HomeMy WebLinkAboutNorthern Lights Special Study Committee - Agenda - 7/24/2023
Bayfield County Administrator
117 E 5th Street, PO Box 878, Washburn, WI 54891
Ph: 715-373-6181 Fx: 715-373-6153
www.Bayfieldcounty.wi.gov
Mark Abeles-Allison, County Administrator
Kristine Kavajecz, Human Resource Director
Paige Terry, Clerk III
NORTHERN LIGHTS / BAYFIELD COUNTY
SPECIAL STUDY COMMITTEE
Ellen Avol-Law Mark Ehlers, Vice-Chair
Jeff Silbert Mary Dougherty, Chair
*** AGENDA ***
Dear Committee Members:
This letter is written to inform you of the Bayfield County Executive Committee Meeting
scheduled for 1:30pm Monday, July 24, 2023 in the Emergency Operations Center (EOC).
This meeting will be held in-person and remotely. Supervisors and the public will be able to
participate in the Meeting in person or via voice either by using the internet link or phone
number below.
Microsoft Teams meeting
Join on your computer, mobile app or room device
Click here to join the meeting
Meeting ID: 249 254 454 778
Passcode: R9kPNX
Download Teams | Join on the web
Or call in (audio only)
+1 715-318-2087,,884061664# United States, Eau Claire
Phone Conference ID: 884 061 664#
Find a local number | Reset PIN
Learn More | Meeting options
Contact Bayfield County at 715-373-6181 if you have access questions or email
Mark.Abeles-Allison@bayfieldcounty.wi.gov if during the meeting.
Any person wishing to attend who, because of a disability, requires special accommodations,
should contact the County Clerk’s office at 715-373-6100, at least 24 hours before the scheduled
meeting time, so appropriate arrangements can be made.
Notice is hereby given that in the event the standing committee does not have a quorum the
County Board Chair or Vice Chair may act as an ex officio member (County ordinance, Chapter
3, section 2-3-1 (c)). Notice is hereby given that a majority of the Bayfield County Board may be
present at the meeting to gather information about a subject over which they have decision-
making responsibility. This constitutes a meeting of the Bayfield County Board pursuant to State
ex rel. Badke v. Greendale Village Bd., 173 Wis. 2d 553, 494 N.W.2d 408(1993), and must be
noticed as such, although the County Board will not take any formal action at this meeting.
1) Call to Order and Introductions
2) Reading of Purpose Statement
Conduct a comprehensive assessment of the short-term and long-term success strategies for
the Northern Lights facility, including a market overview and a review of the non-profit
model currently in place. The assessment will also provide a clear delineation of the roles
and responsibilities for future Bayfield County and Northern Lights Board collaboration.
This work will be completed in time for the Bayfield County 2024 budget considerations
beginning August 20, 2023.
3) Discussion and Possible Action, Minutes from July 12, 2023
4) Public Comment: Limited to 3 minutes per person, 15 minutes maximum
5) Purpose Statement
a) Short Term Success Strategy
b) Long Term Success Strategy
c) Capital Improvement Listing
d) Market Study Overview
e) Non-profit model Review
6) Suggestions from Collaboration Committee
7) Discussion Regarding 2023 Financial Update
8) Northern Lights Board Development
9) Next Meeting Topics
10) Next Meeting Dates:
• Monday, August 7 at 1:30 p.m. (EOC)
• Monday, August 21 at 1:30 p.m. (EOC)
11) Adjourn
NORTHERN LIGHTS MEETING, NARRATIVE, JULY 24
Item 5: Over the past several meetings we have discussed components of the
Purpose statement. I wanted to summarize / restate here (Mark’s perspective
only) to continue the discussion. This needs your review and input
a. Short Term Success: (12-24 months)
• Financial stability. Defined as 1 month of cash in the bank. $500,000
• Stable board and management. Clear understanding of roles
• Continued focus on infrastructure repair and replacement.
b. Long Term Success: 2-5 years
• Financial Stability. 1 month of cash in the bank
• Stable board and management
• Infrastructure up to date
c. Capital Improvements:
• Short term: $358k
o Still need cooler quote
o Firm up estimates
• Long term: $330k
o Does not include roof
See some detail below
d. Market Assessment Overview:
• Independent Living:
o None in BC now
o Need for 18-25 units in BC
• Assisted Living and Memory Care
o Need for 15 Assisted Living (age eligible) beds
o Need for 9 market rate assisted living beds
o Increase CBRF by 9 and add 6 more for those qualifying for Family
Care.
e. Non Profit Model The chart below was provided by Leading Age.
• Non-profits represent 27% of licensed nursing homes.
• Government represents: 15%, (12% are counties)
Largest categories are:
• For Profit: 33%
• Limited Liability: 24%
In summary: Our non-profit / county model is common in Wisconsin.
Item 6: The Collaboration group met once since the last Committee meeting. The
attached summary is a listing of topics discussed. This list is not prioritized.
Please review.
Possible budget concepts for 2024.
1. Establish performance benchmarks for Mgt Team
a. 95% occupancy
b. 100% beds in pay status
c. Financial goal met.
i. $200,000 cash on April 1
ii. $300,000 cash on July 1
iii. $400,000 cash on Sept 1
iv. $500,000 cash on Jan 1, 2025
2. Waive Debt Service ($20k month) based on goal accomplishment.
3. NL Team compensation based on benchmark success.
1
Minutes of the
Northern Lights / Bayfield County Special Study Committee Meeting
1:30pm, July 12, 2023
Meeting was held Remotely through Microsoft Teams and in person in the Bayfield County
Emergency Operations Center, Washburn, WI
Members Present: Jeff Silbert, Mark Ehlers, Mary Dougherty, Ellen Avol-Law
Members Excused:
Others Present: Mark Abeles-Allison-County Administrator, Paige Terry-Clerk III, Carrie
Linder-Bayfield County Human Services Aging & Disability Services Manager, Kellie
Pederson-UW Extension Community Development Educator, Kim Mattson-Bayfield County
Accountant, Michelle Stouffer-Acting Northern Lights Administrator, Brian Spielman-Former
Owner of Aspen Acres, Autumn Koleski-Northern Lights Human Resources Director, Rene
Eastman-Vice President of Financial and Regulatory Services for Leading Age Wisconsin
Called to order at 1:37 p.m. by Committee Chair, Mary Dougherty
Introduction and Welcome Remarks: Introductions were made.
Purpose Statement Review: Abeles-Allison stated that the purpose statement was reviewed and
rewritten to include a more positive note at the end per Silbert’s request. Dougherty read the
purpose statement to the committee. The committee agreed on the purpose statement.
Minutes from June 19, 2023: Linder suggested that the sentence at the top of page three of the
minutes, “Dougherty raised the question of moving the Bayfield County Health Department to
the nursing home as a possible option” be changed to read “the Bayfield County Human Services
Aging and Disability unit.” Motion by Ehlers, seconded by Avol-Law to approve the minutes for
the June 19, 2023 Northern Lights / Bayfield County Special Study Committee Meeting as
amended. Motion carried.
1:42 p.m. – Chairwoman Dougherty moved Guest Speaker, Brian Spielman up on the agenda to
accommodate his time.
Guest Speaker Brian Spielman: Brian Spielman, former owner of Aspen Acres in Hayward,
gave a history of the facility to the committee. Abeles-Allison asked what actions the facility
would take if an individual was unable to pay. Spielman explained that the family of the resident,
or resident themselves, would be directed to connect with the local ADRC to assist with applying
for other funds. Ehlers questioned how close the facility was to getting to their private pay rate
by using Inclusa. Spielman stated there was a 40% difference. Silbert asked if the facility had
any skilled nursing beds. Spielman replied no and explained that the facility is categorized below
a skilled nursing facility. Abeles-Allison questioned if the facility had an interaction with the
local government. Spielman answered that the facility did not often interact with the local
government but did interact more with the Department of Health during the COVID-19
pandemic. Pederson asked if another facility in community was available as a skilled nursing
2
facility. Spielman stated that Waters Edge was a skilled nursing facility that is connected to the
Hayward Area Memorial Hospital and is operated by the hospital. Abeles-Allison asked
Spielman why he sold the facility, who the facility was sold to, and if the level of care has been
maintained at the facility since being sold. Spielman stated that his focus was shifting primarily
towards family and the business was functioning exceptionally well, so they received an offer to
buy the facility at an opportune time. Spielman reviewed the staffing breakdown of the facility.
Silbert asked about costs savings available in the market. Spielman suggested MCO negotiations.
Dougherty asked if Spielman had any industry trend recommendations that Northern Lights
should be looking at. Spielman replied that establishing appropriate rates is key in the success of
the facility. Linder asked for more specifics regarding the dementia care numbers for the facility.
Spielman reviewed the history of the memory care services in the facility. Silbert asked about the
construction aspects of the building that led to its success. Spielman gave a rundown on the
physical layout of Aspen Acres and stated that he would build a second building in the similar
layout as Aspen Acres if they decided to build again.
2023 Financial Update: Ehlers reported that Northern Lights has received the money from the
IRS for an employee retention credit in the amount of $447, 000. Northern Lights intends to use
the funds to pay off a line of credit and allocate $142,068 to accounts payable. The facility will
be paying off most of a boiler repair that was done, and the new phone system was already paid
although Ehlers was unaware that the county had already allocated to pay for the new system.
County funds that were designated to pay for the new phone system will be reallocated towards
paying off the boiler repair. Payroll has gone up because CNAs have been hired along with an
individual to help with laundry. Staff is anticipating an approximate $300,000 shortfall as the
funds being received are one-time use funds. Ehlers informed the committee that Northern Lights
has still not received the funds from the State of Wisconsin. Discussion took place regarding
funding sources available to Northern Lights.
Pederson recommended researching the topic of diversifying the facility’s funding sources with
the use of grants and researching the financial sustainable mix of public to private pay clients.
Dougherty suggested the committee investigate a mix of public and private pay residents.
Public Comment: None.
Northern Lights Market Assessment: The committee reviewed the market assessment. There
was general consensus that the facility should anticipate a greater demand for nursing home
services and the number of available skilled workers will grow smaller.
County Collaboration Options: Dougherty stated that the committee may explore two routes
for county collaboration, short-term immediate satisfaction or long-term collaborations, but the
committee should focus on one route as there is not enough time to explore both. The committee
discussed both options. The following collaboration options were discussed:
• Northern Lights Snow Removal – Bayfield County maintenance staff assisting with
removing snow from the Northern Lights property.
• Bayfield County IT Assistance for Northern Lights – Merging the Bayfield County and
Northern Lights IT systems.
3
• Bayfield County Meals on Wheels Program Assistance – Using the Nursing Home
kitchen for preparing meals for the program.
Linder informed the committee that the Human Services Aging and Disability Section is looking
at expanding to accommodate more staff and positions but stated that the courthouse space is
becoming limited and does not offer the space necessary for the section’s needs. The committee
discussed the potential for moving the Bayfield County Aging and Disability section to the
nursing home along with the possibility of renovating space in the nursing home’s lower level to
accommodate more assisted living residents.
Dougherty recommended not pursuing utilizing Bayfield County Maintenance staff for snow
removal or merging IT systems with the county as collaboration options because the costs would
be too great to the nursing home and the county staff would be stretched too thin. The committee
agreed.
The committee was tasked with creating a list of collaboration options to bring forward to the
next meeting.
Board Retreat, Management / Board Relations: Dougherty reminded the committee that the
topic was mentioned at the previous meeting that the roles between Northern Lights staff and
board members has become blurred and questioned if there are actions that can be taken to
clearly separate the two bodies. The committee asked if resources were available to educate the
board members on their roles. Pederson stated that UW Extension has plenty of resources that
could be used to educate the board. Silbert asked if Pederson would be able to provide education
materials. Pederson replied yes.
Next Meeting Topics: The committee discussed the following topics:
• Collaboration Options
• Northern Lights Board Development
Next Meeting Dates:
• Monday, July 24, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. (EOC)
• Monday, August 7, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. (EOC)
• Monday, August 21, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. (EOC)
Meeting adjourned at 3:12 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by Paige Terry.
Brainstorming Session on Opportunities to Improve Northern Lights Financial Situation
Finances
1. Bayfield County could Bond (issue debt) for Capital Improvements/Deferred
Maintenance
2. Bayfield County could Budget to address Northern Lights annual budgetary gap,
a. Pay $240k a year.
b. Reduce Debt Payment by $240k.
3. Northern Lights could capitalize on unused space by renting it out to outside entity:
approximately 5,000sq/ft might generate $5,000-$15,000/month, ie: PT business.
4. Northern Lights could provide opportunity for current PT provider to rent unused wing
and provide services to greater community. Minimal financial gain.
5. BC Senior meal prep contracts could involve Northern Lights:
a. Approximate Existing Contracts:
i. Washburn, $55k
ii. Ashland: $75k
6. ADRC could co-locate in unused wing of Northern Lights, this
a. Would concentrate senior services in one accessible campus.
b. Would increase efficacy of ADRC’s service delivery by providing additional
outreach space and improved office spaces.
c. Potential gains in service provision might be realized in both organizations with
co-location (e.g. ease of Medicaid applications)
d. ADRC and Northern Lights staff see as viable.
e. Estimated cost to relocate ADRC staff, office, tech, phones, furniture, etc:
$250,000.
f. Relocation could offset a portion of the funds Northern Lights pays to Bayfield
County in Debt service.
7. Current system of Bayfield County Board members serving on Northern Lights Board in
ex-officio capacity is working well and should continue.
a. Provides essential connectivity between County and Northern Lights
b. Concerns voiced with additional liability for County if County Board members
become voting members.
8. County absorption of Northern Lights
a. No gains were identified from this course of action.
9. Administrative merger between Bayfield County with Northern Lights
a. No net gains were identified from this course of action.
b. Northern Lights HR is complex and very specific to its operations; more
complexity than County HR
10. Discussion about advantages for Northern Lights to transition The Oaks CBRF to a
Dementia Care Facility
a. The current facility is an excellent set-up for this type of facility.
b. There is an enormous need for dementia care.
A balance of 25% public pay/75% private pay would be an ethical and
financially sustainable mix.
11. Northern Lights could collaborate with County to build additional facilities to ensure
continuum of care (RCAC, CBRF, Skilled Nursing, Dementia Care)
a. This would support Northern lights in caring for patients in an appropriately
staffed facility (e.g. is is not cost effective for residents in need of assisted living
support be cared for in a skilled nursing facility)
12. Northern Lights could invest in additional equipment to serve additional less common
patient needs:
a. Example: Bariatric care equipment package is approx. $6,000; this equipment
would allow NL to fill a key need and provide additional opportunities to fill beds
with residents that are a fit (medically/financially) for the facility
b. Trachea Care: need training.
c. Local/regional hospitals currently have patients that are staying in the hospital
that do not need hospital care: Perhaps hospitals would entertain an ongoing
financial partnership to ensure bed availability for these patients.
d. NL has a lot of residents not needing skilled nursing care.