10, Regarding 2017 Highway Budget Amendments. Discussion took place. A roll
call vote was taken as follows: Silbert-yes; Pocernich-yes; Strand-yes; Williams-
55
yes; Coughtry-yes; Miller-yes; Crandall-yes; Rondeau-yes; Goodwin-yes via phone;
Bussey-yes; Fickbohm-yes; Maki-yes; Oswald-yes. Total: 13; 13 yes, 0 no. The
motion carried.
14. Bayfield County Resolution 2017-03, 2016 Budget Amendment
Authorizing Funds for Electrical Upgrades at the Bayfield County Fairgrounds.
Abeles-Allison explained that this has gone through both the Executive and Fair
Committees and they have approved the Resolution and are recommending it for full Board
approval. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows:
WHEREAS, the County Board maintains the County Fairgrounds in Iron River,
WI; and
WHEREAS, Bayfield County has a desire to upgrade the electrical services
throughout the grounds; and
WHEREAS, the Bayfield County Fair and Executive Committees have
discussed this topic and recommends its approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of
Supervisors assembled this 21st day of January, 2017 approves the following 2016
budget amendment:
Increase 2016 General Fund, Fund Balance Applied: 100-00-49301 by $8,406
Increase Transfer to CIP line item: 100-00-59430-50820 by $8,406
Increase Transfer from Other Funds Line Item: 430-71-49201 by $8,406
Increase Fair Capital Improvements Line Item: 430-23-57100-50820-100 by $8,406
By Action of the
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman
A motion was made by Crandall/Strand to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No.
2017-03, 2016 Budget Amendment Authorizing Funds for Electrical Upgrades at the
Bayfield County Fairgrounds. A roll call vote was taken as follows: Pocernich-yes;
Strand-yes; Williams-yes; Coughtry-yes; Miller-yes; Crandall-yes; Rondeau-yes;
Goodwin-yes via phone; Bussey-yes; Fickbohm-yes; Maki-yes; Oswald-yes; Silbert-
no. Total: 13; 13 yes, 0 no. The motion carried.
15. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2017-05, Request to Apply for Lakes
Protection Grant through WI DNR. Abeles-Allison explained that this Resolution is for
the approval to proceed with the grant. The Board dispensed with the reading of the
Resolution, which reads as follows:
56
WHEREAS, Bayfield County is interested in obtaining a cost-share grant from the
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for the purpose of creating a Hydrogeologic
Atlas and Interactive Map of Bayfield County; and
WHEREAS, Bayfield County has prepared an application for the Lakes Protection
Grant in the amount of $120,000 and is requesting DNR Lake Protection Grant assistance
in the amount of $50,000; and
WHEREAS, Bayfield County attests to the validity and veracity of the statements
and representations contained in the grant application; and
WHEREAS, a grant agreement is requested to carry out the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Bayfield County will meet the
financial obligations necessary to fully and satisfactorily complete the project and hereby
authorizes and empowers the following officials or employees to submit the following
documents to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for financial
assistance that may be available:
Task
Title of Authorized
Representative
Email address and Phone
Number
Sign and submit a grant application. Scott M. Galetka
Sgaletka@BayfieldCounty.org
715-373-6156
Enter into a grant agreement with
the DNR Scott M. Galetka
Sgaletka@BayfieldCounty.org
715-373-6156
Submit quarterly and/or final
reports to the DNR no later than
the date specified in the grant
agreement. Scott M. Galetka
Sgaletka@BayfieldCounty.org
715-373-6156
Submit reimbursement request(s)
to the DNR no later than the date
specified in the grant agreement Scott M. Galetka
Sgaletka@BayfieldCounty.org
715-373-6156
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that applicant will comply with all local, state and
federal rules, regulations and ordinances relating to this project and the cost-share
agreement.
By Action of the
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
Dennis M. Pocernich
A motion was made by Bussey/Fickbohm to adopt Bayfield County Resolution
No. 2017-05, Request to Apply for Lakes Protection Grant through WI DNR. The
motion carried.
57
16. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2017-06, Request to Amend the Bayfield
County Land & Water Conservation 2016 Budget. Abeles-Allison explained and the
Board dispensed with the reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows:
WHEREAS, the Bayfield County Land and Water Conservation Department requests
that their 2016 budget be amended as follows to reflect actual amounts through the grants,
cost-share and cooperative agreements; and
WHEREAS, amendments to the accounts listed below are necessary to reflect account
actuals versus projected amounts from 2015.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of
Supervisors assembled this 31st day of January, 2017, approves the following budget
amendments to reflect the grants, cost-share and cooperative agreements:
Decrease revenue account 100-28-43274-101 (Restore 703) by $2,119.99
Increase revenue account 100-28-43273-003 (Boat Washer) by $650.42
Increase revenue account 100-28-43580-008 (Weed Co-op) by $18,035.61
Decrease revenue account 100-28-43580-007 (Garlic Mustard) by $1,797.77
Decrease revenue account 100-28-43590-104 (CBCW LS) by $5,777.16
Increase revenue account 100-28-43590-100 (AIS #5) by $14,497.57
Decrease revenue account 100-28-43589 (Cost-Share) by $0.40
Decrease expense account 100-28-56103-50290 (Restore 703) by $2,119.99
Increase expense account 100-28-56102-50290 (Boat Washer) by $650.42
Increase expense account 100-28-56110-50290 (Weed Co-op) by $18,035.61
Decrease expense account 100-28-56144-50290 (Garlic Mustard) by $1,797.77
Decrease expense account 100-28-56131-50290 (CBCW LS) by $5,777.16
Increase expense account 100-28-56208-50290 (AIS #5) by $14,497.57
Decrease expense account 100-28-56101-50291 (Cost-Share) by $0.40
By Action of the
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
Dennis M. Pocernich
A motion was made by Bussey/Rondeau to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No.
2017-06, Request to Amend the Bayfield County Land & Water Conservation 2016
Budget. A roll call vote was taken as follows: Strand-yes; Williams-yes; Coughtry-
yes; Miller-yes; Crandall-yes; Rondeau-yes; Goodwin-yes via phone; Bussey-yes;
Fickbohm-yes; Maki-yes; Oswald-yes; Silbert-no; Pocernich-yes. Total: 13; 13
yes, 0 no. The motion carried.
17. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2017-07, Request to Approve 2017
Budget Amendment to the Wildlife Damage Program to Increase Bayfield County’s
Bear Relocation Contract Amount by $8,075. The Board dispensed with the reading of
the Resolution, which reads as follows:
58
WHEREAS, the Bayfield County Land and Water Conservation Department
requests that their 2017 budget be amended as follows to reflect actual amounts through
the grant; and
WHEREAS, amendments to the accounts listed below are necessary to reflect
account actuals versus projected amounts from 2016.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of
Supervisors assembled this 31st day of January, 2017, approves the following budget
amendments to reflect the grants, cost-share and cooperative agreements.
Increase revenue account 100-28-43596 (WDP) by $8,075.00
Increase expense account 100-28-56115-50290 (WDP) by $8,075.00
By Action of the
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
Dennis M. Pocernich
A motion was made by Miller/Coughtry to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No.
2017-07, Request to Approve 2017 Budget Amendment to the Wildlife Damage
Program to Increase Bayfield County’s Bear Relocation Contract Amount by $8,075.
A roll call vote was taken as follows: Williams-yes; Coughtry-yes; Miller-yes;
Crandall-yes; Rondeau-yes; Goodwin-yes via phone; Bussey-yes; Fickbohm-yes; Maki-
yes; Oswald-yes; Silbert-no; Pocernich-yes; Strand-yes. Total: 13; 13 yes, 0 no.
The motion carried.
18. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2017-08, Regarding Bremer Organization
Signature Form. Abeles-Allison reported that the Executive Committee has approved
this, however, it needs full Board approval. The Board dispensed with the reading of the
Resolution, which reads as follows:
BREMER
Wealth Management
ORGANIZATION RESOLUTION
Name of Organization: County of Bayfield, Wisconsin
I HEREBY CERTIFY TO Bremer Trust, National Association that at a meeting of the
Board of Directors/Trustees/partners of County of Bayfield, Wisconsin
On the 31st day of January, 2017, the following resolutions were duly adopted and are
now in full force and effect:
59
RESOLVED¸ that Bremer Trust, National Association is designated as a depository of this
organization and that funds of this organization deposited with Bremer Trust, National
Association are subject to withdrawal when:
X Written communication is delivered to Bremer Trust
___ Oral Communication is delivered to Bremer Trust
___ Either written communication OR oral communication
By any 3 of the following individuals:
Print Full Name Signature
Daniel R. Anderson, Treasurer Daniel R. Anderson
Scott S. Fibert, County Clerk Scott S. Fibert
Mark Abeles-Allison, Administrator Mark Abeles-Allison
Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman Dennis M. Pocernich
The Authorized disbursements should be made as follows:
1. By transfer to a Financial Institution account as evidenced by the attached
document (attach voided check or other evidence from financial institution).
2. By check made payable directly to the organization.
RESOLVED, that this direction authorizes the individuals listed below to establish the
investment objectives and strategies for the organization’s account. The direction of 3
individuals are necessary to authorize a strategy and it will be documented in a separate
writing.
Print Full Name Signature
Daniel R. Anderson, Treasurer Daniel R. Anderson
Scott S. Fibert, County Clerk Scott S. Fibert
Mark Abeles-Allison, Administrator Mark Abeles-Allison
Dennis M. Pocernich, Chairman Dennis M. Pocernich
RESOLVED, that Bremer Trust may accept direction from and transact business
with any of the above individuals on behalf of the organization.
RESOLVED, that the foregoing powers and authority will continue until written
notice of revocation has been delivered to Bremer Trust.
RESOLVED, that the Secretary/Trustee/Partner of this organization hereby is
authorized to certify to Bremer Trust, the foregoing resolutions and that the provisions,
therefore, are in conformity with the charter/by-laws/agreement of this organization.
I FURTHER CERTIFY, that there is no provision in the charter/by-
laws/agreement of said organization limiting the power of the Board of
Directors/Trustees/Partners to pass the foregoing resolutions and that the same are in
conformity with the provisions of said charter/by-laws/agreement. In addition, I
60
FURTHER CERTIFY that the above are the genuine signatures of the persons now holding
office of said organization as indicated opposite their respective signatures.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand on this 31st day of
January, 2017.
County of Bayfield, Wisconsin
By: Mark Abeles-Allison________________________________________
(Signature)
Its: Administrator
By Action of the
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
Dennis M. Pocernich
A motion was made by Rondeau/Oswald to adopt Bayfield County Resolution No.
2017-08, Regarding Bremer Organization Signature Form. The motion carried.
19. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Bayfield County Fraud Policy.
Abeles-Allison explained that this policy has been drafted as a response to a number of
examples of fraud that have taken place over the State in the past years. This shows how
to prevent and how to react to such cases. The purpose of the Policy is to deter fraud in
Bayfield County. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Policy, which reads as
follow:
INTRODUCTION
Bayfield County must protect the county organization, taxpayers, employees and assets
against financial risks, operational breaches and unethical activities. Management must
clearly communicate fraud prevention policies to internal and external customers, vendors
and employees.
The impact of misconduct and dishonesty includes:
Loss of public confidence
Financial Losses
Damage to the reputation of the county and its employees
Negative publicity
The cost of investigation
Loss of employees
Damaged relationships with contractors and suppliers
Litigation
Bayfield County is committed to the deterrence, detection and correction of misconduct
and dishonesty. The discovery, reporting and documentation of fraudulent acts provides a
sound foundation for the protection of innocent parties. Disciplinary action against
61
offenders including recover of assets, dismissal and where appropriate, referral to law
enforcement agencies shall be the norm.
POLICY STATEMENT
Bayfield County has adopted a policy regarding fraud. Employees shall not misuse County
assets for personal gain, or willfully misappropriate any Bayfield County asset. Evidence
supporting fraud, theft or embezzlement of Bayfield County assets and equipment may be
subject to suspension, termination, restitution and criminal charges. Any Bayfield County
employee who is aware of fraud being committed against the County by anyone shall report
such activity to their Department Head, the County Administrator’s Office or Sheriff’s
Office.
PROHIBITED ACTS
Fraud is defined as intentional deception, misappropriation of resources or
the manipulation of data to the advantage or disadvantage of a person or
entity.
Some examples of fraud include:
1. Authorizing or receiving compensation for goods not received or services not
performed.
2. Alteration or falsification of records.
3. Theft of misappropriation of cash or fixed assets.
4. Falsification of expenses and invoices.
5. Failure to account for monies collected.
6. Knowingly providing false information on job applications.
7. Authorizing or receiving compensation for hours not worked.
8. Embezzlement, bribery or conspiracy.
9. Obtaining or giving of any County property without going through proper
sale/purchase procedure.
REPORTING OF FRAUD
1. Employees shall read and understand this policy. Additionally, suspected or
known fraudulent acts by employees shall be reported to their respective
Department Head. If the employee has reason to believe that a Department
Head may be involved, the employee shall notify the County Administrator or
Sheriff’s Office directly.
2. Supervisors shall:
a. Communicate the provisions of this policy to all staff;
b. Take no action without consulting the Administrator;
c. Recommend appropriate disciplinary action when there is evidence of
wrong-doing; and
d. If suspension or termination is recommended, consult with the County
Administrator’s office.
62
3. Department Heads shall communicate any suspected or known fraudulent act to
the County Administrator or Sheriff’s Office. The Sheriff’s Office will notify
the County Administrator of criminal incidents and keep the County
Administrator abreast of the investigation.
4. Participants in a fraud investigation shall keep the details and results of the
investigation confidential.
5. Employees reporting an act of fraud; or assisting, testifying or participating in a
fraud investigation, acting in accordance with the equipment of this policy, shall
not be subject to any adverse employment action unless it is determined the
employee is culpable for such action and/or made an allegation knowing it was
false. Examples of adverse employment action include, but are not limited to,
discipline, suspension, threatening to discipline or suspend, coercion, acts of
intimidation and firing.
6. Complaints of fraud should in writing and can be anonymous. All fraud
accusations, whether in writing and signed or not, shall be documented and
shared with the County Administrator.
FALSE ALLEGATIONS
False allegations of suspected fraud with the intent to disrupt or cause harm to another
may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.
DETERRING FRAUD AND CORRUPTION
The County has established internal controls, policies and procedures in an effort to
deter, prevent and detect fraud and corruption. It is the responsibility of Department
Heads and the County Administrator to ensure that adequate controls are in place at all
times within their departments.
All new full-time employees are subject to background investigations including a criminal
background check(s).
Vendors, contractors, and suppliers may be subject to screening, including verification of
the individual or company’s status as a debarred part.
When necessary, contractual agreements with the County may contain a provision
prohibiting fraudulent or corruptive acts and will include information about reporting fraud
and corruption.
County employees will periodically receive fraud and corruption awareness training. New
employees will receive this policy as part of their training at orientation.
Annually, Department Heads will review internal fraud prevention policies and control
mechanisms and make any required updates to internal controls. These discussions shall
include:
Issuance of cash receipts in all situations;
Tracking of petty cash;
Tracking of all County bank accounts through the Treasurer’s Office;
63
Separation of duties;
Credit card procedures;
Counter signing of checks, at least two signatures on all checks;
Mandatory vacations;
Annual reporting of auditor findings to the County Executive Committee;
Separation of cash and accounting records at all times.
CORRECTIVE ACTION
Determination regarding action against an employee, vendor, recipient or other person
found to have committed fraud or corruption will be made by the County Administrator
and Personnel Committee with notification to the appropriate law enforcement entity as
required.
Offenders at all levels of the County will be treated equally regardless of their position or
years of service with the County. Determinations will be made based on a finding of facts
in each case, actual or potential damage to the County, cooperation by the offender and
legal requirements.
Depending on the seriousness of the offense and the facts of each individual case, action
against an employee can range from written reprimand to legal action-either civil or
criminal in addition to termination. In all cases, involving monetary losses to the County,
the County will pursue recovery of losses.
A motion was made by Goodwin, via phone/Bussey to adopt the Bayfield County
Fraud Policy. The motion carried.
20. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Tribal County Lands
Memorandum of Understanding. Abeles-Allison stated that this came from the Bayfield
County Tribal Relations Committee. Supervisor Goodwin, via phone, explained that the
Memorandum is a tool basically renew the Memorandum of Understanding entered into in
2014 and is discussion purposes only. Both Jeff and I are of the same opinion that this is
for sharing ideas and discussion. Discussion then turned to the possible land exchange.
Goodwin again stated that this is for discussion purposes only and that any final decisions
to be made would be made to the 13 members of the Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
and that he is sharing this same belief with the Town of Russell Board. This Memorandum
does not obligate anyone to do anything, it is just for discussion. The parties do not want
to see public land being turned over to either party and not having it remain open to the
general public. The Board dispensed with the reading of the Memorandum which reads as
follows:
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Memorandum of Understanding entered into this _____ day of ______, 2016 by and
between the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of 88385 Pike Road,
Bayfield, Wisconsin, 54814, a federally recognized Indian Tribe exercising powers of self-
government (hereinafter “Red Cliff Tribe”) and County of Bayfield of Post Office Box 878,
64
117 East Fifth Street, Washburn, Wisconsin, 54891, a body corporate, organized under
the laws of the State of Wisconsin (hereinafter “Bayfield County”).
RECITALS
Whereas, the Red Cliff Tribe and its reservation exists within the geographic boundaries
of Bayfield County, and there is a historic working relationship between Bayfield County
and the Red Cliff Tribe that recognizes the governmental authority of one another; and
Whereas, the Red Cliff Tribe and Bayfield County have strived to work together
cooperatively, have sought to avoid conflicts wherever possible, and have sought mutual
solutions to common issues that benefit the citizens of the Red Cliff Tribe and Bayfield
County alike; and
Whereas, the Red Cliff Tribe and Bayfield County held their first ever joint full County
Board and Tribal Council meeting in December of 2015; and
Whereas, the Red Cliff Tribe’s reservation land base consists of approximately 14,000
acres, about only 7,000 of which are actually held by the Red Cliff Tribe or its members;
and
Whereas, the Red Cliff Tribe originally possessed all of its reservation land base as part
of the original reservation boundary, held by the United States in trust for the Red Cliff
Tribe; and
Whereas, since establishment of the original reservation boundary in 1854, the Red Cliff
Tribe has lost a majority of its lands; and
Whereas, recovery and retention of Red Cliff Tribal lands is vitally important to the
economic and cultural well-being of the Red Cliff Tribe and its members; and
Whereas, in 2000 the Red Cliff Tribe initiated the Tribal Land Recovery Project for the
purpose of returning lands within the original reservation boundary back to tribal and/or
federal ownership and control; and
Whereas, Bayfield County recognizes the central importance of land, its underlying role in
the Red Cliff community, and supports the Red Cliff Tribe’s efforts; and
Whereas, Bayfield County owns approximately 1400 acres of land on the Red Cliff
Reservation, the majority of which is in County Forest Law Designation; and
Whereas, Bayfield County relies on County Forest proceeds to reduce tax payer
obligations; and
Whereas, all Bayfield County lands are open to the public and have offered recreation and
hunting opportunities to residents and visitors alike over the decades; and
Whereas, repatriated tribal lands may not necessarily include open public access and no
presumption is made as to the future use of repatriated tribal lands; and
65
Whereas, Bayfield County is subject to exercising reasonable business judgment in the
conveyance of real estate; and
Whereas, the Red Cliff Tribe is interested in preserving and enhancing Red Cliff Tribal
lands for generations to come;
Whereas, one of the County Tribal Relations Committee goals is to facilitate the
repatriation of lands to the Red Cliff Tribe while fostering mutual respect and
cooperation;
Now therefore be it resolved, that the parties hereby agree as follows on the following
three items:
A. Bayfield County and Red Cliff pledge to work with each other to seek a suitable
land exchange, trade or other conveyance of lands.
B. Historically parcels have reverted to Bayfield County as a result of tax
delinquency. Bayfield County and Red Cliff agree that they will maintain close contact
with each other regarding tax delinquent properties on the Red Cliff Reservation.
If a parcel within the reservation boundaries is taken back by Bayfield County through tax
foreclosure, the County will make contact with Red Cliff to ensure the Tribe is aware.
Furthermore, Bayfield County will not offer the parcel for sale until six months (180 days)
have elapsed from the time of taking title by tax foreclosure. During this 180-day term,
Red Cliff Tribe and Bayfield County may engage in good faith negotiations over the terms
and conditions upon which such parcel(s) may be returned to tribal/federal ownership.
C. The Parties hereby agree to establish a Tribal Lands Working Initiative to further
the intent of this MOU. At each Tribal County Relations meeting a standing agenda item
entitled, Tribal Lands Working Initiative shall be included to discuss Bayfield County-
owned parcels or parcels that may soon become owned by Bayfield County, within the Red
Cliff reservation boundary and options for transfer that may benefit the Red Cliff Tribe.
The parties hereby pledge that they will strive to find mutually satisfactory solutions that
take into account both the needs and interests of Bayfield County residents as well as the
long term land goals of the Red Cliff Tribe as it relates to Bayfield County owned land in
the Red Cliff reservation, including but not necessarily limited to the following:
1. Participation in the Tribal Lands Working Initiative; and
2. Negotiation over the terms and conditions upon which lands identified may
be exchanged reflecting Tribal / County interests.
ADDITIONAL TERMS
1. This Memorandum of Understanding shall continue in force and effect for an
initial term of five (5) years, and shall automatically renew for an additional
five (5) year term, unless thirty (30) day advance notice of termination is
provided by either party.
66
2. This MOU is not intended to alter the existing authority, rights, or claims of
any party, and parties acknowledge legal limitations under Wisconsin Statute
75.69 or other statutes that may apply.
3. This instrument contains the entire agreement between the parties, and no
statements, promises or inducements made by either party or agent of
either party that are not contained in this written contract shall be valid or
binding; this contract may not be enlarged, modified or altered except in
writing, signed by the parties, and endorsed on this agreement.
Dated this ____ day of ________, 2016.
BY THE PARTIES:
__________________________ ______________________________
Bryan Bainbridge Dennis Pocernich
Tribal Chairman Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Bayfield County
Chippewa Indians
A motion was made by Silbert/Coughtry to approve the Tribal/County Lands
Memorandum of Understanding, recognizing that this is just a tool format for
discussions. A lengthy discussion took place. The motion carried with 2 oppositions.
21. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2017-04, Indigenous Peoples Day.
Abeles-Allison explained the purpose of this Resolution. The Board dispensed with the
reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows:
WHEREAS, the Bayfield County Board recognizes that the Indigenous people of
Bayfield County and Chequamegon Bay have occupied these lands since time immemorial;
and
WHEREAS, the Chippewa tribes ceded roughly the northern third of Wisconsin via
treaties [1837,1842,1854] but retained their sovereignty and treaty rights to hunt, gather
and fish; and
WHEREAS, the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa are a critical component
to our region’s identify and economy, including the tourism and employment of Bayfield
County; and
WHEREAS, the cultural, spiritual and environmental values of the Chippewa people
enhance our communities; and
WHEREAS, Chippewa Veterans have served and protected this country with
courage and honor in the armed forces; and
WHEREAS, the Bayfield County Board of County Supervisors endeavors to build
bridges of trust, respect and mutual cooperation with the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior
Chippewa; and
67
WHEREAS, the contributions, challenges and sacrifices of Indigenous people and
their communities are often not fully recognized or appreciated; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of
Supervisors shall annually recognize the second Monday in October as Indigenous Peoples
Day; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board encourages other
organizations, businesses and public entities to recognize Indigenous Peoples Day as well.
By Action of the
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
Dennis M. Pocernich
A motion was made by Coughtry/Oswald to adopt Bayfield County Resolution
No. 2017-04, Indigenous Peoples Day. A very lengthy discussion took place on how
Bayfield County is working and striving for mutual respect and cooperation. Silbert stated
that he prepared this document which is meant in a positive manner for respect,
contributions, and sacrifices the Tribe has made. This was discussed at the Executive
Committee. This is a small step to give proper recognition to our neighbors and allow
further discussions with our Memorandum of Understanding in the future. Bayfield
County is not the first to put such a document into place, it is being done all over the
United States. The City of Ashland has passed such a document. The day stated for
Indigenous People Day is Columbus Day. Supervisor Goodwin interjected that discussion of
an alternative to Columbus Day has taken place. Goodwin stated that the celebration of
this day is about building good, sound, relationships. By building a relationship, we
acknowledge that we are helping the Native American community out of victimization to
self-determination. If we acknowledge this it won’t deter from Columbus Day, but will
help to acknowledge a historical fact. This would be a recognition that could co-exist with
Columbus Day. This is a good idea for the County. We can acknowledge Indigenous
Peoples Day in the spirit of working together and living together. That is the idea behind
Resolution. Further discussion took place took place amongst the Board. Goodwin stated
that it is exciting to live in a county with a sovereign nation. Supervisor wanted to go on
record that he agreed with that idea. Supervisor Silbert stated that this Resolution isn’t
blaming anyone or finger pointing in any way, it is meant to keep a positive manner, and to
take it for what is and read nothing further into it. After further discussion, a roll call
vote was asked for as follows: Coughtry-yes; Miller-no; Crandall-yes; Rondeau-no;
Goodwin-yes via phone; Bussey-yes; Fickbohm-yes; Maki-no; Oswald-yes; Silbert-
yes; Pocernich-yes; Strand-yes; Williams-no; Total: 13; 9 yes, 4 no. The motion
carried.
Supervisor Rondeau left at 8:10 p.m.
68
22. Bayfield County Resolution No. 2017-11, Regarding Security and Office
Space Study. Abeles-Allison reported that we received 4 proposals. The BKV Group has
worked on over 50 courthouses and he felt they were the best qualified to do the work for
Bayfield County. They were the most comprehensive, most experienced firm in this field
and was the most inexpensive. The Board had a copy of their RFP to review. The
Resolution before you authorizes an additional $3,600.00 from the Contingency Fund to
address the $13,600 cost over the budgeted amount of $10,000. The firm will have 60
days in which to complete their study to have back to us in time for the April County Board
meeting. The Board dispensed with reading of the Resolution, which reads as follows:
WHEREAS, Bayfield County recognizes the need for a secure and efficient
operation for employees and citizens; and
WHEREAS, multiple departments have raised questions about county office
security; and
WHEREAS, state agencies that partner with county departments have raised
questions about county security practices; and
WHEREAS, an office space plan for the next 15 years would allow the county to
plan maintenance and replacement projects more accurately; and
WHEREAS, the county budgeted $10,000 for an office space and security study in
2017; and
WHEREAS, four responses to the County RFP for the Office Space and Security
Study were received.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Bayfield County Board of
Supervisors assembled this 31st day of January, 2017, does hereby authorize the County
Administrator to proceed with awarding the space and security study to the firm of BKV
for the amount of $13,600; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Bayfield County will allocate $3600 from the
contingency budget to make up the difference between the budgeted figure and actual
contract amount for the study.
Decrease the 2017 General Fund Contingency expense line item
100-00-51410-5000 by $3,600.
Increase 2017 General Fund Transfer to CIP Fund expense account:
100-00-59430-50820 by $3,600
Increase the 2017 Capital Improvement Fund Transfer from Other Funds
430-70-49201 by $3,600.
Increase the 2017 Capital Improvement Fund Security/Space Study
430-01-57100-50820 by $3,600.
69
By Action of the
Bayfield County Board of Supervisors
Dennis M. Pocernich
A motion was made by Goodwin/Crandall to adopt Bayfield County Resolution
NO. 2017-11, Regarding Security and Office Space Study. A roll call vote took
place as follows: Miller-no; Crandall-yes; Rondeau-absent; Goodwin-yes via phone;
Bussey-yes; Fickbohm-yes; Maki-no; Oswald-yes; Silbert-yes; Pocernich-yes;
Strand-yes; Williams-yes; Coughtry-yes. Total: 13; 10 yes, 2 no’s, 1 absent.
The motion carried.
23. Discussion and Possible Action Regarding Northern Lights Unemployment
Reserve, Line of Credit and Notes. Abeles-Allison informed the Board that the funding
that Northern Lights was trying to obtain for refinancing did not go as planned.
Northern Lights is asking for a new, 30-day extension. It may take another 4 months for
the refinancing to work out. Supervisor Maki is on the Northern Lights Board
representing Bayfield County and spoke how the Northern Lights didn’t give out the
budget or the finance report until the meeting date. He felt they aren’t wanting to give
out the reports as questions will be asked. Maki would like to know what is happening.
Northern Lights is asking that Bayfield County extend their line of credit, Worker’s
Compensation and the $150,000 note again as they are not able to meet their commitment
or obligations at this point. Discussion took place regarding all the topics and a motion
was made by Bussey/Crandall to secure a line of credit and notes for Northern Lights
until the April 18, 2017 County Board Meeting. Discussion took place on what would
happen if we didn’t extend, which would be that we ultimately would be on the hook for the
4.2 million dollars. There are potential problems. Maki asked if perhaps a few more Board
members could attend their board meetings. Abeles-Allison was asked if he could let our
Board members know when Northern Lights Board meetings are going to be held. Board
members felt news was very disappointing after all of the assurances given to us last
August. The Northern Lights Board needs to come to a County Board meeting to discuss
their situation. A roll call vote was taken as follows: Crandall-yes; Rondeau-absent;
Goodwin-no via phone; Bussey-yes; Fickbohm-yes; Maki-yes; Oswald-yes; Silbert-
yes; Pocernich-yes; Strand-yes; Williams-yes; Coughtry-yes; Miller-yes. Total:
13; 11 yes, 1 no, 1 absent. The motion carried.
24. A motion was made by Miller/Crandall move into Executive Session
pursuant to §19.85(1) (c), considering employment, promotion, compensation or
performance valuation data of any public employee over which the governmental body
has jurisdiction or exercises responsibility. The motion carried and Supervisor
Goodwin was disconnected at this time.
A motion was made by Miller/Crandall to move out of Executive/Closed Session.
The motion carried.
70
24. Administrator’s Report:
a) Future County Board Meeting Dates: Meeting dates for the upcoming
months are as follows: Feb. 28th; Mar. 28th; April 18th 4:00 discussed.
b) 2018 County Budget Survey Topic Requests. The Board was asked to put
their ideas together and give them to Abeles-Allison or Kane. The survey will
go out in April.
c) Superior Days. The dates for Superior Days are February 21 – 22. Topics
for this were discussed relating to the PILT issue, sales tax for roads,
shoreline zoning, and local control for water quality.
25. Supervisors’ Reports:
a) WCA Ambassador Report – Supervisor Strand reported that in 2010 the
Wisconsin Counties Association began the County Ambassador Program (CAP). The goal of
the program is to engage county officials in the Association’s efforts to educate
lawmakers on issues important to counties through direct dialogue with Legislators. His
meeting with Beth Meyers and her aid included Keith Kessler, Douglas County Emergency
Director, and Kathy Schutte and Charlie Ortman, Ashland County Board. Carol Buck,
Washburn County Emergency Director, joined us for the meeting with Janet Bewley and
her aid.
The issues/information that were presented are:
Child Welfare Services: requested a 10% ($6.8M) increase in funding. There has
not been an increase in funding since 2009, and case load work has significantly
increased, largely due to increase in drug use cases.
Land Conservation funding: restore funding level to previously established base;
restore $2.2M to the base budget.
County Veterans Service Officer: return state funding back to block grant funding.
911: modernize by the State taking the lead by issuing a Statewide RFP, increase
funding by $12.5M.
We were well received. Both Meyers and Bewley are supportive of these requests
and pledged to work within their party and with the other party to achieve our requests.
Both thought they could achieve at least some support for these issues.
There being no further business to come before the Bayfield County Board of
Supervisors, Chairman Pocernich adjourned the meeting at 8:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Scott S. Fibert,
Bayfield County Clerk, SSF/dmb